Temporal changes as event boundaries: Processing and memory consequences of narrative time shifts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Readers comprehend narrative texts by constructing a series of mental models of the situations described in the text. These models are updated when readers encounter information indicating that the current model is no longer relevant, such as a change in narrative time. The results of four experiments suggest that readers perceive temporal changes in narrative texts as event boundaries, and that when a temporal change is encountered during reading, readers are slower and less able to accurately retrieve prior information from memory. However, the slower responses following temporal changes may be due to processing costs associated with the temporal change, rather than decreased availability in memory. The results of these experiments suggest that readers may use event boundaries as a means for controlling the contents of memory.

Section snippets

Experiment 1

The first experiment used an event segmentation procedure to test the hypothesis that temporal changes in narrative text are explicitly perceived as event boundaries. In a typical event segmentation paradigm, participants watch a movie of an everyday event, and are asked to segment the activity in the movie by pressing a button when they believe one meaningful unit of activity ends and another begins (Newtson, 1973). This segmentation procedure has been shown to reliably measure perceptual

Experiment 2

In standard memory paradigms involving the retention of lists of words or digits, it is well established that greater amounts of intervening information, rather than a longer duration, between an item and its subsequent reappearance lead to a greater likelihood that the original information will be forgotten (Waugh & Norman, 1965). However, the situation model view advocated here suggests that in narrative reading, it may be that neither time nor the sheer amount of intervening information is

Experiment 3

The results of Experiment 2 establish that temporal changes in narratives can influence the ability to retrieve prior information from memory. However, the explicit recognition paradigm used in Experiment 2 and in studies by other researchers differs in many ways from the normal process of reading. To generalize the results of these studies to discourse comprehension, it is necessary to know whether temporal changes influence memory retrieval in ongoing discourse. Therefore, the current

Experiment 4

Experiment 2 established that in a direct memory test, accuracy for identifying previously presented objects is reduced following a temporal change, and Experiment 3 found that anaphoric references to those objects were slower following a temporal change. One possibility is that the slower anaphor reading times observed in Experiment 3 are the result of the reduced memory found in Experiment 2. However, an alternative possibility is that the memory accuracy and reading time effects are both

General discussion

The first goal of the current series of studies was to determine whether readers perceive temporal changes as event boundaries between consecutive episodes of activity in narrative text. The results clearly suggest that they do. Readers were more likely to perceive an event boundary at the points at which a temporal reference indicated a change in narrative time (“An hour later…”) than at any other points in the narratives. In addition, they were quite likely to identify event boundaries at

References (40)

  • K.A. Ericsson et al.

    Long-term working memory

    Psychological Review

    (1995)
  • M.A. Gernsbacher

    Language comprehension as structure building

    (1990)
  • P.N. Johnson-Laird

    Mental models: Toward a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness

    (1983)
  • W. Kintsch

    The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model

    Psychological Review

    (1988)
  • F. Landman

    The progressive

    Natural Language Semantics

    (1992)
  • J.P. Magliano et al.

    Indexing space and time in film understanding

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    (2001)
  • G. McKoon et al.

    Inference during reading

    Psychological Review

    (1992)
  • M. Moens et al.

    Temporal ontology and temporal reference

    Computational Linguistics

    (1988)
  • D. Newtson

    Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1973)
  • D. Newtson

    Foundations of attribution: The perception of ongoing behavior

  • Cited by (122)

    • Prediction error and event segmentation in episodic memory

      2024, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    • Contextual inference in learning and memory

      2023, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similarly, items separated by event boundaries are remembered as being further apart in time compared with those presented within the same event [17,42,44]. Recognition of a previous item is also less accurate when an event boundary separates the encoding of the item and the subsequent recognition test [45,46]. The effects of event boundaries can also be observed in more naturalistic settings.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship to N.K.S., as well as grants from the James S. McDonnell Foundation and the National Science Foundation (0236651) to J.M.Z. The authors thank Pascale Michelon, Jeremy Reynolds, Khena Swallow, and Jean Vettel for helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript, as well as Mitch Dornfeld, Justin Lerner, Jennifer Scott, and Melissa Vogel for help with stimulus construction and data collection.

    View full text