FlashReportsInteracting with women can impair men’s cognitive functioning
Section snippets
Participants and design
Forty male students (average age 20.6) participated, and were randomly assigned to either the same-sex or opposite-sex condition.
Procedure
Upon arrival in the lab, a male experimenter seated the participant behind a computer in a small room. All further instructions were presented on the computer screen.
First, as a baseline measure of cognitive performance, participants completed a 2-back task (for details, see Braver et al., 1997). This task has been widely used as an indicator of cognitive performance
Study 2
Study 2 was designed to extend Study 1 in several aspects. First, we used a different measure of cognitive functioning, and used both male and female participants. Moreover, instead of using confederates which may restrict the generalizability of the findings, in Study 2 each participant interacted with another, either same-sex or opposite-sex, participant. Finally, rather than measuring perceived attractiveness, Study 2 explicitly measured participants’ self-reported impression management
General discussion
Not only can mixed-sex interactions sometimes feel awkward, the current findings demonstrate that interacting with an opposite-sex other can actually impair cognitive functioning. This effect occurred irrespective of whether participants were romantically involved or single, and especially among males, which paralleled the finding that men’s (but not women’s) self-presentational concerns were stronger in mixed-sex as compared to same-sex encounters. Also in line with a self-presentational
References (20)
- et al.
A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory
NeuroImage
(1997) Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness?
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1982)- et al.
Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence
Personality and Social Psychological Review
(2001) - et al.
Self-regulation failure: An overview
Psychological Inquiry
(1996) - et al.
Shyness and sociability re-examined: A multicomponent analysis
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1989) - et al.
Sexual Strategies Theory: A contextual evolutionary analysis of human mating
Psychological Review
(1993) The extrinsic affective Simon task
Experimental Psychology
(2003)- et al.
High-maintenance interaction: Inefficient social coordination impairs self-regulation
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(2006) Boys, girls, and achievement: Addressing the classroom issues
(2000)- et al.
Mimicking attractive opposite-sex others: The role of romantic relationship status
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
(2008)
Cited by (45)
Motor performance in joint action tasks: The impact of dyadic motive fit
2023, Human Movement ScienceWhen Beauty Backfires: The Effects of Server Attractiveness on Consumer Taste Perceptions
2018, Journal of RetailingGenuine eye contact elicits self-referential processing
2017, Consciousness and CognitionCitation Excerpt :In future studies, it would be interesting to investigate the interplay of personal characteristics of the counterparts and the self-awareness effect of eye contact. For example, it has been found that the cognitive functioning of men (but not of women) is impaired by a mixed-sex interaction due to increased impression management, same-sex interactions having no such effect on either gender (Karremans, Verwijmeren, Pronk, & Reitsma, 2009). The increased attempt of men to control women’s impression of themselves may be associated with increased self-focus and enhanced self-awareness.
Cortisol reactivity to psychosocial stress mediates the relationship between extraversion and unrestricted sociosexuality
2015, Personality and Individual DifferencesCitation Excerpt :Although we had no measure of trait anxiety, stable differences in cortisol responses to psychosocial stress are presumably accompanied by stable differences in social anxiety. High social anxiety may leak through behavior and make an individual less attractive to a potential mate; high anxiety may also cause mild temporary impairments in cognitive function (Karremans, Verwijmeren, Pronk, & Reitsma, 2009; Nauts, Metzmacher, Verwijmeren, Rommeswinkel, & Karremans, 2012) and interfere with an individual's ability to effectively communicate with and impress a potential mate. Above and beyond the role of anxiety, high cortisol itself can impair cognitive processes and interfere with courtship behavior (de Kloet et al., 1999).
Sexually selective cognition
2015, Current Opinion in PsychologyCitation Excerpt :ERP data suggest that, although most men devote resources to processing images of highly attractive women, only men with relatively low mate value carefully process less women, presumably because those women reflect realistic mates for relatively less attractive men [15•]. Ironically, because cognitive resources are limited, focusing on attractive women and even just anticipating a cross-sex interaction impairs men's cognitive performance [16,17]. Recent research has extended such findings by delineating the portions of the body that are preferentially attended to when people are evaluating potential mates.