Empirical researchPsychometric properties of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth: A psychological measure of psychological inflexibility in youth
Introduction
There is a new generation of behaviour and cognitive therapies that focuses on processes such as acceptance, mindfulness, attention and values (Hayes, Barnes-Holmes, & Wilson, 2012). According to Hayes, Boyd, and Sewell (2011), these approaches differ from more traditional cognitive behaviour therapies (CBTs) on philosophical, theoretical, and clinical grounds and are referred to as “contextual behavioural therapies” or “contextual CBTs” (Hayes, Villatte, Levin, & Hildebrandt, 2011). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is one of those therapies and has a broad and growing body of evidence for its effectiveness and efficacy. Meta-analytic studies and systematic reviews have shown that ACT is effective with medium to large effect sizes when compared to wait list control groups or treatment as usual comparison groups, across a very wide range of problem areas (A-Tjak et al., 2015; Hayes et al., 2006, Ost, 2014, Powers et al., 2009). ACT has also been applied across a variety of child and adolescent populations, even if there are yet few published studies that examine their apparent efficacy (Halliburton & Cooper, 2015).
Among the more notable differences between ACT and more traditional CBT models is the emphasis in ACT on “effective living” (as clients define it) and not on symptom alleviation per se; thus, the goal of ACT is to promote living meaningful lives, even if doing so causes stress and self-doubt. To this end, the goal of ACT is to increase psychological flexibility, which is defined as the ability to contact the present moment, as it is and without psychological defence, and based upon what the situation affords, to change or persist in behaviour in accordance with one's values (Hayes & Strosahl, 2004). When persisting in behaviour in accordance with one's values, people can experience psychological events like stress, sadness, pain and anxiety, even if they are making progress towards living a more meaningful life. Hence, there is a need for measures that capture this construct of psychological flexibility, across different populations and situations.
The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II) is a widely used measure of psychological inflexibility for adults. The AAQ-II has adequate psychometric characteristics (Bond et al., 2011), and it has been adapted for specific populations, such as smokers (Gifford et al., 2004), pain patients (Vowles, McCracken, McLeod, & Eccleston, 2008) and those coping with epilepsy (Lundgren, Dahl, Yardi, & Melin, 2008). The AAQ-II has also been tailored for different use in specific situations, such as the work context (Bond, Lloyd, & Guenole, 2013).
However, there are few validated measures of psychological inflexibility for children and adolescents. To our knowledge, the only existing questionnaire with published psychometric properties, is the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y), (Greco et al., 2008aa, Greco et al., 2008bb), which Greco et al., 2008aa, Greco et al., 2008bb showed was a valid and reliable measure of psychological flexibility in this population.
There have been two published tests of the psychometric properties of the AFQ-Y for adults (Fergus et al., 2012, Schmalz and Murrell, 2010). Schmalz and Murrell (2010) that compared the AAQ-II with AFQ-Y. These examined the possibility that the AFQ-Y may serve as a better global measure of psychological inflexibility than the AAQ-II, at least amongst children and adolescents. Two reasons for suspecting this are: 1) that the AAQ-II, though psychometrically sound, does not measure psychological inflexibility in a more general way since it does not address avoidance of physical sensations, and 2) the AFQ-Y was developed as a measure of psychological inflexibility in children and adolescents, specifically. The authors maintain that the items were created to use what they considered to be less ACT-specific language that required less knowledge of ACT to understand the intended meanings. Schmalz and Murrell (2010) found that AFQ-Y and AAQ-II scores were significantly related, but they were not so closely related as to say they measured the same construct. They go on to purport reasons as to why the AFQ-Y is perhaps a more exacting and comprehensible measure of psychological inflexibility.
Fergus et al. (2012) also compared the AAQ-II with AFQ-Y. Three of their main findings were: 1) The AFQ-Y demand a lower reading level. The AFQ-Y (but not the AAQ-II) demonstrated a reading level at or below the recommended 5th or 6th grade reading level. 2) The AFQ-Y demonstrated adequate reliability and validity, and 3) The AFQ-Y showed incremental validity over the AAQ-II in predicting several psychological symptom domains among adults.
Taking the findings from Fergus et al., 2012, Schmalz and Murrell, 2010, the AFQ-Y appears to be a more appropriate and promising assessment tool for older adolescents relative to the AAQ-II, especially when reading levels are low. Despite these findings, there is a need to replicate and further analyze the psychometric characteristics of the AFQ-Y. Thus, the present study has four aims: 1) to further validate the AFQ-Y, 2) to test the reliability of findings in comparison to earlier research, 3) to test the generalizability of the measure in a non-English language used by people in a different country and culture (Sweden), 4) to test the validity and reliability of a shorter 8-item version of the AFQ-Y.
