Research paperREM sleep fragmentation associated with depressive symptoms and genetic risk for depression in a community-based sample of adolescents
Introduction
The duration and quality of Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep has been proposed to be related to affective and cognitive processes (Walker and van der Helm, 2009). REM sleep is associated with procedural and emotional memory consolidation (Groch and Wilhelm, 2013, Ackermann and Rasch, 2014), although the precise function of REM sleep remains partly unresolved (Ackermann and Rasch, 2014, Peever and Fuller, 2017, Tempesta and Socci, 2018). Increasing evidence points to the role of REM sleep in emotion regulation. For example, in depressive individuals, REM sleep in specific may contribute to enhanced consolidation of negative memories (Harrington et al., 2018). REM sleep can also contribute to maintaining optimal emotional homeostasis by decreasing accumulation of negative affectivity (Gujar and McDonald, 2011, van der Helm and Yao, 2011). REM sleep deprivation, in turn, is associated with increased emotional reactivity compared to NREM sleep deprivation (Rosales-Lagarde et al., 2012). At the theoretical level, it has been suggested that REM sleep promotes both reactivation of previously acquired affective experiences in the limbic system and their integration to semantic memory, leading to reduced amygdala activity and affective memory trace over time (Walker and van der Helm, 2009). In support of this, it has been shown how rapid eye movements in REM sleep cause transient, time-locked activation of the amygdala (Corsi-Cabrera et al., 2016), confirming the role of limbic system in reprocessing and consolidation of emotional experiences during REM sleep.
As reviewed by Palagini (Palagini et al., 2013), REM sleep alterations, such as decrease in the interval from sleep onset to the first REM episode (REM latency), increase of total REM sleep duration, and increased REM density (the frequency of rapid eye movements per REM period) have been frequently observed in people diagnosed with major depressive disorder. It has been proposed that these changes might be prodromal and residual properties with respect to depressive episodes. For instance, shortened REM latency can persist beyond the depressive episode and increase the likelihood of relapse (Paykel, 2008). Increased REM density, in turn, has been associated with increased memory consolidation of negatively-valenced emotional content (Gilson et al., 2015). Thus, these alterations may be trait markers of depression vulnerability that are non-specific, as not all depressed individuals display REM alterations (Riemann et al., 2001). In addition, other psychiatric disorders (e.g., PTSD) are associated with different REM dysfunctions (Habukawa et al., 2018). It has also been suggested that there are underlying genetic drivers that may cause both REM sleep changes and vulnerability for depression (Palagini et al., 2013). These may equally relate to the individual vulnerability for stress.
Expanding upon traditional ways of looking at REM alterations, recent studies have examined REM sleep fragmentation (i.e., the number and duration of short arousals that disrupt the continuity of the REM period). People with chronic PTSD have more fragmented sleep, even when compared to individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) (Habukawa et al., 2018), and this was related to the subjective experience of trauma-related nightmare intensity in those with PTSD. Thus, REM sleep continuity may function to de-potentiate emotional load; a function that is disrupted when REM is fragmented by brief arousals. Indeed, in an experimental fMRI study by van der Helm et al. (van der Helm et al., 2011) it was shown that when REM sleep was characterized by lower gamma power at the prefrontal region there was a greater overnight de-potentiation of neural and behavioral responsivity to affective stimuli. Insomnia severity and an experience of distress lasting over the night have also been associated with nocturnal hyperarousal and REM discontinuity (Wassing et al., 2016). It was suggested that hyperarousal and related REM discontinuity plays a significant role in the regulation of emotions in insomnia, depression, and PTSD, by weakening the de-potentiation of negative distress.
The current study explores the question of REM fragmentation, density and latency in relation to depressive symptoms among a community cohort of individuals born in 1998, who underwent a sleep EEG at the age of 17 years. We hypothesized to find associations between higher level of depressive symptoms and lower REM sleep quality. Given many young people experience poor sleep (Bartel and Gradisar, 2015, Crowley and Wolfson, 2018) and subthreshold depression during adolescence (Bertha and Balazs, 2013, Wesselhoeft and Sorensen, 2013) this sample in this developmental period represents a good ‘model’ to test the proposed associations.
Finally, there is evidence for a genetic role linking depression and various aspects of REM sleep (see Palagini et al., 2013, for review). In the present study, we explored a new aspect of REM sleep dysregulation. We also examined whether the effect of depressive symptoms on REM sleep would be enhanced by genetic vulnerability to depression. Towards this aim, we built a polygenic risk score (PRS) derived from a recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) for depressive symptoms (Demirkan et al., 2016). The asset in polygenic scores is that they combine together many genetic variants obtained from large, already existing genome-wide association studies. Polygenic score is thus a weighted genetic index score for a risk concerning a specific trait or disease. In relation to a candidate gene approach, PRS has the advantage of representing hundreds, or even thousands of SNPs related to a complex trait in one score. This is a novel approach in studies on REM sleep, as the previous candidate gene (Chang et al., 2016) or twin studies (Markovic et al., 2018) on REM have not directly addressed the question of REM sleep quality. In sum, our study thus seeks new understanding on the quality of REM sleep in relation to individual resilience and mental health from both genetic and self-experienced perspectives.
