Convergent validation of EQ-5D-5L in patients with Parkinson's disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2015.08.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Convergent validity of EQ-5D-5L in Mexican subjects with PD was evaluated.

  • EQ-5D-5L was found to be internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.828).

  • Correlation between EQ-5D-5L index and PDQ-8 index was strong (rs = 0.75).

  • EQ-5D-5L was valid among clinically and demographically heterogeneous patients.

  • EQ-5D-5L showed adequate known groups validity.

Abstract

Introduction

The European Quality of Life Questionnaire 5 level version (EQ-5D-5L) is a recently updated instrument to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) that has not been validated extensively. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency and convergent validation of the EQ-5D-5L in a large sample of subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD).

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out. Consecutive Mexican subjects with PD were included. HRQoL was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L and the PDQ-8. Validity of the EQ-5D-5L was assessed determining its association with clinical ratings of disease severity, as well as correlation with PDQ-8. Additionally, performance was evaluated along predefined groups based on clinical and demographic data of known determinants of quality of life.

Results

A total of 585 patients were included for this study. A strong correlation was found between EQ-5D-5L index and PDQ-8 index (Spearman's correlation coefficient =  0.75; p < 0.001). Correlation between EQ-5D-5L index and PDQ-8 index remained strong (− 0.60 to − 0.78; p values < 0.001) through all predefined groups. EQ-5D-5L scored higher in those patients with dyskinesia, wearing off, freezing, postural instability, cognitive impairment or depressive mood (p values < 0.001).

Conclusion

The EQ-5D-5L is a valid instrument for evaluating HRQoL in PD, performing adequately irrespective of heterogeneous clinical and demographic characteristics, and showing to be sensitive to features of advanced disease and treatment complications.

Introduction

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by both motor and non-motor features [1]. Currently, management of subjects with PD is focused in symptomatic control and improvement of their quality of life. The impact of different factors on quality of life has recently become a major topic in PD research. These factors include motor symptoms such as motor fluctuations, postural instability and difficulty in activities of daily living; as well as non-motor symptoms like depression and cognitive decline [2], [3]. Recognizing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as a clinical outcome implies the need of a valid and reliable instrument to assess HRQoL. The International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society has published recommendations for the measurement of HRQoL in patients with PD distinguishing between “recommended”, “suggested” and “listed” scales [4]. Although these scales are useful for assessing HRQoL in subjects with PD, not all of them are suitable for cost-utility analysis (CUA) of healthcare interventions. An exception to this is the non-specific European Quality of Life Questionnaire 3 level version (EQ-5D-3L), designed to measure five domains into three answering levels [5]. The EQ-5D-3L has been validated in patients with PD [6], [7], [8], and is widely used in CUA studies [9], [10], [11]. Recently, this instrument has been updated to a 5-level version (EQ-5D-5L), with the intention of decreasing the ceiling effect reported for the original version [12]. Since this instrument is relatively new few studies have addressed its validity in specific diseases.

To the best of our knowledge only one study assessing the validation of EQ-5D-5L on Spanish patients with PD has been published [13]. Validation of clinimetric instruments are essential to allow data pooling, as well as international and cross-cultural comparisons. In addition, HRQoL in subjects with Parkinson's disease is affected by several factors related to the disease progression and treatment that should be taken into account when using clinical scales and questionnaires.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the internal consistency and convergent validation of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire Short Form (PDQ-8), as well as the effect of known determinants of HRQoL, in a large sample of Mexican subjects with PD.

Section snippets

Procedure

A cross-sectional study was conducted including consecutive subjects attending the movement disorders outpatient clinic at five different centers in Mexico (Mexico City, Zacatecas, Merida, Monterrey and Guadalajara), with diagnosis with PD as determined by internationally accepted criteria [14]. Consecutive sampling refers to the fact that select every subject that met the inclusion criteria was selected to participate. Subjects with psychosis (based on Movement Disorders Society Unified

Results

A total of 585 patients (54.4% male and 45.5% female) were included. The mean age was 62.9 ± 12.3 years and the mean disease duration was 7.6 ± 6.1 years. All patients had antiparkinsonian treatment (75.7% with levodopa and 60.3% with a dopamine agonist). Mean MDS-UPDRS part III score was 30.5 ± 18.5. The HY staging was distributed as follows: 59.2% mild disease (stages I–II), 30.6% moderate disease (stage III) and 10.2% severe disease (stages IV and V). Mean EQ-5D-5Lindex and EQ-VAS score was 0.71 ± 0.2

