Mediators of the relationship between social anxiety and post-event rumination

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.10.008Get rights and content

Abstract

A variety of cognitive and attentional factors are hypothesised to be associated with post-event rumination, a key construct that has been proposed to contribute to the maintenance of social anxiety disorder (SAD). The present study aimed to explore factors contributing to post-event rumination following delivery of a speech in a clinical population. 121 participants with SAD completed measures of trait social anxiety a week before they undertook a speech task. After the speech, participants answered several questionnaires assessing their state anxiety, self-evaluation of performance, perceived focus of attention and probability and cost of expected negative evaluation. One-week later, participants completed measures of negative rumination experienced over the week. Results showed two pathways leading to post-event rumination: (1) a direct path from trait social anxiety to post-event rumination and (2) indirect paths from trait social anxiety to post-event rumination via its relationships with inappropriate attentional focus and self-evaluation of performance. The results suggest that post event rumination is at least partly predicted by the extent to which socially anxious individuals negatively perceive their own performance and their allocation of attentional resources to this negative self-image. Current findings support the key relationships among cognitive processes proposed by cognitive models.

Highlights

► We examined factors contributing to post-event rumination following a speech task in a clinical population with social anxiety disorder using path analysis methods. ► A direct path from trait social anxiety to post-event rumination was observed. ► Indirect paths from trait social anxiety to post-event rumination via its relationships with inappropriate attentional focus and self-evaluation of performance were also obtained. ► The results support cognitive models of the relationships and interactions between cognitive processes proposed to maintain negative rumination in social phobia.

Introduction

Post-event processing refers to a tendency for socially anxious individuals to engage in a repetitive, detailed review of negative aspects of their performance after they encounter anxiety-provoking social situations. This process is seen as a core maintaining factor of the anxiety experienced by people with social anxiety disorder (SAD) by consolidating the individual's negative beliefs about themselves and the social world (Clark & Wells, 1995). According to Clark and Wells (1995), following a social event, a socially anxious individual undertakes a detailed mental rehearsal of that event. The mental rehearsal is dominated by the individual's anxious feelings and negative self-appraisals that were processed during the event and this enhances the salience of the individual's negative beliefs. Consequently, the further consolidation of these beliefs contributes to increased anticipatory anxiety, negative affect and negative interpretations of social situations. As a result, the fear of social situations is maintained. The term post-event rumination has also been used for the same phenomenon (Abbott and Rapee, 2004, Edwards et al., 2003).

To date, studies have demonstrated that people with SAD engage in elevated levels of post-event rumination (Abbott and Rapee, 2004, Rachman et al., 2000; for a review see Brozovich & Heimberg, 2008). Previous studies have also shown that post-event rumination is associated with more negative self appraisals of performance and more intense social anxiety (Abbott and Rapee, 2004, Dannahy and Stopa, 2007, Rapee and Abbott, 2007). However, most research on cognitive processes in SAD has examined processes in isolation rather than assessing the interactions among key processes (Hirsch, Mathews, & Clark, 2007). Understanding how post-event processing is related to other aspects of cognitive models of SAD and how it maintains social anxiety awaits further examination (Brozovich and Heimberg, 2008, Kocovski and Rector, 2008).

To date, little is known about how other processes posited by cognitive models (Clark and Wells, 1995, Rapee and Heimberg, 1997) interact with post-event processing to maintain social anxiety. Most research has provided correlational support for specific aspects of the models but an integrative perspective is lacking. To our knowledge, only one study has examined the relationships between cognitive processes in social anxiety disorder from an integrative perspective (Rapee & Abbott, 2007). In this study investigating mediators between characteristic (trait) social anxiety and performance recall in response to a speech, it was found that cognitive processes such as perception of speech performance, perceived negative consequences and negative rumination mediated the relationship between trait social anxiety and performance recall (Rapee & Abbott, 2007). However, this study focused on the factors that impact situational anxiety and associated performance recall a week later; questions remain regarding the factors that contribute to post-event rumination in maintaining social anxiety.