Section snippets
Participants
All adolescents included in the study were admitted to inpatient psychiatric units at The National Board of Institutional Care (NBIC), which is a Swedish government agency that delivers institutional care for young people (12–20 years) with psychosocial problems. NBIC typically provides care and treatment for young people after other interventions have proved insufficient. The adolescents at NBIC in this sample had a range of problems including psychosocial problems, substance misuse problems,
Missing values
Instructions on how to handle missing items on the AFQ-Y scales are provided by its creator (Greco et al., 2008aa, Greco et al., 2008bb): if it is at least 85% complete (up to 3 missing on AFQ-Y or 1 missing on the AFQ-Y8), the total score is computed by imputing the missing values with the average of the answered items.
Stability
Stability was investigated by a test-retest of participants from the TAU group where data from the T2 and T3 data collections (two- and four weeks into the study) were used.
Missing values
Out of 160 participants, only one was excluded from the main analyses due to too many missing values. For the test-retest analysis only 124 participants were available since data from T2 and T3 were used for that analysis. Of the 35 missing participants, 34 of them did not complete the measures at the T2 or T3 observation points. Anecdotal feedback suggests that a main reason for that loss was that participants did not receive any gift certificates for those two observation points and,
Discussion
The aim of the present study was to replicate the findings of an earlier investigation of the AFQ-Y and investigate the psychometric qualities in a different context and language. Our results confirmed the reliability and convergent validity, with regards to the construct of psychological inflexibility, of the AFQ-Y. Indeed, both AFQ versions related in a theoretically consistent way with other psychological constructs. The AFQ-Y8 was best represented by a single factor structure, while the
Conclusions
In summary, this study, based in Sweden, supports the reliability, and generality of both AFQ-Y17 and the shorter version AFQ-Y8. With regards to validity, both versions related in a theoretically consistent way with other, hypothesized psychological constructs. The AFQ-Y8 was best represented by a single factor structure, whereas the AFQ-Y did not. Overall, the AFQ-Y and AFQ-Y8 may be valuable clinical tools in reflecting changes in psychological inflexibility among adolescents. However, since
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
The National Board of Institutional Care (Grant number 41-623-2010) (Statens institutionsstyrelse, or SiS) provided financial support for the corresponding author during his work on this manuscript and for the work described in this paper. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of The National Board of Institutional Care.
References (35)
- et al.
Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire – II: A revised measure of psychological flexibility and acceptance
Behavior Therapy
(2011) - et al.
Applying a functional acceptance based model to smoking cessation: An initial trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Behavior Therapy
(2004) - et al.
Applications and adaptations of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for adolescents
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
(2015) - et al.
Contextual behavioral science: Creating a science more adequate to the challenge of the human condition
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
(2012) - et al.
Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2006) - et al.
Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioral science: examining the progress of a distinctive model of behavioral and cognitive therapy
Behavior Therapy
(2013) - et al.
Acceptance and commitment therapy and yoga for drug refractory epilepsy: A randomized controlled Trial
Epilepsy and Behavior
(2008) The efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2014)- et al.
The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis and identification of patient subgroups
Pain
(2008) What does the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II) really measure?
Behavior Therapy
(2014)
Discovering structural equation modeling using Stata
A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Beck youth inventories second edition for children and adolescents manual
The work-related acceptance and action questionnaire: Initial psychometric findings and their implications for measuring psychological flexibility in specific contexts
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming
Coefficient Alpha and the internal structure of tests
Psychometrika
Cited by (39)
Assessing psychological flexibility and mental health in adults: The Psy-Flex European Portuguese version
2024, Journal of Contextual Behavioral ScienceThe role of psychological inflexibility in adolescent satisfaction with the educational track and school dropout intentions
2022, Journal of Contextual Behavioral ScienceThe moderating role of psychological inflexibility in the relationship between minority stress, substance misuse, and suicidality in LGB+ adolescents
2020, Journal of Contextual Behavioral ScienceDecreases in psychological inflexibility predict PTSD symptom improvement in inpatient adolescents
2020, Journal of Contextual Behavioral ScienceCitation Excerpt :We created a total score for each participant by summing responses to these items, and this variable was used for all analyses involving psychological inflexibility. Previous research on the psychometric properties of the AFQ-Y provide support for its internal consistency (alpha coefficients range from 0.88 to 0.93) (Greco et al., 2008; Livheim et al., 2016; Schramm, Venta, & Sharp, 2013) and construct, convergent, and concurrent validity (Greco et al., 2008; Venta, Sharp, & Hart, 2012). Livheim et al. (2016) reported a test-retest reliability of 0.82.
Persian adaptation of avoidance and fusion questionnaire for youth (AFQ-Y): A preliminary examination of its psychometric properties
2020, Journal of Contextual Behavioral ScienceCitation Excerpt :However, it was more strongly correlated with CF than with EA. This finding is consistent with the results of many past studies that have examined the convergent validity of the AFQ-Y (Christodoulou et al., 2018; Greco et al., 2008; Livheim et al., 2016; Muris et al., 2017). Greco et al. (2008) found that scores on the long and short forms of the AFQ-Y were moderately correlated with scores on the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) (−0.53 and −0.44, respectively) and WBSI (0.53 and 0.46, respectively).