Consistency of attentional control as an important cognitive trait: A latent variable analysis
Section snippets
Experiment 1
In order to examine the nature of IIV and its relation to a number of cognitive abilities, data from Unsworth and Spillers (2010) were reanalyzed. Specifically, Experiment 1 examined whether IIV in attention control tasks and non-attention demanding RT tasks (here lexical decision tasks thought to primarily rely on lexical and semantic processing) reflects the same or different constructs and whether IIV is related to broader cognitive abilities such as working memory capacity (WMC), fluid
Experiment 2
Experiment 1 demonstrated that IIV in attention control and lexical decision tasks are not necessarily the same with IIV in attention control being related to a number of cognitive abilities and IIV in lexical decision not being related to those same abilities. The purpose of Experiment 2 was to replicate and extend these effects. Specifically, Experiment 2 examined whether IIV in attention control and lexical decision tasks would be best conceptualized as two factors and whether IIV in
Experiment 3
The purpose of Experiment 3 was to better examine individual differences in IIV in attention control. In particular, as noted previously, if IIV represents fluctuations or lapses in attention then it is important to understand what underlies these fluctuations. It is possible that fluctuations in attention are partially due to individuals experiencing mind-wandering or being distracted by external information present during the experiment. Indeed, some prior research has suggested a link
General discussion
In the current study data from three prior latent variable studies were reanalyzed to better examine the notion that consistency in attention control is an important cognitive trait. Experiment 1 demonstrated that IIV on attention control tasks and IIV on lexical decision tasks were best accounted for as separate factors with the IIV attention control factor being related to cognitive abilities including working memory capacity, fluid intelligence, and long-term memory. Experiment 2 replicated
References (51)
A review of the worst performance rule: Evidence, theory, and alternative hypotheses
Intelligence
(2003)- et al.
Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: Dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations
Acta Psychologica
(1999) - et al.
White matter integrity and reaction time intraindividual variability in healthy aging and early-stage Alzheimer disease
Neuropsychologia
(2012) - et al.
Competition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability
NeuroImage
(2008) - et al.
Reaction time variability and intelligence: A “worst performance” analysis of individual differences
Intelligence
(1990) - et al.
Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: A response time distributional approach
Acta Psychologica
(2000) - et al.
Aging cognition: From neuromodulation to representation
Trends in Cognitive Science
(2001) - et al.
Intraindividual variability in behavior: Links to brain structure, neurotransmission, and neuronal activity
Trends in Neurosciences
(2006) - et al.
Mind-wandering: Phenomenology and function as assessed with a novel experience sampling method
Acta Psychologica
(2011) - et al.
Variation in cognitive failures: An individual differences investigation of everyday attention and memory failures
Journal of Memory & Language
(2012)
Similarities and differences between mind-wandering and external distraction: A latent variable analysis of lapses of attention and their relation to cognitive abilities
Acta Psychologica
Lapses in sustained attention and their relation to executive and fluid abilities: An individual differences investigation
Intelligence
Working memory capacity: Attention, memory, or both? A direct test of the dual-component model
Journal of Memory and Language
Lapses of intention and performance variability reveal age-related increases in fluctuations of executive control
Brain and Cognition
An integrative theory of locus coeruleus–norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Mind wandering at the fingertips: Automatic parsing of subjective states based on response variability
Frontiers in Psychology
Air Force Officer Qualifying Test (AFOQT) form P: Test manual (AFHRL-TR-89-56)
Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors
Cognition
Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: Results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey
Psychology & Aging
Microcomputer analyses of performance on a portable, simple visual RT task during sustained operations
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
The utility of intraindividual variability in selective attention tasks as an early marker for Alzheimer's disease
Neuropsychology
Age differences in intra-individual variability in simple and choice reaction time: Systematic review and meta-analysis
PLoS One
Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests
Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control
Intra-individual response variability
Psychological Bulletin
Cited by (61)
Intraindividual reaction time variability and academic achievement of primary school students: A longitudinal cross-lagged panel model
2022, Journal of Applied Developmental PsychologyCitation Excerpt :IIRTV refers to a short-term trial-to-trial intraindividual variation in reaction time (RT) that occurs when performing a cognitive task (West, Murphy, Armilio, Craik, & Stuss, 2002). IIRTV is considered an index of attentional control that can capture fluctuations in attentional resources or attentional lapses within consecutive, short time intervals (Isbell et al., 2018; Peng, Zhang, & Wang, 2021; Unsworth, 2015). When children have better attentional control, their responses to task-related goals are more consistent, which manifests as lower IIRTV.
Intraindividual reaction time variability as an index of attentional control acts as a moderator of the longitudinal relationships between marital quality and children's externalizing problems
2021, Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyCitation Excerpt :Better attentional control contributes to children’s adaptation development, whereas poor attentional control (i.e., inadequate control or regulation of attention) has been found to be associated with children’s more externalizing problems (Barkley, 1997; Belsky et al., 2007; Kim & Deater-Deckard, 2011; Rothbart & Posner, 2015). IIRTV was defined as short-term trial-to-trial intraindividual variation in reaction time (RT) when performing a cognitive task (Isbell, Calkins, Swingler, & Leerkes, 2018; Unsworth, 2015; West, Murphy, Armilio, Craik, & Stuss, 2002; Williams, Thayer, & Koenig, 2016). IIRTV has been thought to index attentional control fluctuations, which is the characteristic feature of attentional control and reflective of the process of attentional control switching between a stable state of being in the zone (being on-task) and an erratic state of being out of the zone (disengaging from the task) (Esterman, Noonan, Rosenberg, & Degutis, 2013; Isbell et al., 2018).
Naturalistic assessment of reaction time variability in older adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease
2024, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society