Elsevier

Joint Bone Spine

Volume 86, Issue 1, January 2019, Pages 21-28
Joint Bone Spine

Recommendations and metaanalyses
French recommendations for osteoporosis prevention and treatment in patients with prostate cancer treated by androgen deprivation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.09.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with prostate cancer can be achieved surgically or chemically, notably by prescribing LHRH analogs. Major bone loss occurs rapidly in both cases, due to the decrease in testosterone levels, and can increase the fracture risk. The objective of developing these recommendations was to achieve a practical consensus among various scientific societies, based on a literature review, about osteoporosis prevention and treatment in patients on ADT. The following scientific societies contributed to the work: Société française de rhumatologie (SFR), Groupe de recherche et d’information sur les ostéoporoses (GRIO), Groupe européen d’études des métastases osseuses (GEMO), Association francophone pour les soins de support (AFSOS), Association française d’urologie (AFU), Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Medication prescription and reimbursement modalities in France were taken into account. The recommendations state that a fracture-risk evaluation and interventions targeting risk factors for fractures should be provided to all patients on ADT. Those patients with a history of severe osteoporotic fracture and/or a T-score < −2.5 should receive osteoporosis therapy. Patients whose T-score is between −1.5 and −2.5 should be treated if they exhibit at least two other risk factors among the following: age ≥ 75 years, history of non-severe fracture after 50 years of age, body mass index < 19 kg/m2, at least three comorbidities (e.g., cardiovascular disease, depression, Parkinson's disease, and dementia), current glucocorticoid therapy, and repeated falls. When the decision is difficult, FRAX® score determination and an assessment by a bone disease specialist may be helpful. When osteoporosis therapy is not indicated, general measures should be applied, and bone mineral density measured again after 12–24 months. The anti-tumor effects of bisphosphonates and denosumab fall outside the scope of these recommendations.

Introduction

Data collected in 2015 indicate that prostate cancer is by far the most common malignancy in males in continental France, with 53,913 new diagnoses per year, compared to 30,401 for lung cancer and 23,535 for colorectal cancer. The number of deaths due to cancer in males in continental France in 2015 was estimated at 84,041, with lung cancer being the leading cause (20,990 deaths), followed by colorectal cancer (9337 deaths) then by prostate cancer (8713 deaths) [1].

The treatment of localized prostate cancer depends on the risk of recurrence as determined based on the D’Amico risk classification [2], [3] (Table 1). The main treatment tools are radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, and pharmacological androgen-deprivation therapy (PADT, also known as chemical castration). PADT is used chiefly in patients who are at intermediate and high risk according to the D’Amico risk classification, have metastases, or experience a biochemical recurrence.

PADT is more widely used than surgical orchiectomy and usually consists in administering an analog of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), which binds to the pituitary LHRH receptors, thereby diminishing the production of LH and FSH and causing a drop in testosterone levels. A peripheral antiandrogen is given concomitantly for about 1 month to avoid initial transient stimulation of the pituitary with a flare-up of testosterone levels. In some situations, such as a risk of spinal cord compression, LHRH antagonists that directly block the pituitary LHRH receptors are given, as they cause no flare-up effect. Finally, peripheral antiandrogens can be used for PADT (Table 2).

The duration of PADT in patients with localized prostate cancer varies according to the level of risk, from about 6 months if the risk is intermediate [4], [5] to 18–36 months if the risk is high [6], [7]. In patients with metastatic disease, PADT can be given intermittently or continuously [8], [9], [10]. In the event of PADT resistance, continuous LHRH therapy is combined with second-generation hormone therapy (e.g., abiraterone [10] or enzalutamide [11]) or with cancer chemotherapy (e.g., docetaxel [12] or cabazitaxel [13]). Metabolic radiotherapy can also be used in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. In recent studies, radium–223 dichloride (Xofigo®, formerly Alpharadin®) increased the overall survival of patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer [14].

The most common adverse effects of PADT can be categorized as clinical (hot flashes, mastodynia, decreased size of the external genitalia, decreased libido, weight gain) and metabolic (insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia), increased risk of coronary artery disease, loss of muscle mass, and decreased hemoglobin levels) [15]. In addition, the decrease in testosterone levels induced by surgical or chemical castration causes major and rapid bone loss that predominantly affects the trabecular bone. Consequently, the fracture risk may increase, depending on patient age. Peripheral antiandrogens have no effects on bone, as they do not decrease the testosterone levels when used alone [15].

