Original article
Intergenerational Trauma: The Relationship Between Residential Schools and the Child Welfare System Among Young People Who Use Drugs in Vancouver, Canada

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.01.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the relationship between familial residential school system (RSS) exposure and personal child welfare system (CWS) involvement among young people who use drugs (PWUD).

Methods

Data were obtained from two linked cohorts of PWUD in Vancouver, Canada, and restricted to Indigenous participants. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between three categories of familial RSS exposure (none, grandparent, and parent) and CWS involvement. A secondary analysis assessed the likelihood of CWS involvement between non-Indigenous and Indigenous PWUD with no familial RSS exposure.

Results

Between December 2011 and May 2016, 675 PWUD (aged <35 years) were included in this study, 40% identified as Indigenous. In multivariable analyses, compared with Indigenous participants with no RSS exposure (reference), those with a grandparent in the RSS had a higher likelihood of having been in CWS (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .67–2.71), as did those with a parent exposed to RSS (AOR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.03–3.99). In secondary analysis, the odds of CWS involvement was not significantly different between non-Indigenous and Indigenous PWUD with no familial RSS exposure (AOR = .63, 95% CI: .38–1.06).

Conclusions

We observed a dose–response–type trend between familial RSS exposure and personal CWS involvement and a nonsignificant difference in the likelihood of CWS involvement between Indigenous and non-Indigenous PWUD when controlling for RSS exposure. These data demonstrate the intergenerational impact of the RSS on the overrepresentation of Indigenous youth in the CWS. Findings have critical implications for public policy and practice including reconciliation efforts with Indigenous Peoples.

Section snippets

Methods

Data for this study were collected between December 1, 2011, and May 31, 2016, from two prospective cohorts of PWUD (i.e., the At-Risk Youth Study [ARYS] and the Vancouver Injection Drug Users Study [VIDUS]), with harmonized procedures for recruitment, follow-up, and data collection in Vancouver, Canada. Study rationale and procedures for ARYS and VIDUS have been described elsewhere in detail [28], [29]. In brief, to be eligible, participants must reside in the greater Vancouver region, have

Results

Over our study period, 675 PWUD (age <35 years) were enrolled in VIDUS and ARYS and eligible for these analyses. Among this sample, 259 (38.4%) were female, and the median age at baseline was 23.3 (Interquartile range [IQR]: 21.1–27.4) years. Among the 267 (39.6%) participants who identified as being of Indigenous ancestry, 179 (67.0%) were First Nations, 29 (10.7%) were Métis, and 9 (3.4%) identified as Aboriginal (no participants identified as Inuit). Among Indigenous participants, 90 (18.1%)

Discussion

We observed a dose–response–type trend between familial residential school exposure and having been personally involved with the CWS among younger Indigenous PWUD. Participants who had either a parent (or grandparent and parent) that attended a residential school were found to have more than two times the odds of having been in government care. Those with a grandparent (but no parent) that attended a residential school also had increased odds of being in care; however, this association did not

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the study participants for their contribution to the research, as well as current and past researchers and staff. The authors would specifically like to thank Carly Ho, Jennifer Matthews, Peter Vann, Steve Kain, and Marina Abramishvili for their research and administrative assistance. The authors respectfully acknowledge that this study was undertaken on the unceded territories of the xʷməθkwəỷəm (Musqueam), Skwxwú7mesh (Squamish), and Səľílwətaʔ/Selilwitulh (Tsleil-Waututh)

References (39)

  • Volume 1: Looking forward, looking back

    (1996)
  • D. Nock

    A Victorian missionary and Canadian Indian policy: Cultural synthesis vs cultural replacement

    (1988)
  • N. Trocme et al.

    Pathways to the overrepresentation of aboriginal children in Canada's child welfare system

    Soc Serv Rev

    (2004)
  • H.A. McKenzie et al.

    Disrupting the continuities among residential schools, the Sixties Scoop, and child welfare: An analysis of colonial and neocolonial discourses

    Int Indig Policy J

    (2016)
  • V. Sinha et al.

    The structure of Aboriginal child welfare in Canada

    Int Indig Policy J

    (2013)
  • C. Blackstock et al.

    Community-based child welfare for aboriginal children: Supporting resilience through structural change

    Soc Pol J N Z

    (2005)
  • Children in care

  • A. Bombay et al.

    The intergenerational effects of Indian residential schools: Implications for the concept of historical trauma

    Transcult Psychiatry

    (2014)
  • M.Y.H. Brave Heart et al.

    Historical trauma among Indigenous Peoples of the Americas: Concepts, research, and clinical considerations

    J Psychoactive Drugs

    (2011)
  • Cited by (25)

    • An update on ACEs domain frequencies across race/ethnicity and sex in a nationally representative sample

      2022, Child Abuse and Neglect
      Citation Excerpt :

      Empirical studies have also examined the associations between historical trauma, ACEs, and mental and physical health outcomes among Indigenous populations in the U.S. and Canada. Broadly, this research has documented that the intergenerational impacts of forced relocation and boarding school involvement have been associated with a range of harrowing outcomes, including greater prevalence of ACEs, delinquency, and child welfare system involvement among Indigenous children and youth, as well as greater perceived discrimination, trauma, depression symptoms, poly-substance use, and suicidality among Indigenous adults (Barker et al., 2019; Bombay et al., 2011; Brockie et al., 2015; McQuaid et al., 2017; Walls & Whitbeck, 2012). Prior ACEs-relevant literature has identified that prevalence of child abuse and neglect are high among some AI/AN communities, and substance use, specifically alcohol use, is high among some AI/AN communities and is associated with the vast majority of abuse cases (Hawkins et al., 2004; Landen et al., 2014; Lujan et al., 1989).

    • Medication for Adolescents and Young Adults With Opioid Use Disorder

      2021, Journal of Adolescent Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similar to the U.S., other European countries have regulations on who can prescribe buprenorphine and methadone. Other barriers worldwide include requirements for prior authorizations for buprenorphine and naltrexone, insufficient number of addiction treatment programs that offer MOUD to AYAs, lack of health insurance among AYAs, high copays for medications and clinical visits, and pervasive and persistent disparities in offered treatment and access to health care by race and ethnicity [25–27]. These striking disparities are linked to the complex intersection of historical injustices, culture, and policies [26,28].

    • At the breaking point: The impact of mass incarceration on families

      2023, Mass Incarceration in the 21st Century: Realities and Reflections
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

    Disclaimer: Funding sources had no further role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

    View full text