Modeling reading development: Cumulative, incremental learning in a computational model of word naming

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Natural reading development gradually builds up to the adult vocabulary over a period of years. This has an effect on lexical processing: early-acquired words are processed more quickly and more accurately than later-acquired words. We present a connectionist model of reading, learning to map orthography onto phonology to simulate this natural reading development. The model learned early words more robustly than late words, and also showed interactions between age of acquisition and spelling-sound consistency that have been reported for skilled adult readers. In additional simulations, we demonstrated that age of acquisition effects are a consequence of incremental exposure to words in concert with changes in plasticity as learning proceeds, and are not due to uncontrolled differences in ease of reading between early and late-acquired words. Models which do not learn through cumulative training are unable to explain age of acquisition and related effects.

Introduction

Computational models of reading map orthographic input representations (letters or letter sequences) onto phonological (sound-based) and/or semantic (meaning-based) representations. In the model of Harm and Seidenberg (1999), for example, the input units represent the letters in written words while the output units represent phonological features of phonemes (individual speech sounds) in spoken words. The model is trained over time to generate the appropriate phonological output for each of the different inputs that correspond to the written words it learns to “read”. As Harm and Seidenberg (1999) observed, their model built on several previous computational models of reading (Plaut et al., 1996, Seidenberg and McClelland, 1989) and has since been extended by others (Harm and Seidenberg, 2004, Perry et al., 2007). A feature of all of these attempts to simulate visual word recognition is that the words that the model is required to learn are all entered into training together from the outset. But as Harm and Seidenberg (1999) also noted, natural reading development is not like that: young children embarking upon the task of learning to read will typically begin with a first reading book that contains 5 or 10 words, repeated several times. The next book will repeat those words and add a few more, and so on. For a reader of English it can take 10–15 years to acquire a full, adult reading vocabulary (Nation, 2009). This process of gradual, cumulative, incremental training that starts with a few words and builds a vocabulary over time is quite unlike the training implemented in existing computational models of visual word recognition.

The present study aimed to explore the consequences of training a computational model of reading in a more natural way. Our goal was to discover whether the final state of a developmentally-trained model would show an influence of the point at which words were entered into training and, if it did, whether that influence would be greater for words with irregular or exceptional spelling-sound correspondences than for words with regular, consistent correspondences. The reasons for investigating these possibilities are embedded in the literature on effects of age of acquisition (AoA) in adult reading. The next section will summarise the relevant findings.

Section snippets

Age of acquisition effects in adult visual word recognition

The claim that the age at which words are learned might affect the speed with which they can be processed in adulthood was first made in relation to object naming. Carroll and White (1973) analysed naming latencies for 94 object pictures and found that they were better predicted by a measure of the AoA of the object names than by a measure of their word frequency. The effect of AoA on object naming speed has been replicated many times, with several more recent studies reporting effects of both

Criticisms of age of acquisition effects in visual word recognition

The claim that the AoA of words (or the order in which they are acquired) affects their speed of processing in adulthood has proved controversial (Zevin and Seidenberg, 2002, Zevin and Seidenberg, 2004; see also Strain, Patterson, & Seidenberg, 2002, and the response by Ellis and Monaghan (2002)). All of the studies of AoA effects in visual word recognition have sought to match their early and late acquired word sets on the frequency with which they occur in adult language. Zevin and Seidenberg

Simulating age of acquisition effects in connectionist networks: the role of the predictability of input–output mappings

There is a growing body of modeling literature which suggests that graded exposure or learning of words results in distinctions in representational structure for early- versus late-acquired items. Steyvers and Tenenbaum (2005) considered early- versus late-acquisition of words in the vocabulary in terms of associations between words. They found that early-acquired words tended to have more associations with other words than did later-acquired words, and proposed this was because early-acquired

Developmental and non-developmental models of reading

These reflections led us to conclude that it is premature to claim that AoA effects in word naming are artefactual, or that they are incompatible with existing computational models of reading. We considered it still possible that AoA effects might emerge if a computational model was trained in a manner that respected and reflected the way that reading vocabularies are actually acquired. The simulations presented below are all based on Harm and Seidenberg’s (1999) computational model of reading,

Analysis of the models’ performance

The analysis of the models is presented in three stages. First, we report the effect of order of presentation of words (PoE) on the models’ learning of the mappings between orthography and phonology to determine whether, as predicted, this accounts for variance in a dynamic, incrementally-trained model of reading. We test the extent to which WFG-AoA predicts variance in the models’ performance before and after PoE has been partialled out. This enables us to determine whether the manipulation of

Effects of AoA and frequency in models of reading

We have presented three computational models of word naming derived from the Harm and Seidenberg (1999) simulation. For each, we have demonstrated that the order in which words were presented to the model had a profound influence on the model’s learning – those words that occurred earlier in training were read more accurately at the end of training than those words that occurred later in training, even when cumulative frequency and other psycholinguistic factors of the words were taken into

Conclusions

Zevin and Seidenberg (2002, p. 2) wrote that “the finding that AoA affects performance independent of frequency seems to present a challenge for models of word reading”. This is indeed true for practical reasons because incremental training of a model sampling words according to frequency tends to sample the higher frequency words earlier for presentation to the model. The three models we present demonstrate this effect in practice, yet we have shown that PoE, as a reflection of AoA for the

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Marc Brysbaert, Daragh Sibley, and an anonymous reviewer for very helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

References (86)

  • F.-X. Alario et al.

