The Italian version of the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory: Its psychometric properties on community and clinical samples
Introduction
Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a well-known form of psychopathology which is characterized by persistent, intrusive, and distressing obsessions (persistent thoughts, impulses, or images) or compulsions (repetitive, excessive behaviors or mental acts). Recent research on OCD underscores the considerable heterogeneity of this disorder. For example, in their review McKay et al. (2004) have identified as many as nine subtypes or replicable dimensions of OCD: contamination/washing, harming/checking, hoarding, symmetry/ordering, obsessionals, sexual and religious, certainty, sexual-somatic, and contamination/harming. Studies on OCD heterogeneity have several implications for researchers and clinicians, since obsessive compulsive (OC) subtypes may differentially relate to other clinical disorders, cognitive features, neuropsychological deficits, personality traits, sociodemographic aspects, and response to treatment (e.g., Baer, 1994; Mataix-Cols et al., 2002; Minichiello, Baer, Jenike, & Holland, 1990; Sher, Frost, Kushner, Crews, & Alexander, 1989; Simpson et al., 2006; Tolin, Woods, & Abramowitz, 2003).
The heterogeneity of OCD calls for instruments that reliably assess the various empirically based symptom presentations. One measure that has been purposely designed to correspond to symptom-based models of OCD and has received extensive empirical validation is the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory (OCI; Foa, Kozak, Salkovskis, Coles, & Amir, 1998). Two different versions of the OCI have been considered in the literature: (a) the original version composed by 42 items and seven rationally derived subscales (washing, checking, doubting, ordering, obsessing, hoarding, and mental neutralizing); (b) a short version containing 18 items and six subscales (washing, checking, ordering, obsessing, hoarding, and mental neutralizing), based on factor analysis of the OCI in a US clinical sample (OCI-R; Foa et al., 2002).
Several reports provided support for the reliability and validity of the OCI and OCI-R and showed strong convergence with established measures of OCD, moderate to high internal consistency across the various subscales, and adequate to high test–retest stability depending on the time interval (e.g., Abramowitz & Deacon, 2006; Huppert et al., 2007; Simonds, Thorpe, & Elliott, 2000). The internal structure of the OCI-R has been replicated in multiple languages including French (Zermatten, Van-der-Linden, Jermann, & Ceschi, 2006), German (Gonner, Leonhart, & Ecker, 2008), Icelandick (Smari, Olason, Eythorsdottir, & Frolunde, 2007), and Spanish (Fullana et al., 2005), whereas only one study concerned the factorial composition of the original OCI (Wu & Watson, 2003). In this study, based on a factor analysis in American undergraduate students, the authors suggested that a five-factor structure, rather than the seven rationally derived subscales, best captured the structure of symptoms measured by the OCI. In addition, Foa et al. (2002) also suggested that the proposed seven-factor structure of the original OCI may be in question.
In sum, what emerges from the literature is that the OCI-R is a robust measure of OC symptoms, whereas more studies are warranted for the OCI. On the other hand, the brevity of the OCI-R subscales (three items for each of the six dimensions) is of concern for some scholars (Clark, Antony, Beck, Swinson, & Steer, 2005), even though the OCI itself contains two dimensions composed by three items (hoarding and doubting). As such, it could be worthwhile examining both the long and short version of the questionnaire within the same study. To our knowledge, no studies have been conducted to compare the OCI and the OCI-R in a cultural context outside the US. Actually, if the OCI-R should show a stronger factor structure than OCI and good psychometric characteristics, then it would be possible to conclude that OCD may not vary substantially cross-culturally in this regard, and also may provide support for the use of the subscales of the OCI-R over the OCI. On the contrary, if a different picture would emerge (i.e., no substantial differences between the two versions or stronger characteristics of the OCI over the OCI-R), then potential cultural differences that may lead to this may be discussed.
The main purpose of the present study was therefore to evaluate the psychometric properties of both the OCI and the OCI-R on Italian community and clinical samples. Virtually no studies have tested the psychometric properties of the OCI and OCI-R on community samples, a surprising omission given theoretical assumptions that OC phenomena lie on a continuum from normality to psychopathology (e.g., Burns, Formea, Keortge, & Sternberger, 1995; Salkovskis & Harrison, 1984; Sterneberger & Burns, 1990). The OCI itself was devised to “provide an instrument that can be readily administered to both clinical and non-clinical populations” (Foa et al., 1998, p. 207). A large community sample permits study of the factor structure of the OCI, convergent and divergent validity, and examination of possible gender, age, and education effects on OCI total and subscale scores. Regarding this last issue, we hypothesized no differences in age and gender because several studies on self-reported obsessional features showed no differences across these characteristics (Kyrios, Bhar, & Wade, 1996; MacDonald & De Silva, 1999; Sterneberger & Burns, 1990).
