Elsevier

Intelligence

Volume 49, March–April 2015, Pages 110-128
Intelligence

Consistency of attentional control as an important cognitive trait: A latent variable analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.01.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Intra-individual variability (IIV) in attention control was examined.

  • IIV in attention control is related to a number of cognitive abilities.

  • IIV in attention control predicted real world cognitive failures.

  • IIV in attention control was linked to subjective reports of mind-wandering.

Abstract

The present study examined the extent to which consistency in attention control is an important individual difference characteristic related to other cognitive abilities. Experiment 1 demonstrated that intra-individual variability (IIV) on attention control tasks and lexical decision tasks were separate factors with IIV in the attention control factor relating to working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, and long-term memory. Experiment 2 replicated these results and further demonstrated that IIV in attention control predicted everyday cognitive failures (in particular everyday attentional failures). Experiment 3 demonstrated that IIV in attention control was related to subjective reports of mind-wandering but not external distraction, suggesting that fluctuations in attention control are linked to an individual's propensity to mind-wander. Finally, Experiment 3 demonstrated that individual differences in attention control and IIV in attention control are largely the same. These results suggest that the ability to consistently allocate attention control is an important cognitive trait.

Section snippets

Experiment 1

In order to examine the nature of IIV and its relation to a number of cognitive abilities, data from Unsworth and Spillers (2010) were reanalyzed. Specifically, Experiment 1 examined whether IIV in attention control tasks and non-attention demanding RT tasks (here lexical decision tasks thought to primarily rely on lexical and semantic processing) reflects the same or different constructs and whether IIV is related to broader cognitive abilities such as working memory capacity (WMC), fluid

Experiment 2

Experiment 1 demonstrated that IIV in attention control and lexical decision tasks are not necessarily the same with IIV in attention control being related to a number of cognitive abilities and IIV in lexical decision not being related to those same abilities. The purpose of Experiment 2 was to replicate and extend these effects. Specifically, Experiment 2 examined whether IIV in attention control and lexical decision tasks would be best conceptualized as two factors and whether IIV in

Experiment 3

The purpose of Experiment 3 was to better examine individual differences in IIV in attention control. In particular, as noted previously, if IIV represents fluctuations or lapses in attention then it is important to understand what underlies these fluctuations. It is possible that fluctuations in attention are partially due to individuals experiencing mind-wandering or being distracted by external information present during the experiment. Indeed, some prior research has suggested a link

General discussion

In the current study data from three prior latent variable studies were reanalyzed to better examine the notion that consistency in attention control is an important cognitive trait. Experiment 1 demonstrated that IIV on attention control tasks and IIV on lexical decision tasks were best accounted for as separate factors with the IIV attention control factor being related to cognitive abilities including working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, and long-term memory. Experiment 2 replicated

References (51)

  • N. Unsworth et al.

    Similarities and differences between mind-wandering and external distraction: A latent variable analysis of lapses of attention and their relation to cognitive abilities

    Acta Psychologica

    (2014)
  • N. Unsworth et al.

    Lapses in sustained attention and their relation to executive and fluid abilities: An individual differences investigation

    Intelligence

    (2010)
  • N. Unsworth et al.

    Working memory capacity: Attention, memory, or both? A direct test of the dual-component model

    Journal of Memory and Language

    (2010)
  • R. West et al.

    Lapses of intention and performance variability reveal age-related increases in fluctuations of executive control

    Brain and Cognition

    (2002)
  • G. Aston-Jones et al.

    An integrative theory of locus coeruleus–norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance

    Annual Review of Neuroscience

    (2005)
  • M. Bastian et al.

    Mind wandering at the fingertips: Automatic parsing of subjective states based on response variability

    Frontiers in Psychology

    (2013)
  • F.R. Berger et al.

    Air Force Officer Qualifying Test (AFOQT) form P: Test manual (AFHRL-TR-89-56)

    (1990)
  • J.A. Cheyne et al.

    Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors

    Cognition

    (2009)
  • G. Der et al.

    Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: Results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey

    Psychology & Aging

    (2006)
  • D.F. Dinges et al.

    Microcomputer analyses of performance on a portable, simple visual RT task during sustained operations

    Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers

    (1985)
  • J.M. Duchek et al.

    The utility of intraindividual variability in selective attention tasks as an early marker for Alzheimer's disease

    Neuropsychology

    (2009)
  • D. Dykiert et al.

    Age differences in intra-individual variability in simple and choice reaction time: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    PLoS One

    (2012)
  • R.B. Ekstrom et al.

    Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests

    (1976)
  • R.W. Engle et al.

    Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control

  • D.W. Fiske et al.

    Intra-individual response variability

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1955)
  • Cited by (61)

    • Intraindividual reaction time variability and academic achievement of primary school students: A longitudinal cross-lagged panel model

      2022, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      IIRTV refers to a short-term trial-to-trial intraindividual variation in reaction time (RT) that occurs when performing a cognitive task (West, Murphy, Armilio, Craik, & Stuss, 2002). IIRTV is considered an index of attentional control that can capture fluctuations in attentional resources or attentional lapses within consecutive, short time intervals (Isbell et al., 2018; Peng, Zhang, & Wang, 2021; Unsworth, 2015). When children have better attentional control, their responses to task-related goals are more consistent, which manifests as lower IIRTV.

    • Intraindividual reaction time variability as an index of attentional control acts as a moderator of the longitudinal relationships between marital quality and children's externalizing problems

      2021, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Better attentional control contributes to children’s adaptation development, whereas poor attentional control (i.e., inadequate control or regulation of attention) has been found to be associated with children’s more externalizing problems (Barkley, 1997; Belsky et al., 2007; Kim & Deater-Deckard, 2011; Rothbart & Posner, 2015). IIRTV was defined as short-term trial-to-trial intraindividual variation in reaction time (RT) when performing a cognitive task (Isbell, Calkins, Swingler, & Leerkes, 2018; Unsworth, 2015; West, Murphy, Armilio, Craik, & Stuss, 2002; Williams, Thayer, & Koenig, 2016). IIRTV has been thought to index attentional control fluctuations, which is the characteristic feature of attentional control and reflective of the process of attentional control switching between a stable state of being in the zone (being on-task) and an erratic state of being out of the zone (disengaging from the task) (Esterman, Noonan, Rosenberg, & Degutis, 2013; Isbell et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text