Review ArticleManagement of Intracanal Separated Instruments
Section snippets
Impact of Retained Separated Instruments on Root Canal Treatment Outcome
When an instrument separates in a root canal system, 2 main concerns need to be addressed to maximize the long-term treatment outcome. The first is the existence of a metal fragment inside the tooth and the possibility of corrosion. The only available report concluded that SS fragments were inert and did not exhibit corrosion after 2 years (21). Future studies in this area on both SS and NiTi instruments are of great importance. The other main concern is that a separated instrument usually
Management Options
Management of separated instruments includes orthograde or surgical approaches. Orthograde approaches are as follows 27, 28: attempts to remove the fragment, attempts to bypass the fragment, or cleaning/shaping and filling of the root canal to the level of the fragment.
In general, it would seem appropriate that the optimum management option was removal of the fragment so that cleaning and shaping of the root canal system could be completed effectively to eliminate microorganisms. Such an
Tooth Factors
Tooth factors largely include anatomic factors that are dictated by the type of tooth, the cross-sectional shape and diameter of the root canal, position of the fragment within the root canal, location of the fragment with regard to root canal curvature, as well as the radius and degree of root canal curvature. Removal of separated instruments is more predictable in the following situations:
- 1.
In maxillary teeth 10, 29
- 2.
In anterior teeth 10, 29, 30
- 3.
When the fragment extends into the coronal third of
Techniques Used for Removing the Separated Instrument
Variations in success rates have been reported according to devices, techniques, methods, and protocols used for removal of separated instruments. Before a clinician makes the decision to remove a separated fragment, he/she should ensure the availability of and successful manipulation of the required materials, instruments, and devices. Each individual case has its own unique characteristics that will dictate the approach taken to manage the case. However, a clinician infrequently might be
Complications Associated with Removal of Separated Instruments
A variety of complications may be associated with removal of separated instruments 10, 29, 31, 42, 52, 71, 73. Ledge formation is common and usually prevents preparing and filling root canal system to the desired length (31). Ledges are also potential areas of stress concentration that may contribute to vertical root fracture (71). With the aid of magnification, ledges can be reduced or even removed by inserting a rotary file with greater taper or a precurved hand file and applying an axial
Bypassing the Separated Instrument
The ultimate goal of management of separated instruments is not only to retrieve the fragment but also to preserve the integrity of the tooth. With the associated complications, bypassing a fragment located deep in the root canal or beyond the root canal curvature, if possible, may be the appropriate treatment option. To some extent, this fulfills the objective of root canal treatment: proper cleaning and shaping of the root canal system followed by good filling. Thus, bypassing the separated
Leaving the Fragment In Situ
If a separated instrument cannot be removed or bypassed, referral of the patient to a specialist who is more experienced and equipped to handle such cases is generally the preferred option. Otherwise, cleaning, shaping, and filling the root canal system to the level of the fragment are the only alternative conservative approach. This may be especially applicable if the separation occurs toward the final stages of root canal preparation or the fragment is located in the apical third beyond a
Surgical Management of Separated Instruments
When conservative management of a separated instrument fails and clinical and/or radiographic follow-up indicates presence of disease, surgical intervention may be warranted if the tooth is to be retained. In addition, because of the evidence of adverse impact of periapical lesions on root canal treatment outcome, a surgical approach can be considered as the optimum management choice if the fragment is inaccessible and a periapical lesion is present at the time of instrument separation.
Summary
Guidelines for management of intracanal separated instruments should be based on the highest level of clinical evidence; however, this has yet to be formulated. The decision on management should consider the following: constraints of the root canal accommodating the fragment, the stage of root canal instrumentation at which the instrument separated, the expertise of the clinician, armamentaria available, possible associated complications, the strategic importance of the tooth involved, and the
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr Muhammad Hammad (Jordan University, Jordan) and Dr Alison Qualtrough (University of Manchester, United Kingdom) for their help and advice.
The authors deny any conflicts of interest related to this study.
References (82)
A dozen ways to prevent nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture
J Am Dent Assoc
(2007)- et al.
A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study
J Endod
(2006) - et al.
The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment
J Endod
(2005) - et al.
Relationship of broken root canal instruments to endodontic case prognosis: a clinical investigation
J Am Dent Assoc
(1970) - et al.
Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy
J Endod
(2011) - et al.
Incidence of instrument separation using LightSpeed rotary instruments
J Endod
(2006) - et al.
Separation incidence of protaper rotary instruments: a large cohort clinical evaluation
J Endod
(2006) - et al.
K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars
J Endod
(2004) - et al.
Effect of experience on quality of canal preparation with rotary nickel-titanium files
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
(1999) Lack of corrosion of stainless steel instruments in vivo by scanning electron microscope and microprobe analysis
J Endod
(1991)
Guidelines for the prevention of fracture of root canal instruments
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Impact of a retained instrument on treatment outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
J Endod
Impact of retained separated endodontic instruments during root canal treatment on clinical outcomes remains uncertain
J Evid Based Dent Pract
Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences
J Endod
Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: clinical cases
J Endod
Factors associated with the removal of fractured NiTi instruments from root canal systems
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study
J Endod
Factors affecting temperature rise on the external root surface during ultrasonic retrieval of intracanal separated files
J Endod
Nonsurgical retreatment
J Endod
Evaluation of the efficiency of a new file removal system in comparison with two conventional systems
J Endod
Removal of separated files from root canals with a new file-removal system: case reports
J Endod
Common failures in endodontics and their corrections
Dent Clin North Am
Retrieving broken endodontic instruments
J Am Dent Assoc
The retrieval of foreign objects from root canals: a simple aid
J Endod
Innovative uses for hypodermic needles in endodontics
J Endod
Clinical technique for the removal of root canal obstructions
J Am Dent Assoc
A new method for retrieving silver points and separated instruments from root canals
J Endod
Endodontic retreatment: case selection and technique—3: retreatment techniques
J Endod
Modified usage of the Masserann kit for removing intracanal broken instruments
J Endod
Perforation risks associated with the use of Masserann endodontic kit drills in mandibular molars
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
Ultrasonics in endodontics: a review of the literature
J Endod
Broken instrument removal: two cases
J Endod
The conservative retrieval of silver cones in difficult cases
J Endod
A new approach for the retrieval of broken instruments
J Endod
Removal of broken files from root canals by using ultrasonic techniques combined with dental microscope: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcome
J Endod
Removal of root canal obstructions using pulsed Nd:YAG laser
ICS Lasers in Dentistry
Dissolution of nickel-titanium endodontic files via an electrochemical process: a new concept for future retrieval of fractured files in root canals
J Endod
Evaluating two techniques on removal of fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an in vitro study
J Endod
Success rates for removing or bypassing fractured instruments: a prospective clinical study
J Endod
Complications associated with fractured file removal using an ultrasonic technique
J Endod
Removal of silver cones and fractured instruments using the Canal Finder System
J Endod
Cited by (100)
Two-year follow-up of a mandibular second premolar with a fractured irrigation needle extending beyond the apex: A case report
2024, Journal of Dental SciencesFEM analysis of NiTi rotary endodontic instruments to fatigue stress conditions: influence of geometrical parameters and design optimization
2023, Procedia Structural Integrity