Preliminary communicationProbing for depression and finding diabetes: a mixed-methods analysis of depression interviews with adults treated for type 2 diabetes
Introduction
Individuals with diabetes are more likely to experience depression compared to the general population (Anderson et al., 2001). Depression, in turn, is related to poorer glycemic control (Lustman et al., 2000), increased risk of complications (de Groot et al., 2001); greater mortality risk (e.g. Black et al., 2003, Egede et al., 2005, Katon et al., 2005); and poorer diabetes treatment adherence and self-management (Gonzalez et al., 2008b). These relationships suggest the potential importance of depression screening and assessment in identifying patients at risk for poor treatment outcomes (Holt and Van der Feltz-Cornelis, 2012). However, the methods used to assess depression throughout most of the literature from which the above patterns emerge are limited: they neither adequately capture the construct of major depressive disorder (MDD) nor do they adequately differentiate MDD from subclinical (i.e., not of sufficient severity to warrant a psychiatric diagnosis) levels of emotional distress (Gonzalez et al., 2011). First, the vast majority of studies have relied on self-report screening instruments with high rates of false positives for the identification of MDD cases (Roy et al., 2012). This reliance on self-report likely leads to significant heterogeneity and measurement error in the evaluation of depression in patients with diabetes (e.g. Fisher et al., 2007). Second, the psychiatric construct of MDD is insufficient to account for observed relationships between symptoms of emotional distress and diabetes self-management and treatment outcomes. For example, self-reported emotional distress is consistently associated with glycemic control and diabetes self-management but interview-assessed MDD is not (Fisher et al., 2007, Fisher et al., 2010). Furthermore, depressive symptom severity scores that fall below the cutoff for MDD (i.e., subclinical emotional distress) are nevertheless associated with worse diabetes treatment adherence, poorer self-management (Gonzalez et al., 2007), and higher risk of complications and mortality (Black et al., 2003).
It has been suggested that the emotional distress frequently reported by diabetes patients can often reflect diabetes-related distress, a non-psychiatric construct representing the experience of significant emotional distress secondary to living with the burden of diabetes and its treatment (Fisher et al., 2012). Questionnaires have been developed to evaluate diabetes-related distress (Polonsky et al., 1995, Polonsky et al., 2005) and a considerable literature has developed to document consistent associations between increased diabetes-related distress and poor diabetes self-management and treatment outcomes (e.g. Fisher et al., 2007, Fisher et al., 2008, Fisher et al., 2010). Consistent and sizable positive correlations (r=.48 to .54; Gonzalez et al., 2008a, Fisher et al., 2010) between measures of diabetes distress and symptoms of MDD suggest significant overlap between these constructs.
Considerable evidence supports the role of diabetes as a life stressor that contributes to symptoms of depression. For example, depressive symptoms are more common among diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients versus those with undiagnosed diabetes or impaired fasting blood glucose (Knol et al., 2007); and among treated versus untreated patients (Golden et al., 2008). Furthermore, insulin-treated patients are more likely to report symptoms of MDD than patients on oral medications only (Aikens et al., 2008, Gonzalez et al., 2007). Diabetes-related somatic symptoms (Ludman et al., 2004) and complications (de Groot et al., 2001, Vileikyte et al., 2009) are also associated with increased depressive symptoms, as are comorbid physical illnesses (Egede, 2005).
Attention to contextual factors surrounding depressive symptoms – whether they meet the MDD criteria or not – could provide valuable information to guide effective, tailored treatment planning (Gonzalez et al., 2011). However, current guidelines in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) specify that bereavement is the only life event or stressor clinicians should take into account when making diagnostic evaluations for MDD. In the upcoming fifth edition of the manual, it has been proposed to remove the bereavement exclusion and add a footnote for clinicians regarding how to differentiate bereavement and other “loss reactions” from a Major Depressive Episode (American Psychiatric Association, n.d.). This change may be more in line with the way experienced clinicians consider other life events beyond bereavement as exemptions to the diagnosis. A recent study demonstrated that clinical psychologists commonly take life context into account when diagnosing MDD and other disorders and rate symptoms as less abnormal if they occur in the context of a significant life stressor (Kim et al., 2012). Furthermore, causal attributions for depressive symptoms appear to influence the likelihood of being diagnosed with depression and receiving treatment in primary care practice (van den Boogaard et al., 2011). Thus, contextual explanations and causal models for depression appear to be implicated in evaluation of depressive symptoms, despite being largely ignored by current diagnostic guidelines for MDD.
The effect of patients’ experiences with diabetes and its management on depression assessment remains in need of further investigation and could have implications for the conceptualization and measurement of depression in adults treated for type 2 diabetes. More important, the diabetes-related context that some patients provide to explain their depressive symptoms may offer important clues regarding causal mechanisms and could guide the selection of appropriate interventions. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to use a mixed-methods (qualitative and quantitative) approach to identify and describe the diabetes-related context that type 2 diabetes patients spontaneously use to explain their experience of symptoms assessed by semi-structured depression interviews. The study had three aims. First, we used content analysis to categorize responses mentioning experience with diabetes and its treatment as a context for depressive symptoms being evaluated. We rated each interview for frequency of participants endorsing diabetes as an explanatory context for depressive symptoms. Next, we examined quantitative relationships between the tendency to use diabetes as an explanatory context during the depression interview and self-reported diabetes-related distress. Finally, we examined differences by treatment regimen and lifetime MDD diagnosis in diabetes-related distress and use of diabetes as an explanatory context for depressive symptoms.