Section snippets

Objectives and methodology

These recommendations are intended for all physicians involved in the prevention and treatment of bone loss caused by ADT in patients with localized prostate cancer. The management of patients with bone metastases is outside the scope of these recommendations.

These recommendations discuss the principles underlying the pharmacological treatment of ADT-related bone loss, based on the efficacy and safety of each drug, as well as on current indications and reimbursement policies in France.

Risk of osteoporosis and bone loss

Most of the data on bone effects of ADT come from studies of patients managed with surgical orchiectomy or LHRH agonist therapy. The prevalence of osteoporosis in patients given LHRH analogs to treat prostate cancer varied between 10% and 40% depending on the characteristics of the study population and increased with age and treatment duration [18], [19], [20], reaching 80% after 10 years of drug exposure [19].

The annual rate of bone loss in males is usually 0.5% to 1% and increases in the

Evaluating the fracture risk in patients receiving androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT)

Several studies, most of which were done in patients receiving LHRH agonists, demonstrated rapid increases in the rate of bone loss and risk of fractures after the initiation of ADT. Therefore, the fracture risk should be evaluated in all patients at treatment initiation. If no baseline evaluation was performed and the patient has already received ADT, the fracture risk should be evaluated immediately (grade A).

The identification of patients at high risk for fractures relies on a multifactorial

Treatment prerequisites

The measures listed below are indispensable (professional consensus):

  • the patient should be evaluated for other known risk factors for osteoporosis, most notably those amenable to modification, including smoking, alcohol abuse, vitamin D deficiency, and inadequate dietary calcium intake;

  • other causes of bone fragility should be ruled out, in particular by standard blood tests including at least a full blood cell count and platelet count; erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein level;

Anti-osteoporosis treatment strategies

An individually tailored strategy is suggested for preventing ADT-related bone loss and fractures. Although bisphosphonates have been proven effective in preventing bone loss [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], only toremifene [67] and denosumab [68] have been demonstrated to prevent bone loss and decrease the fracture risk in men receiving ADT (Table 3). However, most of the studies of bisphosphonates were not sufficiently powered to detect a

Evaluation of treatment adherence

Treatments of osteoporosis, similar to all treatments for chronic diseases, work only if taken as prescribed. In several studies, poor adherence to osteoporosis therapy was associated with decreased efficacy. Clinical follow-up can be sufficient to assess treatment adherence (professional consensus).

Role for bone mineral density (BMD) measurements during follow-up

Given the rapid pace of bone loss during ADT, BMD values should be measured 12 to 24 months after the baseline evaluation in the absence of osteoporosis therapy, depending on the initial BMD values

Treatment safety

Clinical trials in patients with osteoporosis induced by LHRH agonist therapy included fewer patients and had shorter durations than those conducted in postmenopausal osteoporosis and male osteoporosis. Few data are available from patients given prolonged ADT. The safety profiles of bisphosphonates and denosumab seem comparable to those seen in postmenopausal and male osteoporosis. Importantly, no cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw or atypical femoral fracture were recorded during clinical

Disclosure of interest

JP, JB, BB, CC, JM HL, and RMJ declare that they have no competing interest.

KB: honoraria for work as an expert or speaker for Amgen, Lilly, Kyowa Kirin International, and MSD.

PB: honoraria for work as an expert or speaker for Amgen, Novartis, Bayer, Sanofi, Astellas, Janssen, and Roche.

CBC: honoraria for work as an expert or speaker for Lilly, Amgen, and Expanscience.

BC: honoraria for work as an expert or speaker for Amgen, Expanscience, Ferring, Lilly, MSD, Medtronic, Meda, and Roche

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the review group composed by: Jean-Jaques Body (internal medicine, Brussels, Belgium), Mario di Palma (medical oncology, Gustave-Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France) Fadila Farsi (oncology, Lyon, France), Pascal Guggenbuhl (rheumatology, Rennes, France), Jean-Léon Lagrange (radiotherapy, Créteil, France), Erick Legrand (rheumatology, Angers, France), Christian Marcelli (rheumatology, Caen, France), François Rozet (urological surgery, Institut Montsouris, Paris, France),

References (68)

  • HG Ahlborg et al.

