The still-face response in newborn, 1.5-, and 3-month-old infants
Section snippets
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Kerstin Träger, Caterina Böttcher, Wenke Möhring, and Andrea Kobiella for data collection and coding as well as the parents and infants for their participation in this study. The study was funded in part by the Sofja Kovelevskaja Prize of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation to Tricia Striano. A fuller report of this study will be provided upon request.
References (16)
- et al.
Newborns’ preferential tracking for face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline
Cognition
(1991) - et al.
The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to face interaction
Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry
(1978) - et al.
The still face: A history of a shared experimental paradigm
Infancy
(2003) - et al.
Mother and infant activity and interaction in Japan and in the United States: A comparative macroanalysis of naturalistic exchange
International Journal of Behavioral Development
(1990) - Ellsworth, C. P. (1987). Person-object differentiation by young infants: The importance of affect measures in...
- et al.
Social competence and person-object differentiation: An analysis of the still-face effect
Developmental Psychology
(1993) - et al.
Discrimination and imitation of facial expression by neonates
Science
(1983) Receptive language development in infancy
Merrill-Palmer Quarterly
(1970)
Cited by (45)
Influences of infants’ and mothers’ contingent vocal responsiveness on young infants’ vocal social bids in the Still Face Task
2022, Infant Behavior and DevelopmentCitation Excerpt :Five- and six-month-old infants tend to increase their non-distress vocalizations during the still face phase relative to the interactive phases (Bourvis et al., 2018; Franklin et al., 2014; Goldstein et al., 2009). However at these ages, infant smiling during the still face phase shows decreases relative to the interactive phases (Ekas, Haltigan, & Messinger, 2013; Adamson & Frick, 2003), similar to decreases in smiling during the still face phase seen at earlier ages (Bertin & Striano, 2006; Nadel, Soussignan, Canet, Libert & Gerardin, 2005). Infants younger than five and six months may not show increases in non-distress vocalizations in the still face phase relative to the interactive phases, as seen in older infants (Bourvis et al., 2018; Franklin et al., 2014; Goldstein et al., 2009).
The newborn's smile through the eyes of the parent
2021, Neuropsychiatrie de l'Enfance et de l'AdolescenceNeonatal Transitions in Social Behavior and Their Implications for Autism
2018, Trends in Cognitive SciencesActive sleep is associated with the face preference in the newborns who familiarized with a responsive face
2017, Infant Behavior and DevelopmentCitation Excerpt :It is possible that newborns are attracted by their mother’s face (Field, Cohen, Garcia, & Greenberg, 1984; Sai, 2005) and not by an unfamiliar face (a stranger) previously known during an habituation paradigm as a still face, because the mother’s face, being responsive, meets an expectation of communication. Recent studies demonstrated that three-month old infants (Bertin and Striano, 2006) and also newborns (Nagy, 2008) spent less time looking at a face when it became a freeze face (still-face situation). Moreover, when newborns were engaged in the habituation paradigm with motionless mother’s face, they preferred the novel face in a successive preference task suggesting that the direction of infants’ preference could depend on the habituation task used (Scott and Nelson, 2004; Cecchini, Baroni, Di Vito, Piccolo, & Lai, 2011).
Social visual engagement in infants and toddlers with autism: Early developmental transitions and a model of pathogenesis
2015, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews