A systematic review of radiographic definitions of foot osteoarthritis in population-based studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2010.05.005Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Summary

Objective

To identify the methods used in population-based epidemiological studies to diagnose radiographic foot osteoarthritis (OA) and to estimate the population prevalence of radiographic foot OA.

Method

Electronic databases searched included Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Ageline (inception to May 2009). The search strategy combined search terms for radiography, OA, foot, and specific foot joints. Predetermined selection criteria were applied. Data extracted from each paper included: sample population, radiographic views taken, foot joints examined, scoring system used, definition of OA applied, reliability of radiographic scoring and prevalence of radiographic OA in the foot.

Results

Titles and abstracts of 1035 papers were reviewed and full-texts of 21 papers were obtained. Fifteen papers met inclusion criteria and a further 12 papers were included after screening references. Radiographic views were frequently not specified (NS) but a combination of antero-posterior (AP) and lateral (Lat) views was most commonly reported. The first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint was the most commonly examined joint (n = 20, 74%). Nineteen studies (70%) used the Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) grading system, 95% of which defined OA as K&L grade  2. Estimates of the prevalence of radiographic first MTP joint OA (defined as K&L  2) in middle-aged to older adults ranged from 6.3 to 39%. Significant statistical heterogeneity prevented pooling of prevalence estimates.

Conclusion

There are comparatively few studies examining radiographic foot OA. Existing studies mainly focus on the first MTP joint and use the K&L grading system. Future studies are needed to quantify the prevalence of radiographic OA at the different joint complexes within the foot.

Keywords

Systematic search
Review
Foot
Osteoarthritis
Radiography
Prevalence

Cited by (0)