    Incidence and risk factors for low trauma fractures in men with prostate cancer

    Bone

    (2008)
  • FA Conde et al.

    Age, body mass index, and serum prostate-specific antigen correlate with bone loss in men with prostate cancer not receiving androgen deprivation therapy

    Urology

    (2004)
  • A Angeli et al.

    High prevalence of asymptomatic vertebral fractures in post-menopausal women receiving chronic glucocorticoid therapy: a cross-sectional outpatient study

    Bone

    (2006)
  • PJ Saylor et al.

    Factors associated with vertebral fractures in men treated with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

    J Urol

    (2011)
  • P Dargent-Molina et al.

    Fall-related factors and risk of hip fracture: the EPIDOS prospective study

    Lancet

    (1996)
  • K Bylow et al.

    Obese frailty, physical performance deficits, and falls in older men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy: a case-control study

    Urology

    (2011)
  • JA Shepherd et al.

    Executive summary of the 2015 ISCD position development conference on advanced measures from DXA and QCT: fracture prediction beyond BMD

    J Clin Densitom

    (2015)
  • WD Leslie et al.

    Application of the 1994 WHO classification to populations other than postmenopausal Caucasian women: the 2005 ISCD official positions

    J Clin Densitom

    (2006)
  • K Briot et al.

    Male osteoporosis: diagnosis and fracture risk evaluation

    Joint Bone Spine

    (2009)
  • L Yin et al.

    Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies: serum vitamin D and prostate cancer risk

    Cancer Epidemiol

    (2009)
  • MR Smith et al.

    Randomized controlled trial of zoledronic acid to prevent bone loss in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer

    J Urol

    (2003)
  • CW Ryan et al.

    Zoledronic acid initiated during the first year of androgen deprivation therapy increases bone mineral density in patients with prostate cancer

    J Urol

    (2006)
  • N Bhoopalam et al.

    Intravenous zoledronic acid to prevent osteoporosis in a veteran population with multiple risk factors for bone loss on androgen deprivation therapy

    J Urol

    (2009)
  • R Choo et al.

    Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, trial of risedronate for the prevention of bone mineral density loss in nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients receiving radiation therapy plus androgen deprivation therapy

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2013)
  • MR Smith et al.

    Toremifene to reduce fracture risk in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

    J Urol

    (2010)
  • Les cancers en France/Edition 2016. Institut National du Cancer....
  • AV D’Amico et al.

    Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

    JAMA

    (1998)
  • Guide – Affection de longue durée. Cancer de la prostate. HAS/INCa Janvier 2012....
  • AV D’Amico

    6-month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy versus radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial

    JAMA

    (2004)
  • M Bolla

    Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2009)
  • J Crook

    Intermittent androgen suppression for rising PSA level after radiotherapy

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • Hussain

    Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2013)
  • JS de Bono

    Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2011)
  • TM Beer

    Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy

    N Engl J Med

    (2014)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Preserving bone in cancers of the elderly: A necessity

      2024, Revue du Rhumatisme (Edition Francaise)
    • French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: prostate cancer - Management of metastatic disease and castration resistance

      2022, Progres en Urologie
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ces caractéristiques imposent d’effectuer une évaluation spécifique de chaque patient, dès la mise en place du traitement et durant le suivi, telle que résumée dans le Tableau 3 [8–15]. Une consultation rhumatologique (±gériatrique) est souhaitable avant l’initiation de l’hormonothérapie car des traitements anti-résorptifs peuvent être proposés par le rhumatologue en fonction de l’évaluation clinique, biologique et de la densité osseuse : acide zolédronique (IV 4 mg/an), risédronate (35 mg/semaine ou 75 mg 2comprimés/mois), alendronate (70 mg/semaine) ou encore le dénosumab (PROLIA®) sous-cutané (60 mg semestriel) à une dose et un rythme différents de l’indication au stade CPRCm (dénosumab 120 mg mensuel, XGEVA®) [7]. En cas d’arrêt du dénosumab, une recrudescence des événements fracturaires peut être observée (effet rebond).

    • Male osteoporosis: Recommendations to improve its treatment

      2022, Revue du Rhumatisme (Edition Francaise)
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These two authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text