Original ArticleMinimally important change values of a measurement instrument depend more on baseline values than on the type of intervention
Introduction
Sciatica is a common health problem causing severe pain and disability in individual patients and high costs to society [1]. Sciatica (lumbar radiculopathy) is characterized by radiating pain in the leg typically served by one nerve root in the lumbar or sacral spine. It is sometimes also associated with sensory and motor deficits. The most common cause of sciatica is a herniated disk with associated nerve root compression. The most important symptoms are pain in the leg and related disability. The diagnosis is mainly based on history taking and physical examination. Diagnostic imaging is indicated directly when severe underlying pathology in suspected (infections, malignancies), otherwise only after 6–8 weeks when severe symptoms fail to respond to conservative care. Surgery is indicated when computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging show disk herniation, but only when the clinical findings and symptoms (eg, location of leg pain) correspond well with the imaging findings [2].
The natural history of acute sciatica is favorable, with resolution of leg pain within 8 weeks from the onset in most patients [2], [3]. From this perspective, optimal care starts with symptomatic and conservative treatment. Only in case of persistent severe complaints, more invasive treatment might be indicated.
To assess health status and outcome of interventions for sciatica patients, patient-reported outcomes assessing disability and pain are most relevant. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) [4] is frequently used to measure functional status in back pain-related disability. The RMDQ was modified for sciatica patients by Patrick et al. [5], by deleting one item and exchanging four others with alternative statements resulting in a 23-item questionnaire with increased responsiveness to sciatica. In this study, we used this RMDQ-23 for measuring disability in sciatica patients.
As leg pain is often more pronounced than back pain in patients with sciatica, we also assessed pain intensity in the leg, using a visual analogue scale (VAS) [6].
In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), statistical significance of a difference in change of scores over time does not necessarily imply that this change is clinically relevant. To facilitate interpretation of outcomes, benchmarks in pain improvement have been suggested, for example by the IMMPACT group, for minimal important improvement (10–20% pain reduction), moderate improvement (≥30%), and substantial improvement (≥50% pain reduction). [7] A minimally important change (MIC), defined as the smallest change in score that patients perceive as important, is assumed to be a characteristic of a measurement instrument and therefore assumed not to depend on the type of intervention that patients receive. However, there is little evidence to support the assumption. Some studies have shown that the MIC is dependent on the initial baseline scores [8], [9] and it has been suggested that MIC might also depend on the invasiveness or inconvenience of the intervention [10]. We used data from a RCT [ISRCTN26872154] that compared early surgery with prolonged conservative treatment among patients with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation [11]. In this population with patients receiving quite different treatments, we examined whether the assumption holds that MIC values are independent of type of intervention received. Additionally, we also examine the influence of baseline values.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
In the multicenter RCT, 283 patients who had severe sciatica for 6 to 12 weeks were randomly assigned to early surgery or to prolonged conservative treatment with surgery if needed. The details of this study can be found elsewhere [11], [12]. Briefly, patients recruited were aged 18 to 65 years, with a radiologically confirmed disc herniation and lumbosacral radicular syndrome diagnosed by the attending neurologist who had lasted for 6 to 12 weeks. Early surgery was scheduled within 2 weeks
Results
Some demographic characteristics and baseline values of 243 patients are presented in Table 1. Table 2 lists the mean change scores with their standard deviations on the RMDQ-23 and the VAS leg pain for each score on the general and leg pain–specific GPR question.
As shown in the last rows of Table 2, 139 of 243 patients (57.4%) were considered as “importantly improved” (GPR score 1–2) and 95 of 243 (38.8%) as “not importantly changed” (GPR score 3–5). The Spearman correlation of RMDQ-23 change
Discussion
For subgroups according to the treatment patients received, we found only slight differences in the MIC value for RMDQ-23 and VAS for leg pain, although they appeared to differ substantially for subgroups with high and low baselines for these measures.
In this analysis, we deviated from the intention-to-treat analysis [12] because we wanted to compare the MIC values for patients who indeed underwent surgery and who had actually received conservative treatment. Therefore, we excluded 17 patients
References (24)
- et al.
The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?
Pain
(1997) - et al.
Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations
J Pain
(2008) - et al.
Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point rating scale
Pain
(2001) - et al.
Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance
J Chronic Dis
(1986) - et al.
Exact confidence interval estimation for the Youden index and its corresponding optimal cut-point
Comput Stat Data Anal
(2012) - et al.
What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire?
Eur J Pain
(2010) - et al.
Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference
Control Clin Trials
(1989) - et al.
The smallest worthwhile effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and physiotherapy for chronic low back pain: a benefit-harm trade-off study
J Clin Epidemiol
(2013) - et al.
The trend in total cost of back pain in the Netherlands in the period 2002 to 2007
Spine
(2011) - et al.
Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica
BMJ
(2007)
Conservative treatment of sciatica: a systematic review
J Spinal Disord
A study of the natural history of low-back pain. Part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care
Spine (Phila Pa 1976.)
Cited by (41)
How much is enough? Considering minimally important change in youth mental health outcomes
2022, The Lancet PsychiatryMinimal important change was on the lower spectrum of previous estimates and responsiveness was sufficient for core outcomes in chronic low back pain
2022, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyMinimal important changes and differences were estimated for Oxford hip and knee scores following primary and revision arthroplasty
2022, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyThe minimal important change for the seven-item disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH 7) questionnaire – Assessing shoulder function in patients with subacromial pain
2021, JSES InternationalCitation Excerpt :An AUC greater than 0.7 indicates an adequate ability to distinguish between the improved patients and those not improved,42 as this result is considered as evidence for good responsiveness of the DASH 7. As mentioned in the introduction, MIC values are reported to possibly differ depending on patient population,5,6,8 context,5 and also on the method used for calculation.1,5,8 Rysstad et al (2017)35 reported an MIC value at 4.4 points for the original 30-item DASH in patients with subacromial pain which can be considered in line with 6.5 for the DASH 7.
Baseline health status and setting impacted minimal clinically important differences in COPD: an exploratory study
2019, Journal of Clinical EpidemiologyCitation Excerpt :This could possibly be a solution and may be applied in clinical practice to interpret individual change scores. It has been hypothesized that disease severity—measured in the present study by spirometry—could impact the MCID [16,17,20,23–39]. Previous—but also present—research demonstrated that worse health status was correlated with worse lung function [9–13], although this correlation was only weak to moderate [4–7].
Conflict of interest: None.