Lastly, the clinical samples permit to evaluate the criterion-oriented and discriminant validity of the Italian version of the OCI.
Section snippets
Participants and procedure
Subjects were 340 community individuals (51% male) enrolled in four different middle-size towns of Northern Italy. All participants were Caucasian. The mean age of the sample was 33.3 (S.D. = 13; range = 16–60) and the mean years of education was 15.4 (S.D. = 3; range = 8–21). Marital status was 58.2% single, 37.9% married or cohabitating, 3% separated or divorced, and 0.9% widowed. The employment profile of the total sample was: 52.1% full-time job, 33.7% students, 3.8% part time job, 2.1% unemployed,
Data analysis
To test the different internal structures of the OCI, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on the community sample. The CFA was performed using LISREL 8.54 (Jöreskog & Sörbom, SSI INC, 2003). Since the observed variables were non-normally distributed, the matrix of polychoric correlations – instead of the covariance matrix – was analyzed with the weighted least squares method (Jöreskog & Sörbom, SSI INC, 2003). The goodness of fit was evaluated by the following criteria
Factors structure of the OCI
Consistent with many suggestions we elected to assess only distress associated with obsessions and compulsions, since the two scales set (i.e., distress and frequency) yield redundant information (e.g., Foa et al., 2002; Wu & Watson, 2003).
A CFA was performed on the community sample to test four models: (1) the original rationally derived seven factor structure (42 items): washing, checking, doubting, ordering, obsessing, hoarding, and mental neutralizing; (2) the six-factor structure of the
Discussion and conclusion
The OCI was specifically designed to address many of the concerns levied against existing instruments, such as narrowness of symptom subtypes addressed and unsatisfactory discriminant validity. As such, it seemed important to establish which version of the questionnaire best measures OCD symptoms.
With respect to internal structure of the questionnaire, a CFA performed on the community sample found evidence that the OCI consists of six subscales assessing washing, checking, ordering, obsessing,
Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful to Gail Steketee for advice on revision of the manuscript.
References (50)
- et al.
Psychometric properties and construct validity of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised: replication and extension with a clinical sample
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2006) - et al.
The utilization of non-patient samples in study of obsessive-compulsive disorder
Behavior Research and Therapy
(1995) - et al.
Revision of the Padua Inventory of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms: distinctions between worry, obsessions, and compulsions
Behavior Research and Therapy
(1996) - et al.
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised in a non-clinical sample
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2005) - et al.
The obsessive-compulsive inventory-revised (OCI-R): validation of the German version in a sample of patients with OCD, anxiety disorders, and depressive disorders
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2008) - et al.
The distinctiveness of compulsive hoarding from obsessive-compulsive disorder
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2005) - et al.
The OCI-R: validation of the subscales in a clinical sample
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2007) - et al.
The assessment of obsessive-compulsive phenomena: psychometric and normative data on the Padua Inventory from an Australian non clinical student sample
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1996) - et al.
The assessment of obsessionality using the Padua Inventory: its validity in a British non clinical sample
Personality and Individual Differences
(1999) - et al.
A critical evaluation of obsessive-compulsive disorder subtypes: symptoms versus mechanisms
Clinical Psychology Review
(2004)
Basic principles of ROC analysis
Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Age of onset of major subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder
Journal of Anxiety Disorder
Obsessional-compulsive problems: a cognitive-behavioral analysis
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Abnormal and normal obsessions—a replication
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Obsessions and compulsions: the Padua Inventory
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Memory deficits in sub-clinical checkers: replication and extension in a clinical sample
Behaviour Research and Therapy
A study of the psychometric properties of the Obsessive Beliefs Inventory and Interpretations of Intrusions Inventory on clinical Italian individuals
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Culture and psychopathology: superstition and obsessive-compulsive cognitions and symptoms in a non-clinical Italian sample
Personality and Individual Differences
OCD cognitions across cultures
Are there reliable neuropsychological deficits in OCD?
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Further investigation of the Obsessive beliefs Questionnaire: factor structure and specificity of relations with OCD symptoms
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Further investigation of the obsessive-compulsive inventory: psychometric analysis in two non-clinical samples
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Validation of a French version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised in a non-clinical sample
European Review of Applied Psychology
Factor analysis of symptom subtypes of obsessive compulsive disorder and their relation to personality and tic disorders
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Cited by (109)
Obsessive-compulsive symptoms and dimensional models of psychopathology: The contribution of “not just right experiences”
2024, Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive TherapyValidating the Italian version of the Adult Picky Eating Questionnaire
2022, Food Quality and PreferenceExploring the association between muscle dysmorphia and cognitive processing of human bodies: A pilot study
2024, Giornale Italiano di PsicologiaPathological narcissism and relationship obsessive-compulsive disorder (ROCD) symptoms: Exploring the role of vulnerable narcissism
2024, Journal of Clinical Psychology