Research investigating predictors of post-event rumination have provided some suggestions to explain how other factors may impact levels of post-event processing. Studies have consistently revealed that the severity of social anxiety and negative self-appraisals of social performance significantly predict post-event rumination in the week following a social performance (Abbott and Rapee, 2004, Kocovski and Rector, 2008, Laposa and Rector, 2011, Perini et al., 2006). Recent studies have attempted to include broader trait-like and task-based cognitive behavioural variables in order to identify potential factors that impact post-event rumination. Laposa and Rector (2011) examined several potential predictors of post-event processing following videotaped exposures during a cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) programme for clinical populations with SAD. In addition to severity of social anxiety prior to treatment, state anxiety during the videotaping, anxious rumination, fear of discomfort to others, and the interpretation of positive social events were positively and significantly related to post-event processing. Consistent results were obtained by Makkar and Grisham (2011) who investigated post-event processing following both a speech task and a conversation task. After undertaking both tasks, 40 participants completed a series of questionnaires assessing cognitive, behavioural, and physiological processes that occurred during each task. Twenty-four hours later, post-event processing was assessed in response to both tasks. The results showed that higher levels of post-event processing one day later were correlated with higher levels of trait social anxiety, self-reported state anxiety during the task, greater self-focused attention, more frequent negative thoughts during the speech, and lower performance ratings.

Taken together, these studies demonstrated that in addition to trait social anxiety, state anxiety as well as cognitive processes such as self-appraisals of performance, attentional focus, and negative assumptions about self, others or the world during the social task are factors likely to be associated with post-event processing. However, even though these studies demonstrated that individual variables impact post-event processing, an underlying mechanism explaining the inter-relationship between these factors has yet to be explored.

The present study aims to investigate factors contributing to post-event rumination after a speech task in a clinical population of patients with SAD in order to obtain an integrative perspective on the mechanism underlying this key cognitive process. Specifically, in addition to trait social anxiety, we focus on the role of self-focused attention, situational anxiety, perceptions of speech performance, and the probability and cost of expected negative evaluation in relation to post-event rumination and investigate the extent to which these factors contribute to negative rumination. Fig. 1 shows our proposed model outlining the relationships between these variables. The direction of the paths was hypothesised based on previous research results and temporal relationships (rumination was measured one week after other variables). Apart from specific correlations between these factors and post-event processing (Abbott and Rapee, 2004, Kocovski and Rector, 2008, Laposa and Rector, 2011, Makkar and Grisham, 2011), previous studies have also shown several mediation relationships. For example, Perini et al. (2006) illustrated that perception of performance was a mediator in the relationship between trait social anxiety and post-event rumination. Rapee and Abbott (2007) found that perception of speech performance, perceived focus of attention and perceived negative consequences mediated the relationship between trait social anxiety and state anxiety. In their models, adding a path from inappropriate attentional focus to performance perception demonstrated a better model fit to the data than a model without this path. Furthermore, examination of the indirect paths indicated that inappropriate attentional focus played an important role in predicting state anxiety through performance perception and perceived negative probability and consequences.

