Social anxiety and the interpretation of positive social events

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.05.007Get rights and content

Abstract

We report four independent studies that examined the relationship between social interaction anxiety and the tendency to interpret positive social events in a threat-maintaining manner. Study 1 described the development of a scale that measures negative interpretations of positive social events, the interpretation of positive events scale (IPES). Study 2 cross-validated the structure of the IPES and established that social interaction anxiety explained significant variance in negative interpretations of positive social events beyond negative affect in general. Study 3 demonstrated that negative interpretation of positive events was significantly greater in a clinical sample of patients with generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD) than a matched group of non-anxious community controls. In addition, within the GSAD group, the IPES was associated with negative social predictions following a positive interaction. Finally, study 4 confirmed that negative interpretations of positive social events mediated the relationship between social interaction anxiety and low positive affect.

Section snippets

Study 1

The first step in determining whether negative interpretations mediate the link between social anxiety and low PA was to develop a reliable and valid measure of the interpretation of positive events, and that was the goal of study 1. We began by asking people with GSAD to reflect on their reactions to positive social events. Their reports were converted to questionnaire items that were used to construct scales reflecting the dimensions that underlie those responses. We then examined the

Study 2

In study 2, we sought to cross-validate the factor structure of the IPES items and to continue to explore whether social interaction anxiety explained unique variance in threatening interpretations of positive events. Study 1 indicated that social interaction anxiety was associated with the IPES when variance attributable to depressive symptoms was controlled; however, it did not assess whether this negative interpretative style was a characteristic of anxiety in general. To address this issue,

Study 3

Studies 1 and 2 confirmed the prediction that social anxiety is associated with a tendency to interpret positive social events in a way that maintains a sense of threat. Both studies, however, relied on student samples, and there is a need to determine whether the results would extend to a clinical sample. Accordingly, in study 3, we examined the structural integrity and specificity of the IPES in a convenience sample of people seeking treatment for GSAD.

We were also interested in the effect of

Study 4

We began this research with the observation that social anxiety was associated with low positive affect (Brown et al., 1998, Kashdan, 2002, Kashdan, 2004), and speculated on the factors that might explain this link. In particular, we hypothesized that the association between social anxiety and low positive affect may be due in part to the tendency to interpret positive events in a manner than maintains rather than reduces a sense of threat (see Gilboa-Schechtman et al., 2000; Hirsch & Mathews,

References (52)

  • S.M. Orsillo et al.

    Social phobia and response to challenge procedures: examining the interaction between anxiety sensitivity and trait anxiety

    Journal of Anxiety Disorders

    (1994)
  • R.A. Peterson et al.

    The anxiety sensitivity index: construct validity and factor analytic structure

    Journal of Anxiety Disorders

    (1987)
  • R.M. Rapee et al.

    A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1997)
  • S. Reiss

    Expectancy model of fear, anxiety, and panic

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (1991)
  • S. Reiss et al.

    Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency, and the prediction of fearfulness

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1986)
  • S. Taylor et al.

    How does anxiety sensitivity vary across the anxiety disorders?

    Journal of Anxiety Disorders

    (1992)
  • K.A. Veljaca et al.

    Detection of negative and positive audience behaviours by socially anxious subjects

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1998)
  • Alden, L. E., & Mellings, T. M. B. (2000). Social phobia and the interpretation of positive events. Paper presented at...
  • L.E. Alden et al.

    Social phobia and social appraisal in successful and unsuccessful interactions

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1995)
  • R.M. Baron et al.

    The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Beck depression inventory-II

    (1996)
  • T.A. Brown et al.

    Structural relationships among dimensions of DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders and dimensions of negative affect, positive affect, and autonomic arousal

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1998)
  • T.A. Brown et al.

    Anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM-IV

    (1994)
  • E.J. Brown et al.

    Validation of the social interaction anxiety scale and the social phobia scale across anxiety disorders

    Psychological Assessment

    (1997)
  • B.F. Chorpita et al.

    Relations of tripartite dimensions of emotions to childhood anxiety and mood disorders

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (2000)
  • D.M. Clark

    A cognitive perspective on social phobia

  • Cited by (117)

    • Differential participation in community cultural activities amongst those with poor mental health: Analyses of the UK Taking Part Survey

      2020, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, we specifically looked at a relatively general pool of participants: the 15% of the sample reporting highest levels of daily anxious feelings. It is likely that a more specific analysis of individuals with more anxiety-related mental illness (e.g., social anxiety disorder) may have different patterns of response and cultural engagement behaviours (Alden et al., 2008). Overall, this study has some significant strengths.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text