Section snippets
Methods
We recruited adults (over 18 years) with type 2 diabetes through recruitment mailings, direct referrals, clinic screenings and flyers in affiliated primary care clinics and the Montefiore Clinical Diabetes Program in the Bronx, NY. Eligible participants were those who could read and write in English and who were being treated with medication for type 2 diabetes. This report presents data on a subset of the first 70 participants who completed the study including informed consent and all relevant
Participant characteristics
Seventy adults (M age 55.64; 67.1% female; 64.3% black; 21.4% Hispanic) participated in the study (Table 1). More than half the sample had no history of MDD (61.4%); 38.6% met criteria for either current, past or recurrent MDD. Sixty-two participants scored at least one point on the MADRS, 34 (48.6%) of whom mentioned diabetes to explain symptoms at least once in the interview. When questioned directly, 61.4% of participants (n=43) said that diabetes contributed to their depressive symptoms.
Discussion
The current study provides evidence that, for an ethnically diverse sample of adults with treated type 2 diabetes, structured depression interviews elicited symptoms of depression that were often characterized by patients as ocurring within the context of coping with diabetes and its treatment. Although probes for depressive symptoms did not directly assess the role of diabetes, many participants spontaneously described the influence of diabetes on the symptoms being evaluated. Major
Conclusions
A majority of participants in this study believed that their diabetes contributed to their symptoms of depression; this information is lost in measures that rely on symptom counts to assess depression symptom severity. Therefore, this study points to the need for further research on assessment and treatment methods that incorporate the context of chronic illnesses, as part of the process. Tailored treatments that acknowledge and address patients’ explanatory contexts for depressive symptoms
Role of funding source
This study was partially supported by Grant DK-020541 from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK).
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Acknowledgments
We thank Sabrina A. Esbitt for her data collection efforts and input on the study design.
References (51)
- et al.
Co-occurrence of diabetes and depression: conceptual considerations for an emerging global health challenge
Journal of Affective Disorders
(2012) - et al.
The role of affective temperaments in metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes
Journal of Affective Disorders
(2011) - et al.
Depressive temperament, distress, psychological adjustment and depressive symptoms in type 2 diabetes
Journal of Affective Disorders
(2012) - et al.
The relationship between temperament, diabetes and depression
Journal of Affective Disorders
(2012) - et al.
Key concepts in screening for depression in people with diabetes
Journal of Affective Disorders
(2012) - et al.
Depression and diabetes symptom burden
General Hospital Psychiatry
(2004) - et al.
Negotiating “depression” in primary care: a qualitative study
Social Science and Medicine
(2009) - et al.
Can general practitioners identify people with distress and mild depression? A meta-analysis of clinical accuracy
Journal of Affective Disorders
(2011) - et al.
A comparison between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the self-rating version of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
Journal of Affective Disorders
(2001) - et al.
The impact of causal attributions on diagnosis and successful referral of depressed patients in primary care
Social Science and Medicine
(2011)
Association between depression and concurrent type 2 diabetes outcomes varies by diabetes regimen
Diabetic Medicine
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes
Diabetes Care
A qualitative study of perceived responsibility and self-blame in type 2 diabetes: reflections of physicians and patients
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Understanding physicians' challenges when treating type 2 diabetic patients’ social and emotional difficulties: a qualitative study
Diabetes Care
Depression predicts increased incidence of adverse health outcomes in older Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes
Diabetes Care
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Association of depression and diabetes complications: a meta-analysis
Psychosomatic Medicine
Effect of comorbid chronic diseases on prevalence and odds of depression in adults with diabetes
Psychosomatic Medicine
Depression and all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality among adults with and without diabetes
Diabetes Care
A longitudinal study of affective and anxiety disorders, depressive affect and diabetes distress in adults with type 2 diabetes
Diabetic Medicine
Clinical depression versus distress among patients with type 2 diabetes: not just a question of semantics
Diabetes Care
When is diabetes distress clinically meaningful? Establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale
Diabetes Care
Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses
Diabetes Care
Cited by (13)
Causal and bidirectional linkages over time between depression and diabetes regimen distress in adults with type 2 diabetes
2015, Diabetes Research and Clinical PracticeCitation Excerpt :Second, patients with diabetes and a PHQ-8 score of ≥15 were excluded, so the consistency of the bidirectional findings at the upper range of depression symptoms was not studied. However, data suggest that diabetes patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) are as equally likely to endorse diabetes as a source for their depression symptoms as those who do not meet diagnostic criteria for MDD [31]. Third, the subgroup analyses forced a partition of the sample and, therefore, reduced statistical power.
Diabetes distress in Veterans with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Qualitative descriptive study
2024, Journal of Health PsychologyDiabetes stress and health: Is aging a strength or a vulnerability?
2020, Journal of Behavioral MedicineDepression and anxiety in adults with diabetes
2020, Behavioral Diabetes: Social Ecological Perspectives for Pediatric and Adult PopulationsDiabetes distress and quality of life in adults with diabetes
2020, Behavioral Diabetes: Social Ecological Perspectives for Pediatric and Adult PopulationsAddressing diabetes distress in clinical care: a practical guide
2019, Diabetic Medicine