    Predictors of picture naming speed

    Behavior Research Methods. Instruments and Computers

    (2005)
  • Anderson, K. L., & Cottrell, G. W. (2001). Age of acquisition and connectionist networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd...
  • S. Andrews

    Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

    (1992)
  • R.H. Baayen et al.

    The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM) linguistic data consortium

    (1995)
  • D.A. Balota et al.

    Visual word recognition for single syllable words

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

    (2004)
  • C. Barry et al.

    Effects of age of acquisition, age, and repetition priming on object naming

    Visual Cognition

    (2006)
  • C. Barry et al.

    Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency and name agreement

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1997)
  • E. Bates et al.

    Word reading and picture naming in Italian

    Memory & Cognition

    (2001)
  • P. Bonin et al.

    The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks: A never ending story?

    Journal of Memory and Language

    (2004)
  • P. Bonin et al.

    The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies

    British Journal of Psychology

    (2002)
  • G.D.A. Brown et al.

    First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency

    Memory & Cognition

    (1987)
  • M. Brysbaert et al.

    The effects of age of acquisition and frequency of occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from Dutch

    European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

    (2000)
  • M. Brysbaert et al.

    Age of acquisition effects in semantic tasks

    Acta Psychologica

    (2000)
  • B. Butler et al.

    Individual differences in word recognition latency

    Memory & Cognition

    (1979)
  • J.B. Carroll et al.

    Word frequency and age-of-acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1973)
  • M. Chalard et al.

    Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French: Relationships with psycholinguistic variables, the English data from Morrison et al. (1997), and naming latencies

    European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

    (2003)
  • N. Chomsky et al.

    The sound pattern of English

    (1968)
  • L. Colombo et al.

    The influence of age of acquisition, root frequency, and context availability in processing nouns and verbs

    Brain and Language

    (2002)
  • M. Coltheart et al.

    Access to the internal lexicon

  • V. Coltheart et al.

    Effects of word imageability and age of acquisition on children’s reading

    British Journal of Psychology

    (1988)
  • M. Coltheart et al.

    DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud

    Psychological Review

    (2001)
  • M.J. Cortese et al.

    Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2342 words

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (2007)
  • F. Cuetos et al.

    Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish

    Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers

    (1999)
  • A.W. Ellis et al.

    Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

    (2000)
  • A.W. Ellis et al.

    Reply to strain, Patterson, and Seidenberg

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

    (2002)
  • A.W. Ellis et al.

    Real age of acquisition effects in lexical retrieval

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

    (1998)
  • S. Gerhand et al.

    Age of acquisition and frequency effects in speeded word naming

    Cognition

    (1999)
  • M. Ghyselinck et al.

    The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: Further evidence for the semantic hypothesis

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

    (2004)
  • M. Ghyselinck et al.

    Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation

    Acta Psychologica

    (2004)
  • K.J. Gilhooly et al.

    Word age-of-acquisition, reading latencies and auditory recognition

    Current Psychological Research

    (1981)
  • R.J. Glushko

    The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1979)
  • M.W. Harm et al.

    Phonology, reading and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models

    Psychological Review

    (1999)
  • M.W. Harm et al.

    Computing the meaning of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes

    Psychological Review

    (2004)
  • A.E. Hernandez et al.

    Age of acquisition: Its neural and computational mechanisms

    Psychological Bulletin

    (2007)
  • Y. Hino et al.

    Effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (2000)
  • C. Izura et al.

    Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages

    Psicológica

    (2002)
  • C. Izura et al.

    Age of acquisition effects in translation judgment tasks

    Journal of Memory and Language

    (2004)
  • R.A. Johnston et al.

    Age of acquisition and lexical processing

    Visual Cognition

    (2006)
  • B.J. Juhasz

    Age of acquisition effects in word and picture identification

    Psychological Bulletin

    (2005)
  • B.J. Juhasz et al.

    Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

    (2003)
  • H. Kucera et al.

    Computational analysis of present-day American English

    (1967)
  • Lake, B.M. & Cottrell, G.W. (2005). Age of acquisition in facial identification: A connectionist approach. In...
  • M.A. Lambon Ralph et al.

    Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence. Empirical and computational evidence

    Visual Cognition

    (2006)
  • Cited by (75)

    • A computational model of reading across development: Effects of literacy onset on language processing

      2019, Journal of Memory and Language
      Citation Excerpt :

      The details of the training regime can be seen in Table 1. The number of presentations in each reading training stage was adopted from those used in Monaghan and Ellis (2010) but was adjusted to accommodate the gradually increasing reading training ratios in the present study to ensure accurate learning. All the other training procedures remained the same as in oral language training.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text