Taking these results into account, we hypothesised that (1) trait social anxiety impacts post-event processing directly, (2) trait social anxiety impacts post-event processing through its relationships with inappropriate attentional focus, state anxiety, perception of speech performance, and the probability and cost of negative evaluation. Among these mediators, biased attentional focus was a factor of particular interest. Previous reviews have demonstrated the important role of selective attention in development and maintenance of social anxiety (Bogels and Mansell, 2004, Schultz and Heimberg, 2008, Spurr and Stopa, 2002). In addition, empirical evidence has also supported that biased attention focus (e.g., self-focused attention) can be modified through techniques that focus on redeploying attentional focus (Heeren et al., 2012, Li et al., 2008, Schmidt et al., 2009). Nevertheless, few studies have explored whether and how self-focussed attention impacts post-event processing. To our knowledge, only two studies have examined the impact of self-focused attention on post-event processing (Gaydukevych and Kocovski, 2012, Makkar and Grisham, 2011). However, the results were based on small samples of nonclinical participants. Accordingly, whether and how self-focused attention impacts levels of post-event processing in a clinical population warrants further investigation.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants were 121 individuals with a principal diagnosis of DSM-IV SAD (mean age = 34.05 years, SD = 12.21; male: 59) who sought assessment and cognitive behavioural treatment at the Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University. Diagnostic interviews were conducted by clinical psychologists and graduate students in clinical psychology who were trained to criterion by the clinic director in administration of the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV-TR (Di Nardo, Brown, & Barlow,

Descriptive statistics

Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics for the variables used in this study. As can be seen, all the variables showed reasonable spread.

Bivariate relationships

Bivariate Pearson correlations were calculated with each indicator utilised in the model to examine the association between variables. As presented in Table 2, all the correlations were statistically significant. Both trait social anxiety and all potential mediators showed moderate to strong correlations with post-event rumination.

Model testing

Based on the model

Discussion

The aim of this study was to examine factors influencing negative post-event rumination in response to a speech task in clinical participants with SAD. Based on the results from previous studies, we included factors such as state anxiety, self-evaluation of performance, the probability and cost of negative evaluation, and perceived focus of attention as potential cognitive and affective factors that mediated the relationship between degree of social anxiousness and engagement in post-event

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Pawel Skuza for help with statistical analyses and Jonathan Gaston for assistance with clinical management. Several outstanding research assistants also conducted testing, coding and data management, including Kristy Benoit, Leigh Carpenter, Susan Edwards, Amanda Gamble, Jordana McLoone, Sarah Perini, Julie Sposari, Lexine Stapinski, and Jennifer Waldron.

References (38)

Cited by (38)

  • Processes and pathways mediating the experience of social anxiety and negative rumination

    2018, Behaviour Research and Therapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    This is line with past research aiming to assess the construct of inappropriate attention during a speech task (Chen et al., 2013; Rapee & Abbott, 2007). The AFQ has been reported to have good psychometric properties (Rapee & Abbott, 2007) and excellent internal consistency for the total set of items that measures inappropriate attention (Chen et al., 2013). The AFQ was administered following the speech task and internal consistency for the total of the three utilised subscales in this study was excellent (α = .90).

  • Combined Audience and Video Feedback With Cognitive Review Improves State Anxiety and Self-Perceptions During Speech Tasks in Socially Anxious Individuals

    2018, Behavior Therapy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Participants were instructed to rate their anxiety during the speech on 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) rating scales, with higher scores indicating greater levels of state anxiety. The internal consistency of the SAR was very good (α = .96) and so was the convergent validity (r = .71–.72; Chen, Rapee, & Abbott, 2013; Rapee & Abbott, 2007). The internal consistency in the current study ranged from .92 to .95 at the three time points of assessment.

  • Negative rumination in social anxiety: A randomised trial investigating the effects of a brief intervention on cognitive processes before, during and after a social situation

    2017, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
    Citation Excerpt :

    In other words, the processes that maintain state social anxiety should also be in play when an individual with SAD engages in pre- and post-event rumination. Structural equation models have been devised that broadly support the relationship between cognitive processes proposed by models of SAD for state anxiety (Rapee & Abbott, 2007) and post-event rumination (Chen, Rapee, & Abbott, 2013). In order to investigate the process of rumination further, Penney and Abbott (2014) used hierarchal regression modelling to determine which cognitive processes predicted pre and post-event rumination, and those that best predicted state anxiety levels in relation to a speech task, with groups of participants with SAD and non-clinical controls.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This research was supported by National Health and Medical Research Council grant 192107 to Ronald M. Rapee.

View full text