Section snippets
Participants
Adolescents were from an urban community-based cohort composed of 1049 healthy singletons (Strandberg et al., 2001). The consecutive sample was born between March and November 1998 in Helsinki, Finland. We invited the participants from the cohort in the order of their 17th birthday, resulting in a very narrow age range (M = 16.9, SD = 0.1; range 16.6 to 17.2 years). We invited adolescents who had participated in the previous follow-up at the age of 12 years (Pesonen and Martikainen, 2014, Kuula
BDI-II factors
We found the best fit for the two-factor solution of BDI-II with a cognitive (C; 5 items) and somatic-affective (SA; 13 items) component, a solution which is a slight modification, but close to the initial factor structure suggested by Beck et al. (Beck et al., 1996) and confirmed in other studies (Skule et al., 2014). These factors explained 8.5 and 43.3% of the variation of the entire BDI-II, respectively, and similar to a recent study (Skule et al., 2014), the factor C had the highest four
Discussion
Adolescence is a vulnerable period for experiencing both poor sleep and low mood (Bertha and Balazs, 2013, Wesselhoeft and Sorensen, 2013, Bartel and Gradisar, 2015, Crowley and Wolfson, 2018). Depression during adolescence results from insufficient sleep quantity and quality (Lovato and Gradisar, 2014). Among sleep quality parameters, an increasing evidence shows that fragmentation of REM sleep affects negatively the regulation of distress (Walker and van der Helm, 2009, Gujar and McDonald,
Conclusions
REM fragmentations are short arousals during REM sleep inducing discontinuity of sleep especially towards the morning hours. The main finding of the current study showed that depressive symptoms and polygenic risk score for somatic complaints are independently associated with more fragmented REM sleep. Although causal explanations cannot be concluded, the possibility exists that fragmented REM sleep is linked with less efficient regulation of negative affect. Based on the present study's
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare
Contributors
Study conception and design: AKP, LK, KR, JL.
Acquisition of data: AKP, LK, KR, JL.
Analysis and interpretation of data: AKP, MG, MS, LK, RT, JL.
Drafting of manuscript: AKP, MG, LK, MS, JL.
Critical revision: AKP, MG, LK, MS, IM, RT KR, JL.
Role of the funding source
The study was supported by the Academy of Finland
Acknowledgment
We are thankful for research nurse Helena Alfthan and Risto Halonen for the sleep measurements
References (41)
- et al.
Polysomnographic features of early-onset depression: a meta-analysis
J Affect Disord
(2014) - et al.
Protective and risk factors for adolescent sleep: a meta-analytic review
Sleep Med Rev
(2015) - et al.
An update on adolescent sleep: New evidence informing the perfect storm model
J Adolesc
(2018) - et al.
The role of REM sleep in the processing of emotional memories: evidence from behavior and event-related potentials
Neurobiol Learn Mem
(2013) - et al.
Differences in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep abnormalities between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder patients: REM interruption correlated with nightmare complaints in PTSD
Sleep Med
(2018) - et al.
The influence of REM sleep and SWS on emotional memory consolidation in participants reporting depressive symptoms
Cortex
(2018) - et al.
REM sleep dysregulation in depression: state of the art
Sleep Med Rev
(2013) - et al.
The biology of REM sleep
Curr Biol
(2017) - et al.
Sleep and depression–results from psychobiological studies: an overview
Biol Psychol
(2001) - et al.
Sleep and emotional processing
Sleep Med Rev
(2018)
REM sleep depotentiates amygdala activity to previous emotional experiences
Curr Biol
Subthreshold depression in children and adolescents - a systematic review
J Affect Disord
EEG arousals: scoring rules and examples: a preliminary report from the Sleep Disorders Atlas Task Force of the American Sleep Disorders Association
Sleep
Differential effects of non-REM and REM sleep on memory consolidation?
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep
BDI-II: Beck Depression Inventory Manual
Subthreshold depression in adolescence: a systematic review
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Circadian gene variants influence sleep and the sleep electroencephalogram in humans
Chronobiol Int
Human amygdala activation during rapid eye movements of rapid eye movement sleep: an intracranial study
J Sleep Res
Somatic, positive and negative domains of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies
Psychol Med
Cross-cultural examination of measurement invariance of the Beck Depression Inventory-II
Psychol Assess
Cited by (40)
Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Engages Melanin-Concentrating Hormone Neurons to Reduce Cocaine Seeking
2022, Biological PsychiatryThe independent effects of sleep deprivation and sleep fragmentation on processing of emotional information
2022, Behavioural Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :In support of this finding, neuroimaging studies have reported significant deficits in inhibition-related neural activation (including the inferior frontal gyrus, supplementary motor area, subthalamic nucleus and insula) and vision-related regions (occipital cortex, lingual gyrus and fusiform gyrus) after total sleep deprivation, which has been shown to play a role in face perception [47]. Sleep fragmentation, specifically REM sleep fragmentation, has been associated with processing of emotional information, including poorer emotional memory processing [25], attenuated emotional processing [44] and impaired affect regulation [28,41]. Participants in the SF group in the current study had a reduction REM sleep time, as well as SWS, which may explain this impairment in emotional processing.
Insomnia disorder and its reciprocal relation with psychopathology
2021, Current Opinion in PsychologyA meta-analysis of the relationship between subjective sleep and depressive symptoms in adolescence
2021, Sleep MedicineCitation Excerpt :Two studies could not be accessed due to being behind a paywall. To limit heterogeneity in methodology we removed two papers that measured sleep objectively (not subjectively) [32,33]. Lastly, one study was removed due to only providing longitudinal data, that is sleep and depressive symptoms were not measured concurrently.