Research report
Impact of anxiety disorders on attentional functions in children with ADHD

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

The impact of internalizing comorbid disorders on cognitive functions in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is hardly understood. While inconsistent findings exist with respect to the modulating effect of anxiety on impulsivity in ADHD, only few neuropsychological studies focused on other attention parameters. This is the first study that examines the influence of anxiety disorders (ANX) on ADHD in a model-oriented approach including selectivity and intensity parameters of attention.

Methods

Children with ADHD, ADHD + ANX and healthy controls (n = 34 for each group, all aged 8–15 years) participated in five neuropsychological tasks (alertness, sustained attention, divided attention, go/no-go and set-shifting). Group differences were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for each dependent variable, with group as independent variable.

Results

Data indicated that children with ADHD performed worse than healthy controls with regard to almost all parameters of attention. While ANX had no mitigating effect on impulsivity in ADHD, performance in sustained attention and selective attention tasks of children with ADHD + ANX was better than that of children with ADHD only.

Limitations

Since the present data were derived from a large neuropsychological data base which focused primary on children with ADHD and different comorbidities no comparison to a “pure” ANX group was possible.

Conclusions

These findings might indicate that ADHD + ANX constitute a cognitively distinct subtype, with possible individual symptomatology, development and therapeutic needs. Further investigations are needed to clarify the specificity of these findings and to disentangle the impact of trait versus state anxiety on neuropsychological performance in children with ADHD.

Introduction

ADHD is a heterogeneous neuropsychiatric disorder affecting between 4 and 10% of the childhood population (Skounti et al., 2007). It is characterized by developmentally inappropriate levels of activity and impulsivity as well as inattentive behaviour. Numerous studies have investigated individuals with ADHD without comorbid disorders in comparison to healthy controls using various neuropsychological measurements. Nevertheless, ADHD very often co-occurs with other psychiatric disorders (Elia et al., 2008), which may influence the performance on different neuropsychological tests (for reviews see Willcutt et al., 2005, Seidman, 2006). For example, it has been well established that children with ADHD who also suffer from externalizing disorders show poorer neuropsychological performance (e. g. response inhibition), as compared to children with ADHD alone (for a meta-analysis see Lijffijt et al., 2005). There is even an intensive discussion regarding the comorbidity of ADHD and disruptive behavior disorders (DBD) as two distinct disorders or a “true hybrid” (e. g. DSM-IV versus ICD-10). However, less is known about the impact of internalizing comorbid disorders on cognitive functions in ADHD.

Approximately 25% to 50% of all children with ADHD exhibit an anxiety disorder (ANX) and the combination of both seems to have a significant impact on neuropsychological test performance (for a review see Schatz and Rostain, 2006). In line with the evidence on the relationship between ADHD and externalizing disorder, data from the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD (MTA) indicate that the co-occurrence of ADHD + ANX seems to be a distinct clinical subtype with its own implications for aetiology, assessment, and treatment (for reviews see Hinshaw, 2007, Jarrett and Ollendick, 2008).

Current models of ADHD suggest that it is best characterized as a disorder of impaired executive functions or reduced inhibition control (for a review see Nigg, 2001; for a meta-analysis see Willcutt et al., 2005). By contrast, it has been suggested that ANX are associated with increased control of inhibition (Oosterlaan and Sergeant, 1998, Degnan and Fox, 2007). In addition, a strong tendency for response inhibition in children seems to be a powerful predictor of later ANX (for a review see Biederman et al., 1995). Finally, it has been suggested that ANX might act as a protective factor against the development of ADHD (Nigg, 2006). Thus, most of the existing studies examined the impact of ANX on inhibitory control and impulsivity in children with ADHD.

Previous neuropsychological studies have provided conflicting results whether children with ADHD + ANX showed better inhibitory control when compared to children with pure ADHD (Pliszka, 1992, Manassis et al., 2000) or not (Newcorn et al., 2001). Based on the review of Schatz and Rostain (2006) most studies did not find a robust effect of ANX on ADHD and the authors concluded that ANX may partially inhibit the impulsivity seen in ADHD. However, a more recent neuropsychological investigation has shown that children with ADHD + ANX did not differ from those with pure ADHD with respect to response inhibition (Korenblum et al., 2007).

To date, only a few studies have investigated the impact of ANX on other cognitive domains in ADHD. Tannock et al. (1995) found a poorer working memory performance of children with ADHD + ANX compared to those with pure ADHD. By contrast, more recently, Manassis (2007) could not replicate these finding. Nevertheless, since the MTA revealed that children with ADHD + ANX are characterized by an increased treatment response and a better prognosis than those with pure ADHD (Jensen et al., 2001) one could speculate, that children with ADHD + ANX might exhibit a less impaired cognitive performance than those with ADHD alone. However, to our knowledge, no study has examined the influence of ANX in ADHD on attention in a model-oriented approach including a comprehensive assessment of different attentional functions.

Taken together, the available data suggest that the comorbidity of ANX is a possible modulator of the cognitive performance in children with ADHD. There is, however, still a lack of comprehensive neuropsychological data to characterize the attentional performance of children with ADHD + ANX compared to those with pure ADHD and healthy controls. Therefore we examined whether different intensity and selectivity parameters of attention as well as the supervisory attentional control mechanism vary due to comorbid ANX in children with ADHD. Data were assessed using different computerized attention tests according to a model-oriented approach (Van Zomeren and Brouwer, 1994; see also Fig. 1).

