Original article
Sexual Behaviors and Partner Characteristics by Sexual Identity Among Adolescent Girls

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.11.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

Data suggest that lesbian and bisexual adolescents engage in risky sexual behaviors at higher rates than heterosexual girls. Whether these findings also apply to girls of other sexual identities is less well understood. Potential differences in risky sexual behaviors reported by lesbian versus bisexual adolescents are also underreported in the literature.

Methods

Data were collected online in 2010–2011 among 2,823 girls, aged 13–18 years, in the United States. Multinomial logistic regression was used to quantify comparisons of sexual behaviors between (1) lesbian; (2) bisexual; and (3) questioning, unsure, or other (QUO) identity; and (0) heterosexual girls. Logistic regression compared lesbian and bisexual adolescents.

Results

Lesbian and bisexual adolescents reported significantly more lifetime and past-year sexual partners than heterosexual girls. Bisexual girls were also more likely to report penile-anal and penile-vaginal sex, whereas lesbians were more likely to report earlier sexual debut for almost all types of sex, as compared to heterosexual girls. Lesbians also were more likely to report infrequent condom use and less likely to have conversations with partners about the use of barriers (e.g., dental dams) before first sex. Relative to lesbians, bisexual girls reported older age at first sex for almost all sexual behaviors and higher lifetime prevalence of recent male partners, penile-vaginal, and penile-anal sex. Few differences were noted between QUO and heterosexual girls.

Conclusions

Sexual minority adolescents are not identical in terms of sexual risk. Providers need to be sensitive to these differences and their implications for health and counseling of patients.

Section snippets

Methods

Data are from the Teen Health and Technology Study, an online, national survey of LGB and transgender (LGBT) and non-LGBT adolescents, aged 13–18 years, in the United States. The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Chesapeake Institutional Review Board (IRB), the University of New Hampshire IRB, and the Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network (GLSEN) Research Ethics Review Committee. Minors provided informed assent, and 18-year-olds provided consent. The IRBs granted a waiver of

Results

Most participants identified as heterosexual (65%, n = 1,842; note: all percentages in this paragraph are unweighted). Reflective of the recruitment strategy to oversample sexual minority youth, over a third identified as lesbian (13%, n = 364), bisexual (16%, n = 456), queer (.5%, n = 13), and QUO (5%, n = 148; numbers sum greater than 100% due to rounding).

Demographic characteristics were mostly similar across sexual identities (Table 1; note: all percentages forward in the Results section

Discussion

In this large national study detailing the sexual behaviors of lesbian, bisexual, QUO, and heterosexually identified girls aged 13–18 years, findings indicate that sexual behaviors and experiences vary by sexual identity. Lesbian and bisexual adolescents both report more lifetime and past-year sexual partners than heterosexual girls. Similar to previous literature [3], [24], one in five lesbians' most recent sexual partner was male, as is true for four in five bisexual girls. As perhaps might

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the entire study team from the Center for Innovative Public Health Research (formerly Internet Solutions for Kids), the University of New Hampshire, the Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network (GLSEN), La Trobe University, and Harris Interactive, who contributed to the planning and implementation of the study. The authors also thank the study participants for their time and willingness to participate in this study. Authors are listed in order of contribution.

References (45)

  • E. Saewyc et al.

    Stigma management? The links between enacted stigma and teen pregnancy trends among gay, lesbian, and bisexual students in British Columbia

    Can J Hum Sex

    (2008)
  • L. Kann et al.

    Sexual identity, sex of sexual contacts, and health-risk behaviors among students in grades 9-12–Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance, selected sites, United States, 2001-2009

    MMWR Surveill Summ

    (2011)
  • M. Rosario et al.

    Sexual-orientation disparities in cancer-related risk behaviors of tobacco, alcohol, sexual behaviors, and diet and physical activity: Pooled Youth Risk Behavior Surveys

    Am J Public Health

    (2014)
  • S. Maguen et al.

    Prevalence of unprotected sex and HIV-antibody testing among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youth

    J Sex Res

    (2000)
  • M. Rosario et al.

    Sexual risk behavior of gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths in New York City: Prevalence and correlates

    AIDS Educ Prev

    (1999)
  • E.M. Saewyc et al.

    Sexual intercourse, abuse and pregnancy among adolescent women: Does sexual orientation make a difference?

