Review articleClinical Implications and Microbiology of Bacterial Persistence after Treatment Procedures
Section snippets
Understanding Bacterial Persistence
It is important to understand some aspects related to the significance of bacteria found in posttreatment samples. In this context, one should be aware of the time that bacterial “persisters” are detected in treated canals. Studies of the bacteria occurring in the root canal after treatment approaches involve three basic conditions: (1) postinstrumentation samples (collected immediately after completion of chemomechanical procedures), (2) postmedication samples (collected immediately after the
Microbiological Goals of the Endodontic Treatment
Apical periodontitis is an infectious disease caused by microorganisms colonizing the root canal system (20, 21, 22, 23). The endodontic treatment of teeth containing irreversibly inflamed pulps is essentially a prophylactic treatment because the radicular vital pulp is usually free of infection, and the rationale is to treat in order to prevent further infection of the root canal system and consequent emergence of apical periodontitis (24). On the other hand, in cases of infected necrotic
Persistent versus Secondary Infection as the Cause of Failure
It has not been well established whether bacteria present in root canal–treated teeth with posttreatment disease remain from previous treatment (persistent infection) or are a consequence of reinfection (secondary infection). The last 2 decades have witnessed a marked interest on the role of secondary infection resulting of coronal leakage in treated root canals as an important cause of posttreatment apical periodontitis (53, 54). However, indirect evidence seems to point to persistent
Bacterial Persistence as a Risk Factor for Posttreatment Disease
Most intracanal bacteria are sensitive to standard treatment procedures. Nevertheless, some bacteria may survive treatment procedures, and their presence at the time of filling as detected by culture approaches has been recognized as a risk factor for posttreatment apical periodontitis (3, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Even though bacterial persistence may jeopardize the treatment outcome, no specific single species has been identified as a risk factor for failure. This is in agreement with the
Strategies to Persist
For bacteria to endure treatment and be detected in posttreatment samples, they must (1) resist intracanal disinfection procedures and (2) adapt to the drastically changed environment (Table 2).
Several strategies may help bacteria to resist treatment. Bacteria can adhere to the root canal walls, accumulate, and form communities organized in biofilms, which can be important for bacterial resistance to and persistence after intracanal antimicrobial procedures (69). Bacteria located in
When Residual Bacteria Influence Treatment Outcome
Bacteria persisting in the root canals after chemomechanical procedures or intracanal medication will not always maintain an infectious process. This statement is supported by the fact that some apical periodontitis lesions can heal even when bacteria were found in the canal at the filling stage (10, 11). The following are explanations for that: (1) residual bacteria may die after filling because of the toxic effects of the filling material, access denied to nutrients, or disruption of
Bacterial Taxa–Persisting Intracanal Procedures
Although several studies have investigated the impact of bacterial persistence on treatment outcome, not so many have consistently identified the species resisting root canal procedures (Table 3). In studies of the effectiveness of intracanal procedures, it is advisable to identify bacterial species at the baseline and after treatment so as to rule out possible contamination during treatment, sampling, or laboratory handling of the sample. Simply detecting growth in broth or counting colonies
Concluding Remarks
Bacteria participating in persistent infections can be identified as those present in the canal at the time of filling, although it must be recognized that many of the species found still had no sufficient time to establish a real infection and will die after filling. However, those that manage to survive in the new drastically modified environment can establish a persistent infection that put the treatment outcome at risk.
Bacterial persistence at the time of root canal filling has been shown
References (117)
- et al.
Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of bacterial communities associated with failed endodontic treatment
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
(2004) - et al.
Polymerase chain reaction-based analysis of microorganisms associated with failed endodontic treatment
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
(2004) - et al.
Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
(1998) - et al.
Microbial analysis of canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions using polymerase chain reaction
J Endod
(2008) - et al.
Factors associated with endodontic treatment failures
J Endod
(1992) - et al.
Clinical, radiographic, and histologic study of endodontic treatment failures
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
(1991) - et al.
Polymerase chain reaction identification of microorganisms in previously root-filled teeth in a South Korean population
J Endod
(2004) - et al.
Clinical efficacy of treatment procedures in endodontic infection control and one year follow-up of periapical healing
J Endod
(2005) - et al.
Enterococcus faecalis: its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment
J Endod
(2006) - et al.
The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
(1965)