Adolescent health briefEstimating Population Size and Demographic Characteristics of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth in Middle School
Section snippets
Methods
Using a stratified random sampling design, the 2011 YRBS was administered to 2,730 youth (grades 6–8) across all 22 public middle schools in San Francisco in compliance with the CDC's administration guidelines and state regulations on parent consent/notification. The process yielded a 74% survey completion rate, surpassing the CDC's 60% criteria for the generation of weighted data. CDC statisticians calculated sampling weights, strata, and primary sampling unit statistics. Cross-tabs using
Measures
Following the CDC guidelines, standard YRBS demographic items (e.g., sex, race/ethnicity, age, and grade) were included in the analyses if no fewer than 100 respondents were represented [8]. Sexual orientation was measured using the item, “Which of the following best describes you?” and the response set “heterosexual (straight); gay or lesbian; bisexual; and not sure.” Transgender-inclusive gender was measured with the item, “What is your gender?” and the response set “female; male; and
Results
Population estimates show 3.8% of students in SFUSD middle schools identify as LGB (Table 1). Within the 3.8% of LGB students, 1.7% identify as gay or lesbian and 2.1% as bisexual. Another 12.1% of students responded they were “not sure” about their sexual orientation. Results also show 1.3% of students identify as transgender, resulting in a weighted population estimate of 137 transgender youth. Across available demographic variables, the proportion of LGB and transgender youth appeared to
Discussion and Conclusions
The population estimates derived in this study clearly demonstrate the presence of LGBT students at the middle school level. The large proportion of students (12.1%) who report being “unsure” of their sexual orientation is likely owing to a combination of factors, including the variability of developmental trajectories across youth; their social, cultural, and familial contexts; and differences in youths' understanding and interpretation of the survey item. Additional research is needed on the
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the San Francisco Unified School District's School Health Programs staff; its director Kim Coates; and program managers Kevin Gogin and Kim Levine for their invaluable contributions to and support of this study. Points of view or opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the San Francisco Unified School District.
References (10)
The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people; conducting research on the health status of LGBT populations; Chapter Three: Childhood/Adolescence
(2011)Young adolescents' developmental characteristics
- et al.
Design, development and testing of the NHIS sexual identity question
(2011) - et al.
Making sense of sexual orientation measures: Findings from a cognitive processing study with adolescents on health survey questions
J LGBT Health Res
(2007) - et al.
Understanding sexual minority youth. 2008. University of Florida IFAS Extension
Cited by (93)
Clinical profiles and care of transgender children and adolescents in a specialized consultation in Île-de-France
2023, Neuropsychiatrie de l'Enfance et de l'AdolescenceGender care
2023, Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Health, First EditionThe care of transgender children and adolescents in France: Recent controversies and ethical issues
2022, Neuropsychiatrie de l'Enfance et de l'AdolescenceOverview of residency doctors’ training in Île-de-France on care of children and adolescents with a trans-identity status
2021, Neuropsychiatrie de l'Enfance et de l'AdolescenceMental Healthcare Utilization of Transgender Youth Before and After Affirming Treatment
2021, Journal of Sexual Medicine