Special article
Alopecia areata investigational assessment guidelines–Part II

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2003.09.032Get rights and content

Section snippets

Discussion

The literature is replete with small studies on alopecia areata that are not able to be directly compared due to either endpoints that are non-quantitative, poorly defined or which were unnecessarily linked to the sites of hair loss and the sites of regrowth.2., 3., 4., 5., 6., 7., 8., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13., 14. For example, the term “cosmetically acceptable” has been a commonly utilized term that unduly weighs improvement in the top relative to the sides of the scalp since growth here can

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

Funding sources: None.

Conflicts of interest: None identified.

View full text