    Fam Plann Perspect

    (1999)
  • E. Saewyc

    Adolescent pregnancy among lesbian, gay and bisexual teens

  • D. Singh et al.

    Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women reporting sexual activity with women screened in Family Planning Clinics in the Pacific Northwest, 1997 to 2005

    Am J Public Health

    (2011)
  • Assessing the representativeness of public opinion surveys

    (2012)
  • M. Madden et al.

    Teens and mobile apps privacy

    (2013)
  • M.L. Ybarra et al.

    A national study of lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB), and non-LGB youth sexual behavior online and in-person

    Arch Sex Behav

    (2015)
  • Teen health and technology

    (2015)
  • Cited by (36)

    • “Even if you think you can trust them, don't trust them”: An exploratory analysis of the lived experiences of sexual health among sexual minority girls in foster care

      2020, Children and Youth Services Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      For instance, National Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) data indicate that sexual minority girls are significantly more likely to ever have had sex, have had sexual intercourse for the first time before age 13, have had lifetime sexual intercourse with four or more persons, be currently sexually active, and not have used a condom during last sexual intercourse, compared to heterosexual girls (Kann et al., 2018). These findings are in line with previous research that highlights elevated rates of risky sexual practices among sexual minority girls compared to heterosexual girls (Everett et al., 2019; Goodenow, Szalacha, Robin, & Westheimer, 2008; Poteat, Russell, & Dewaele, 2019; Rasberry et al., 2018; Ybarra, Rosario, Saewyc, & Goodenow, 2016). Elevated sexual health risk behaviors among sexual minority girls have been attributed to increased rates of childhood sexual and physical abuse (Saewyc, Poon, Homma, & Skay, 2008; Scheer, McConocha, Behari, & Pachankis, 2019).

    • A Cross-sectional Study Examining the (In)congruency of Sexual Identity, Sexual Behavior, and Romantic Attraction among Adolescents in the US

      2019, Journal of Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is important to note that the meaning of identity labels may be different for different youth. For example, the meaning of “queer” has been noted for its ambiguity in the scientific literature.47,48 Findings here suggest that it may be different for boys and girls; for girls, it seems to most often connote dual romantic attraction, whereas for boys it seems to connote same-sex romantic attraction.

    • Emotional and behavioral problems among sexual minority youth in Thailand

      2019, Asian Journal of Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Students who were not sure or questioning regarding their own gender identity reported significantly lower behavioral problem scores than the lesbian/gay and the bisexual groups without statistically significant differences compared to the straight group. The finding was consistent with a recent study that reported similar rates of risky sexual behaviors for questioning girls to those of heterosexual girls (Ybarra et al., 2016). This may be because questioning youth are still considering their gender identity and therefore are not yet “coming out” on their gender role, resulting in less discrimination from straight communities and less emotional and behavioral problems than other sexual minority subgroups.

    • African-American sexual minority adolescents and sexual health disparities: An exploratory cross-sectional study

      2019, Journal of the National Medical Association
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, by operationalizing vaginal and anal sexual acts as penile-vaginal or penile-anal acts, we provided a definition to participants to guide interpretability; however, this might have led to an underestimate of SMA, particularly those with only same-sex experience, who were excluded from analyses. For example, lesbian-identified girls are less likely to have engaged in penile sex acts.33 Further, it is possible that we classified some youth as heterosexual who held non-heterosexual attractions or identities but had not acted on them.

    • Factors Associated with Sexual Debut in Mexican Adolescents: Results of the National Survey on Drug Use among Students in 2014

      2019, Journal of Sexual Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      1 study that included countries with varying degrees of economic development in Asia, Africa, the Americas, Europe, and Oceania found that sexual debut occurred between the ages of 15–19, sexual activity among young people was sporadic (<50% had had sex in the previous month), monogamy was widespread, and boys were more likely than girls to initiate their sexual lives early and report multiple sexual partners.9 In recent years, the association between sexual debut and substance use has gained prominence,2,15,16,18–20 as has the need to consider sexual preference as a relevant variable.12,21,22 In a long-term study in the United States on middle school students aged 11–14, researchers highlighted the association between substance use and early sexual debut and proposed that this association could be explained by the disinhibiting effects of substance use (tobacco, alcohol, or other drugs) and the context, such as nightlife, which is more appropriate for adults, where substance use is common.15

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts to declare.

    Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health.

    View full text