Adolescent health briefImpact of Victimization on Risk of Suicide Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual High School Students in San Francisco
Section snippets
Sampling
The current study used data from SFUSD's 2009 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), a population-based survey developed by the CDC (84% response rate, n = 2,154 students in grades 9–12 across 15 SFUSD high schools).
Measures
Three suicide risk-related outcomes from the YRBS were analyzed as dichotomous dependent variables: sadness/depression (i.e., during the past 12 months, did you ever feel so sad or hopeless almost every day for 2 weeks or more in a row that you stopped doing some usual activities?),
Results
LGB youth reported significantly higher rates of substance use, victimization, and suicide risk-related outcomes than H youth (Table 1). Statistically significant ORs ranged from 3.3 to 6.2 across measured indicators.
No significant interaction effect between sexual orientation and victimization was found in the logistic regression models examining sadness/depression or suicide attempt. In both models, sexual orientation and victimization showed statistically significant main effects after
Discussion
No differential effect of victimization was found on the reports of sadness/depression or suicide attempts for LGB versus H youth. Controlling for demographics and substance use, victimization and sexual orientation were found to be significant risk factors for these two suicide risk-related outcomes. By contrast, there was a differential effect of victimization on reported suicide planning, with H youth reporting more severe consequences–a threefold increase in the odds of suicide planning for
Conclusions
Despite the sample size limitations of this study and its focus on relatively low prevalence outcomes, which can undermine statistical power because of low cell counts, the results do underscore the deleterious effect of victimization on suicide-related outcomes among both LGB and H youth in our school-based sample. Our results also confirm that more research is needed on other contextual factors and experiences beyond those measured by our models (e.g., family support, community
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the San Francisco Unified School District under cooperative agreement with the CDC's Division of Adolescent and School Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (5U87DP001177-03).
References (11)
- et al.
Victimization, use of violence and drug use at school among male adolescents who engage in same-sex sexual behavior
J Pediatr
(1998) - et al.
Effects of at school victimization and sexual orientation on lesbian, gay, or bisexual youths' health risk behavior
J Adolesc Health
(2002) - et al.
Association between health risk behaviors, sexual orientation among a school-based sample of adolescents
Pediatrics
(1998) LGBTQ youth are at risk in U.S. school environment
SIECUS Report
(2001)- et al.
Adolescent sexual orientation and suicide risk: Evidence from a national study
Am J Public Health
(2001)
Cited by (70)
Peer experiences of LGBQ youth
2023, Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Health, First EditionThe roles of school in supporting LGBTQ+ youth: A systematic review and ecological framework for understanding risk for suicide-related thoughts and behaviors
2022, Journal of School PsychologyCitation Excerpt :Finally, school context was explored in three studies exclusively exploring school demographics characteristics and school structure was explored in two studies in relation to health and sexual education curricula. Findings exploring queer students broadly (i.e., not disaggregated by specific LGBTQ+ identity within the queer umbrella) overwhelmingly supported a direct relationship between victimization and STB, with effect sizes ranging from small to large (Annor et al., 2018; Ballard et al., 2017; Barnett et al., 2019; Bontempo & D'Augelli, 2002; Bouris et al., 2016; Button, 2015; Button & Worthen, 2014; Duong & Bradshaw, 2014; Eisenberg et al., 2016; Espelage et al., 2018; Friedman et al., 2006; Goldblum et al., 2012; Goodenow et al., 2006; Hatchel, Ingram, et al., 2019; Hatchel, Merrin, & Espelage, 2019; Hatzenbuehler & Keyes, 2013; King et al., 2018; Poteat et al., 2011; Russell et al., 2011; Shields et al., 2012; Taliaferro et al., 2018; Walls et al., 2008). Multiple studies accounting for demographic characteristics and/or other significant predictors of STB (e.g., hopelessness, depressive symptoms, drug and alcohol use) also supported the significant negative effects of victimization on STB, with small to moderate effect sizes (e.g., Button, 2015; Goodenow et al., 2006; Perez-Brumer et al., 2017; Taliaferro & Muehlenkamp, 2017; Walls et al., 2008).
The intersection between youth who identify as LGBTQ+ and emergency care for suicidality: an integrative review
2022, Journal of Pediatric NursingSexual orientation and sleep problem among Chinese college students: Mediating roles of interpersonal problems and depressive symptoms
2021, Journal of Affective Disorders