Based on the existing literature, we hypothesized that children with ADHD and ADHD + ANX would not differ in respect to measures of response inhibition (Korenblum et al., 2007), but would perform worse than healthy controls. Furthermore, with regard to intensity aspects of attention, we hypothesized that children with ADHD + ANX would present a less impaired or at least comparable performance vs. children with pure ADHD (Jensen et al., 2001, for review see Hinshaw, 2007).

Section snippets

Participants and selection procedure

A total of 102 children aged 8 to 15 years participated in the study. 34 fulfilled diagnostic criteria for ADHD and at least one anxiety disorder, 34 for ADHD alone (according to DSM-IV; APA, 1994). 34 children constituted a healthy control group. All patients had been consecutively admitted to the inpatient and outpatient clinics of the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at the University Hospital Aachen with suspected ADHD and ANX symptomatology, respectively. The children in the

Results

The first hypothesis was that children with ADHD and ADHD + ANX would not differ in respect to measures of impulsivity but would perform worse than the healthy controls.

In the go/no-go task (selectivity dimension of attention) we detected an effect on false alarms (F(2;99) = 8.3; p < 0.001; pη2 = 0.147). While children with ADHD + ANX and children with ADHD alone performed more poorly on this task compared to the healthy control group, the performance of these two clinical groups did not differ

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of comorbid ANX on neuropsychological test performance in children with ADHD. Hence, we compared the performance of 8 to 15 year old children with ADHD, ADHD and at least one anxiety disorder and healthy control children on five different neuropsychological tasks. As expected, although the performance of the three groups on the alertness task was not significantly different, children with ADHD performed worse than healthy controls on all

Conclusion

Despite the fact that ANX often co-occurs with ADHD there is a lack of consistent data about the influence of comorbid ANX on attentional performance in children with ADHD. In the present investigation assessment of measurements of intensity of attention, selectivity of attention, and supervisory attentional control revealed that ANX seems to some extent modulate the attentional performance in affected children. In detail, children with ADHD + ANX performed worse than normal controls, but their

Keypoints

Though ADHD frequently co-occurs with internalizing disorders, most neuropsychological studies so far have investigated individuals with ADHD alone or with comorbid externalizing disorders. However, ADHD also often co-occurs with ANX and especially these children are characterized by a better prognosis than those with ADHD alone. Hence, the current study analyzed the impact of comorbid ANX on neuropsychological test performance in children with ADHD. We found that children with ADHD + ANX had to

Conflict of interest

Nothing declared.

Role of funding source

Funding sources had no involvement in the present study.

Acknowledgments

We thank Stephané DeBrito for his assistance and support as well as all participants and their parents.

References (48)

  • R.M. Roth et al.

    Executive dysfunction in ADHD: cognitive and neuroimaging findings

    Psychiatr. Clin. North Am.

    (2004)
  • L.J. Seidman

    Neuropsychological functioning in people with ADHD across the lifespan

    Clin. Psychol. Rev.

    (2006)
  • J.M. Spikman et al.

    Construct validity of concepts of attention in healthy controls and patients with CHI

    Brain Cogn.

    (2001)
  • R. Tannock et al.

    Differential effects of methylphenidate on working memory in ADHD children with and without comorbid anxiety

    J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psych.

    (1995)
  • E.G. Willcutt et al.

    Validity of the executive function theory of ADHD: a meta-analytic review

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • T.M. Achenbach

    German version of the Child Behavior Checklist

    (1991)
  • American-Psychiatric-Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – DSM-IV

    (1994)
  • A. Angold et al.

    Comorbidity

    J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • J. Biederman et al.

    Behavioral inhibition as a risk factor for anxiety disorders

  • R. Cabeza et al.

    Imaging cognition II: an empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies

    J. Cogn. Neurosc.

    (2000)
  • S.L. Calhoun et al.

    Processing speed in children with clinical disorders

    Psychology in the Schools

    (2005)
  • C.L. Carlson et al.

    Sluggish cognitive tempo predicts a different pattern of impairment in the attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, predominantly inattentive type

    J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol.

    (2000)
  • A. D'Angiulli et al.

    Children's event-related potentials of auditory selective attention vary with their socioeconomic status

    Neuropsychology

    (2008)
  • K.A. Degnan et al.

    Behavioral inhibition and anxiety disorders: multiple levels of a resilience process

    Dev. Psychopathol.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Response inhibition and anxiety in adolescents: Results from a population-based community sample.

      2019, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      These studies where participants are sampled from distinct populations (i.e., two-gate design) are more likely to overestimate the relationship between response inhibition and anxiety than the studies where participants are sampled from identical populations (i.e., single-gate design; Rutjes et al., 2005). Finally, the sample sizes in all of the previous studies investigating the relationship between response inhibition and adolescent anxiety were less than 150, which leads to uncertainty in estimates (Daugherty et al., 1993; Kooijmans et al., 2000; Ladouceur et al., 2006; Oosterlaan and Sergeant, 1996; Ruf et al., 2017; Vloet et al., 2010). To overcome these limitations, the present study aimed to investigate whether response inhibition is related to adolescent anxiety using data from a large-scale population-based cross-sectional sample with the single-gate design.

    • Attentional functions and trait anxiety in children with ADHD

      2014, Learning and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thirdly, out results suggest that children with ADHD have more attention problems than the pure anxiety group. This idea contrasts with the results obtained in previous investigations (Epstein et al., 1997; March et al., 2000; Pacheco-Unguetti et al., 2011; Vloet et al., 2010). Children with anxiety obtained better results than the ADHD group for all measures of response time, the ADHD index and commissions.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text