Invited Review
Making sense of all the conflict: A theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The error-related negativity (ERN) is modulated by attention to the target stimulus.

  • N2, N450, and conflict SP are distinct potentials.

  • Conflict adaptation provides a tool to examine conflict-related control.

  • Application in clinical populations could lead to treatment options.

Abstract

Cognitive control theory suggests that goal-directed behavior is governed by a dynamic interplay between areas of the prefrontal cortex. Critical to cognitive control is the detection and resolution of competing stimulus or response representations (i.e., conflict). Event-related potential (ERP) research provides a window into the nature and precise temporal sequence of conflict monitoring. We critically review the research on conflict-related ERPs, including the error-related negativity (ERN), Flanker N2, Stroop N450 and conflict slow potential (conflict SP or negative slow wave [NSW]), and provide an analysis of how these ERPs inform conflict monitoring theory. Overall, there is considerable evidence that amplitude of the ERN is sensitive to the degree of response conflict, consistent with a role in conflict monitoring. It remains unclear, however, to what degree contextual, individual, affective, and motivational factors influence ERN amplitudes and how ERN amplitudes are related to regulative changes in behavior. The Flanker N2, Stroop N450, and conflict SP ERPs represent distinct conflict-monitoring processes that reflect conflict detection (N2, N450) and conflict adjustment or resolution processes (N2, conflict SP). The investigation of conflict adaptation effects (i.e., sequence or sequential trial effects) shows that the N2 and conflict SP reflect post-conflict adjustments in cognitive control, but the N450 generally does not. Conflict-related ERP research provides a promising avenue for understanding the effects of individual differences on cognitive control processes in healthy, neurologic and psychiatric populations. Comparisons between the major conflict-related ERPs and suggestions for future studies to clarify the nature of conflict-related neural processes are provided.

Section snippets

Introduction: cognitive control and conflict monitoring

Cognitive control theory provides an influential model for understanding the specific roles and neuroanatomical substrates of prefrontal cortex function (e.g., Botvinick et al., 2001, Miller and Cohen, 2001, O'Reilly et al., 2010, Shenhav et al., 2013). Cognitive control specifically refers to the ability to guide thoughts and actions in accord with internal intentions (Miller and Cohen, 2001). Two main component processes necessary for the accurate completion of goal-directed behavior are

The error-related negativity

The error negativity (Ne; Falkenstein et al., 1991) or error-related negativity (ERN; Gehring et al., 1993) is a response-locked ERP that occurs within 100 ms of an erroneous response and has been localized to the ACC (Brazdil et al., 2005, Bush et al., 2000, Stemmer et al., 2004, van Veen and Carter, 2002a; see Fig. 1). The ERN is relatively robust across multiple sensory modalities (Miltner et al., 1997) during tasks that involve the inhibition of prepotent or automatic responses (e.g., the

Stimulus-locked ERPs associated with conflict monitoring

Additional support for the role of conflict monitoring in the recruitment of cognitive control comes from stimulus-locked ERP research using paradigms such as the Eriksen Flanker Task (Eriksen and Eriksen, 1974) and the Stroop task (MacLeod, 1991, Stroop, 1935). For example, two functionally-related cognitive control indices of conflict monitoring are the N2 and N450, respectively. Both of these ERPs are thought to reflect ACC-mediated signaling for dynamic modulations of cognitive control (

Comparing the N2 and N450 stimulus-locked ERPs

The N2 and N450 belong to the conflict-monitoring family of ERPs and seem to represent similar cognitive control signals related to conflict monitoring (see Folstein and Van Petten, 2008). However, nuanced differences between the two components may shed light on the distinction between the functional significance of the N2 and N450. Comparing tasks with various congruent/incongruent trial probability ratios may be helpful in distinguishing these two components. Previous research indicates that

Summary and conclusions

Summarizing this large body of information provides interesting insights into the role of ERPs in our understanding of conflict-related processing. Returning to the original questions summarized from the early Botvinick et al. (2001) and Yeung et al. (2004, 2006) papers, current ERP evidence provides some interesting topics for discussion. First, the ERN and N2 ERPs provide some index of conflict-related processing. However, the precise functional significance of the N450 and conflict SP ERPs

References (192)

  • C.C. Duncan et al.

    Evaluation of traumatic brain injury: brain potentials in diagnosis, function, and prognosis

    Int. J. Psychophysiol.

    (2011)
  • S. Durston et al.

    Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial event-related fMRI

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • T. Egner et al.