Discussion

A recent “paradigm shift” in the management of patients with PD has dominated scientific literature in the past 10 years. Previously, treatment was mainly focused on documenting and optimizing motor functions. Now, there is increasing awareness on non-motor features, and the relevance of activities of daily life and the psychological well-being of the patient. Nowadays, measurement of HRQoL is considered as an important clinical outcome. Additionally, instruments such as EQ-5D-5L are

Conclusions

The EQ-5D-5L showed to be a valid instrument for evaluating HRQoL in Mexican patients with PD. In our study this generic scale performed adequately irrespective of heterogeneous clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with PD, showing to be sensitive to features of advanced disease and treatment complications.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to the research covered in this article.

Funding sources

The study required no funding.

References (27)

  • B. van Hout et al.

    Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets

    Value Health

    (2012)
  • L.C. Tan et al.

    Validity and reliability of the PDQ-39 and the PDQ-8 in English-speaking Parkinson's disease patients in Singapore

    Parkinsonism Relat. Disord.

    (2004)
  • J. Jankovic

    Parkinson's disease: clinical features and diagnosis

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • A. Schrag et al.

    What contributes to quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease?

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (2000)
  • S. Rahman et al.

    Quality of life in Parkinson's disease: the relative importance of the symptoms

    Mov. Disord.

    (2008)
  • P. Martinez‐Martin et al.

    Health‐related quality‐of‐life scales in Parkinson's disease: critique and recommendations

    Mov. Disord.

    (2011)
  • R. Rabin et al.

    EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group

    Ann. Med.

    (2001)
  • A. Schrag et al.

    The EQ-5D—a generic quality of life measure—is a useful instrument to measure quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg.

    (2000)
  • N. Luo et al.

    Is EQ-5D a valid quality of life instrument in patients with Parkinson's disease? A study in Singapore

    Ann. Acad. Med. Singap.

    (2009)
  • N. Luo et al.

    Responsiveness of the EQ-5D and 8-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) in a 4-year follow-up study

    Qual. Life Res.

    (2010)
  • J. Brazier et al.

    A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation

    J. Health Serv. Res. Policy

    (1999)
  • P. Räsänen et al.

    Use of quality-adjusted life years for the estimation of effectiveness of health care: a systematic literature review

    Int. J. Technol. Assess.

    (2006)
  • C.H. Dowding et al.

    A review of the health-related quality of life and economic impact of Parkinson's disease

    Drug & Aging

    (2006)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Heterogeneous pain trajectories in persons with Parkinson's disease

      2022, Parkinsonism and Related Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      One such generic tool is the EuroQol 5 dimensions with five response levels (EQ-5D-5L), which measures mobility, self-care, daily activities, anxiety and depression, and pain and discomfort [17]. EQ-5D-5L is a valid and less time-consuming instrument for evaluating HRQoL in PWP [18]. The objective of the current study is to describe longitudinal self-reported pain trajectories in PWP, specifically health-related pain and discomfort captured by EQ-5D-5L.

    • Test-Retest Reliability of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Techniques: The Composite Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiments

      2018, Value in Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this protocol, the composite TTO (C-TTO) and DCE were the chosen elicitation techniques [4]. Several studies [5–11] concluded that the clinical administration of the descriptive part of the EQ-5D-5L was valid and reliable. Three studies [12–14] evaluated the reliability of the valuation techniques used to obtain value sets.

    • Older adults' quality of life – Exploring the role of the built environment and social cohesion in community-dwelling seniors on low income.

      2016, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP-O were included in this study because previous work has indicated that these measures are complements (rather than substitutes) in regard to providing information about a person's QoL (Davis et al., 2013). The psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L are well established across many countries and population groups (Alvarado-Bolanos et al., 2015; Feng et al., 2015; Golicki et al., 2015; Herdman et al., 2011). Also the ICECAP-O has been validated in a number of studies (in the UK (Coast et al., 2008b), Germany (Makai et al., 2014), Australia (Couzner et al., 2013) and the Netherlands (Makai et al., 2013)) and has consistently been found to be a valid instrument to measure capability wellbeing.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text