Effect of rocker shoe radius on oxygen consumption rate in young able-bodied persons
Introduction
Rocker shoes are used frequently in physical medicine and rehabilitation to treat ailments of the lower limb (see review by Hutchins et al. (2009)). Most studies have focused on the effects of rocker shoes on plantar pressures (Nawoczenski et al., 1988, Schaff and Cavanagh, 1990, Mueller et al., 1997, Postema et al., 1998, van Schie et al., 2000, Praet and Louwerens, 2003, Brown et al., 2004), while others have focused on the effects of rocker shoes on kinematics and kinetics of gait (Peterson et al., 1985, Wu et al., 2004, Van Bogart et al., 2005, Myers et al., 2006, Long et al., 2007). Few investigators have examined the effects of rocker shoes on energetic cost during walking.
Perry et al. (1981) studied the effectiveness of a rocker bottom shoe for restoring walking function for several women with multiple sclerosis. The rocker shoes were found to be beneficial to three women in the study with “obstructive spasticity,” helping them improve their self-selected walking speed from 55% to 103% of able-bodied walking speeds. When switching from normal shoes to rocker shoes, energy cost in this subject group was reduced from 717% to 93% of the cost used by able-bodied persons.
Adamczyk et al. (2006) examined the effects of using rigid rocker boots with immobilized ankles on metabolic rate of able-bodied ambulators. They found that the subjects walked with a minimum metabolic rate when the rocker radius was approximately 0.3 times the leg length compared to other rocker radii. Adamczyk et al. (2006) also found that the metabolic rate was higher with rigid rocker boots (and any of the rockers studied) than normal metabolic rates with unconstrained ankles. The research group later attributed this difference in energy cost to the weight of the boots (Vanderpool et al., 2008) and stated that use of an appropriate rocker shape with an immobilized ankle “need not increase energy expenditure for walking.”
A recent study by van Engelen et al. (2010) compared the metabolic energy cost of able-bodied persons walking with normal walking shoes and MBT rocker bottom shoes and found a higher metabolic energy cost when walking with the MBT shoes. The group postulated that the increase in metabolic cost may be due to the soft heel region of the MBT shoes, which likely caused instability and increased lower limb muscle activity in early stance and which coincided with higher external mechanical work lost in the “collision” phase. The group also cited the increased weight of the MBT shoes compared with the normal shoes as a potential factor leading to increased metabolic energy cost. It is possible that use of rocker bottom shoes with less compliance in the heel could provide different results. Also, no studies to our knowledge have investigated the effects of different rocker shoe radii (with unconstrained ankles) on oxygen consumption during walking.
The purpose of this study was to examine the oxygen consumption of young able-bodied persons walking using a series of rocker shoes with different rocker radii to determine whether certain radii would provide an energetic benefit. The rocker shoes had soles of uniform hardness and density for the heel and forefoot. We also examined the effects associated with adding the weight and height of the rocker soles by including the same shoe type without the addition of the rocker sole in the study.
Section snippets
Methods
Eleven subjects participated in the study (six males and five females). The subjects had an average (standard deviation) age of 28(4) years, height of 176(10) cm, and mass of 71(14) kg. The subjects were primarily graduate students at the Northwestern University.
Subjects first went through a consent process approved by the Northwestern University Institutional Review Board and provided written consent at the end of the process. Ankle strength and passive range of motion (non-weight bearing) were
Results
The shoes significantly affected oxygen consumption rate (p<0.001; see Fig. 2). Pairwise comparisons indicated that less oxygen (per minute per kg of body mass) was consumed when walking with the R40 shoes compared with the FLAT shoes (p<0.001) and also compared with the REG shoes (p=0.021). Oxygen consumption was also reduced when walking with the R25 shoes compared with the FLAT shoes (p=0.005) and when walking with the R55 shoes compared with the FLAT shoes (p=0.027). No other conditions
Discussion
Users who walked with rocker shoes with a radius of 40% of leg length (R40) had reduced oxygen consumption rates compared with using flat rocker shoes, regardless of lift (REG and FLAT). Users also had reductions in oxygen consumption rate when using either of the other rocker shoes (R25 or R55) compared with the FLAT shoes, but not compared with the REG shoes. The R40 shoes were not found to significantly reduce oxygen consumption compared with the R25 or R55 shoes. A trend is seen in the data
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the use of the VA Chicago Motion Analysis Research Laboratory. We would like to thank Rebecca Stine for her help with data collection and analysis, Stefania Fatone for her critical review of the manuscript, Kathy Waldera for her help with making the rocker shoes, and Sara Koehler and Brian Ruhe for their help with statistics used in this study. This publication was made possible by Grant number R03-HD050428-01A2 from the NIH. Its contents are solely the
References (28)
- et al.
Rocker bottom soles alter the postural response to backward translation during stance
Gait Posture
(2009) - et al.
Effect of rocker soles on plantar pressures
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
(2004) - et al.
Roll-over shapes of human locomotor systems: effects of walking speed
Clinical Biomechanics
(2004) - et al.
Effective rocker shapes used by able-bodied persons for walking and fore-aft swaying: implications for design of ankle-foot prostheses
Gait Posture
(2010) - et al.
The biomechanics and clinical efficacy of footwear adapted with rocker profiles–evidence in the literature
Foot (Edinb)
(2009) - et al.
Biomechanics of the double rocker sole shoe: gait kinematics and kinetics
Journal of Biomechanics
(2007) - et al.
Biomechanical implications of the negative heel rocker sole shoe: gait kinematics and kinetics
Gait Posture
(2006) - et al.
Metabolic cost and mechanical work during walking after tibiotalar arthrodesis and the influence of footwear
Clinical Biomechanics
(2010) - et al.
Ankle fixation need not increase the energetic cost of human walking
Gait Posture
(2008) - et al.
Response of able-bodied persons to changes in shoe rocker radius during walking: changes in ankle kinematics to maintain a consistent roll-over shape
Journal of Biomechanics
(2010)
The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait
Gait Posture
The effects of rocker sole and SACH heel on kinematics in gait
Medical Engineering and Physics
The advantages of a rolling foot in human walking
Journal of Experimental Biology
Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Cited by (14)
Rocker-profile design shoes improve pendular energy recovery in walking with no effects on total mechanical work
2022, Journal of BiomechanicsEffect of high heel gait on hip and knee-ankle-foot rollover characteristics while walking over inclined surfaces — A pilot study
2019, FootCitation Excerpt :The effective translation of the foot about the hip, knee and ankle joints generates a curved shape, i.e. the rollover shape, corresponding to the stance phase of the gait cycle. These rollover shapes have been determined and analysed for the knee-ankle-foot (KAF) and hip-ankle foot systems, in multiple studies by Curtze et al. and Hansen et al., to investigate the effects of healthy limbs, prosthetics, shoes (including high-heels) on level ground walking [7–15]. In a related study it has been concluded by Hansen and Childress that the rollover shapes for healthy participants do not change significantly upon changing the shoe heel heights as the ankle-foot systems adapt to the varying conditions [16].
Rocker shoe, minimalist shoe, and standard running shoe: A comparison of running economy
2014, Journal of Science and Medicine in SportCitation Excerpt :In one study no changes in metabolic cost between rocker bottom shoes and standard shoes were observed.6 One study reported an increase in energy expenditure during walking with rocker shoes compared with standard shoes,7 and the opposite was found in another study.8 The minimalist shoe is a rather new type of footwear, gaining popularity among runners.
Rollover footwear affects lower limb biomechanics during walking
2014, Gait and PostureCitation Excerpt :Effects at the level of the whole body (energy, walking speed) were also negligible. Others have reported some differences in these data with MBT [4,7,9,10]. However, we believe that 6 min of uninterrupted walking at a self selected speed is a superior protocol compared to treadmill walking at a fixed speed since it reflects real world use of footwear, and is thus a better approach to measurement of energy expenditure [9,10].
Modelling the effect of 'heel to toe' roll-over contact on the walking dynamics of passive biped robots
2013, Applied Mathematical Modelling