    The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task

    NeuroImage

    (2005)
  • T. Endrass et al.

    Overactive performance monitoring in obsessive–compulsive disorder: ERP evidence from correct and erroneous reactions

    Neuropsychologia

    (2008)
  • M. Falkenstein et al.

    Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1991)
  • M. Falkenstein et al.

    ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial

    Biol. Psychol.

    (2000)
  • I.H. Franken et al.

    Error-processing deficits in patients with cocaine dependence

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • G. Hajcak et al.

    Error-related psychophysiology and negative affect

    Brain Cogn.

    (2004)
  • G. Hajcak et al.

    Oops!.. I did it again: an ERP and behavioral study of double-errors

    Brain Cogn.

    (2008)
  • G. Hughes et al.

    Dissociable correlates of response conflict and error awareness in error-related brain activity

    Neuropsychologia

    (2011)
  • J.G. Kerns

    Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task

    NeuroImage

    (2006)
  • M.J. Larson et al.

    Cognitive conflict adaptation in generalized anxiety disorder

    Biol. Psychol.

    (2013)
  • M.J. Larson et al.

    Performance monitoring following conflict: internal adjustments in cognitive control?

    Neuropsychologia

    (2012)
  • M.J. Larson et al.

    Cognitive control in mild traumatic brain injury: conflict monitoring and conflict adaptation

    Int. J. Psychophysiol.

    (2011)
  • M.J. Larson et al.

    The relationship between performance monitoring, satisfaction with life, and positive personality traits

    Biol. Psychol.

    (2010)
  • M.J. Larson et al.

    What are the influences of orthogonally-manipulated valence and arousal on performance monitoring processes? The effects of affective state

    Int. J. Psychophysiol.

    (2013)
  • M.J. Larson et al.

    Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task

    Neuropsychologia

    (2009)
  • C. Alain et al.

    Neurophysiological evidence of error-monitoring deficits in patients with schizophrenia

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2002)
  • D.M. Amodio et al.

    Neurocognitive components of the behavioral inhibition and activation systems: implications for theories of self-regulation

    Psychophysiology

    (2008)
  • M.T. Banich

    Executive function the search for an integrated account

    Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.

    (2009)
  • B.D. Bartholow et al.

    Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: beyond errors and response conflict

    Psychophysiology

    (2005)
  • A. Bechara

    Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2005)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory — Second Edition (BDI-II)

    (1996)
  • C. Beste

    Stimulus–response compatibility in Huntington's disease: a cognitive-neurophysiological analysis

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2008)
  • L.M. Binder et al.

    A review of mild head trauma. Part I: meta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies

    J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol.

    (1997)
  • M. Botvinick et al.

    Conflict monitoring and cognitive control

    Psychol. Rev.

    (2001)
  • M.W. Botvinick et al.

    Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex

    Nature

    (1999)
  • T.S. Braver et al.

    Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2001)
  • M. Brazdil et al.

    Intracerebral error-related negativity in a simple go/no-go task

    J. Psychophysiol.

    (2005)
  • J.W. Brown et al.

    Learned predictions of error likelihood in the anterior cingulate cortex

    Science

    (2005)
  • C.S. Carter et al.

    Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance

    Science

    (1998)
  • C.S. Carter et al.

    Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: an update of theory and data

    Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • P.H. Chiu et al.

    Neural evidence for enhanced error detection in major depressive disorder

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • L. Chouiter et al.

    High and low stimulus-driven conflict engage segregated brain networks, not quantitatively different resources

    Brain Topogr.

    (2014)
  • A. Clawson et al.

    Cognitive control adjustments and conflict adaptation in major depressive disorder

    Psychophysiology

    (2013)
  • P.E. Clayson et al.

    The effects of induced state negative affect on performance monitoring processes

    Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci.

    (2012)
  • P.E. Clayson et al.

    Effects of repetition priming on neurophysiological and behavioral indices of conflict adaptation and cognitive control

    Psychophysiology

    (2011)
  • P.E. Clayson et al.

    Cognitive performance and electrophysiological indices of cognitive control: a validation study of conflict adaptation

    Psychophysiology

    (2012)
  • P.E. Clayson et al.

    Psychometric properties of conflict monitoring and conflict adaptation indices: response time and conflict N2 event-related potentials

    Psychophysiology

    (2013)
  • J.D. Cohen et al.

    Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: who's in control?

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (315)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    All authors contributed equally and are considered co-first-authors.

    View full text