New research
Quality of Care for Childhood Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in a Managed Care Medicaid Program

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.08.012Get rights and content

Objective

To examine whether clinical severity is greater among children receiving attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) care in primary care compared with those in specialty mental health clinics, and to examine how care processes and clinical outcomes vary by sector across three 6-month time intervals.

Method

This was a longitudinal cohort study of 530 children aged 5 to 11 years receiving ADHD care in primary care or specialty mental health clinics from November 2004 through September 2006 in a large, countywide managed care Medicaid program.

Results

Clinical severity at study entry did not differ between children who received ADHD care in solely primary or specialty mental health care clinics. At three 6-month intervals, receipt of no care ranged from 34% to 44%, and unmet need for mental health services ranged from 13% to 20%. In primary care, 80% to 85% of children had at least one stimulant prescription filled and averaged one to two follow-up visits per year. Less than one-third of children in specialty mental health clinics received any stimulant medication, but all received psychosocial interventions averaging more than five visits per month. In both sectors, stimulant medication refill prescription persistence was poor (31%–49%). With few exceptions, ADHD diagnosis, impairment, academic achievement, parent distress, and parent-reported treatment satisfaction, perceived benefit, and improved family functioning did not differ between children who remained in care and those who received no care.

Conclusion

Areas for quality improvement are alignment of clinical severity with provider type, follow-up visits, stimulant use in specialty mental health, agency data infrastructure to document delivery of evidence-based psychosocial treatment, and stimulant medication refill prescription persistence.

Section snippets

Study Population

The study population comprised children aged 5 to 11 years who were identified by the agency as receiving any ADHD care in a large managed care Medicaid program in primary or specialty mental health care outpatient settings between January 1, 2003, and June 30, 2004. The health plan serves nearly 750,000 County of Los Angeles residents of all ages enrolled in managed care Medicaid, and specialty mental health services are carved-out to the County of Los Angeles Department of Mental Health (DMH).

Sociodemographic Characteristics

The average child age was 9.9 years (SD, 1.9), 68% were male (n = 370), and most (n = 474, 87%) were from minority racial or ethnic backgrounds. Nearly one quarter (n = 125, 23%) were African-American, 54% (n = 293) were Latino, 13% (n = 72) were Caucasian, and 10% (n = 56) were reported by their parents as being from two or more ethnic backgrounds or from other ethnic groups. Of the Latino children, 75% (208/277, 16 missing data) were in the family's first U.S. born generation. Of the parents,

Discussion

Care for childhood ADHD in the managed care Medicaid program studied failed to meet the Institute of Medicine's definition of quality that requires “consistency with current professional knowledge” and “improved likelihood of desired health outcomes.”2 More than one-third of children were receiving no care when interviewed at baseline, a rate double the national rate for adults.38 Despite similar clinical severity, treatment approaches for children were strikingly different in primary care and

References (52)

  • New Freedom Commission on Mental Health: Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in AmericaFinal Report

    (2003)
  • Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General

    (1999)
  • PL 111-113 Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization...
  • PL 111-148 [HR 3590] Patient Protection and Affordable Care...
  • Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA)

  • Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • L.S. Goldman et al.

    Diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents

    JAMA

    (1998)
  • M.L. Wolraich et al.

    Comparison of diagnostic criteria for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in a county-wide sample

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • A. Soni

    The Five Most Costly Children's Conditions 2006: Estimates for the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Children Ages 0-17

    (2009)
  • J. Guevara et al.

    Psychotropic medication use in a population of children who have attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Pediatrics

    (2002)
  • A. Winterstein et al.

    Utilization of pharmacologic treatment in youths with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Medicaid database

    Ann Pharmacother

    (2008)
  • M. Olfson et al.

    National trends in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • R. Mangione-Smith et al.

    The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States

    N Engl J Med

    (2007)
  • E.A. McGlynn et al.

    The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States

    N Engl J Med

    (2003)
  • J.M. Foy

    Introduction: Enhancing Pediatric Mental Health Care

    Pediatrics

    (2010)
  • J.D. Brown et al.

    Identification of youth psychosocial problems during pediatric primary care visits

    Adm Policy Ment Health

    (2007)
  • Cited by (67)

    • Measurement-based Data to Monitor Quality: Why Specification at the Population Level Matter?

      2020, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, for the follow-up care for ADHD measure, the age range is restricted to children ages 6 to 12, limiting the capacity to comment on quality of care for youth or adults with ADHD. Although stimulant medication prescription persistence is poor in managed care Medicaid programs,18 this measure does not directly report the substantial proportion of children who do not receive ongoing stimulant medication treatment. Concerns about adequate medication safety monitoring have also been raised, given that a minimum of 1 follow-up visit and a telephone contact with a prescriber during a 9-month period is sufficient to pass, and this level of contact is inconsistent with federal rules for prescription of Schedule II drugs.68,69

    • Health Care Utilization and Spending for Children With Mental Health Conditions in Medicaid

      2020, Academic Pediatrics
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, youth enrolled in behavioral health utilization management programs are authorized to receive fewer services than recommended by evidence-based guidelines.27 Studies of children with ADHD using Medicaid have shown that the proportion receiving no treatment at all ranges from 10% to 44%, medication adherence was low, and a larger than recommended proportion received medication only without concomitant recommended psychotherapy, and 10% of children with ADHD receive no treatment.28,29 This prior research raises the question whether Medicaid expenditures for MH services are adequate to support recommended MH treatments.

    • The Need for Practice Transformation in Children's Mental Health Care

      2017, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    • The future pediatric subspecialty physician workforce: Meeting the needs of infants, children, and adolescents

      2024, The Future Pediatric Subspecialty Physician Workforce: Meeting the Needs of Infants, Children, and Adolescents
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (RO1 MH061540, P30 MH068639, and P30 MH082760).

    Disclosure: Dr. Bussing is a consultant to or receiving honoraria from Eli Lilly and Co., and Shire, and receives research support from Forest, Pfizer Inc, and Shire. Drs. Zima, Tang, Ettner, Belin, Wells, and Ms. Zhang report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

    This article is discussed in an editorial by Dr. Mark Olfson on page 1183.

    Supplemental material cited in this article is available online.

    View full text