Affective and physiological responses to environmental noises and music
Introduction
Emotional reactions can be evoked by stimuli in different sensory modalities. Those associated with processing pictures have been extensively investigated and several studies have provided evidence for a correspondance between physiological variables (skin conductance, heart rate, startle blink reflex, facial EMG, brain activity) and the emotional dimensions of valence and arousal (see Hamm et al., 2003 for review). We recently investigated respiratory responses while viewing affective pictures using the same dimensional framework (Gomez et al., 2004a). Several respiratory measures were found to covary with judgments of valence and arousal. To extend our knowledge of respiratory responses during affective processing, we investigated in this study affective and respiratory reactions while listening to environmental noises and musical passages.
Both noises and music are sound-vibrations. However, one would be hard-pressed to call the crying of a baby, a siren or a ringing telephone ‘music’. Thus, differences must exist between what we normally call noises and what we normally call music. These differences may be associated with different processing of the two types of acoustic stimuli and reflect themselves in different physiological responses. Theories of auditory event perception have highlighted a distinction between ‘everyday’ and ‘musical’ listening (Gaver, 1993). However, this account of listening in two ways has been recently challenged by Dibben (2001).
Only one study has assessed physiological responding (skin conductance, heart rate, startle blink reflex, facial EMG) to a large sample of naturally occurring sounds (Bradley and Lang, 2000). To our knowledge, no study has yet explored the relationships between self-reported affective responses and respiratory reactions to natural noises. A number of studies have investigated affective and physiological responses to music (for review see Bartlett, 1996). In her doctoral thesis, Witvliet (1998) adopted the framework of valence and arousal to assess the effects of music on skin conductance, heart rate, facial EMG, and the startle reflex. Few studies, however, have assessed respiratory responses (Krumhansl, 1997, Nyklı́cek et al., 1997) and none have included a detailed breathing analysis as recommended by respiratory psychophysiologists (Wientjes, 1992, Boiten et al., 1994).
The available evidence concerning the relation between emotions and respiration indicates that more rapid breathing is associated with increases in arousal (e.g. Nyklı́cek et al., 1997, Boiten, 1998, Van Diest et al., 2001). Until now, no clear relationship between respiratory volume and emotional dimensions have been obtained (Boiten, 1998, Gomez et al., 2004a, Gomez et al., 2004b). Mean inspiratory flow and minute ventilation increase with increases in arousal (Boiten et al., 1994, Boiten, 1998, Gomez et al., 2004a) but may also be influenced by the affective valence of the stimuli (Gomez et al., 2004a). Finally, very little is known about the influence of affective stimuli on the relative contribution of the rib cage and the abdomen to respiratory volume (Boiten, 1998).
The main purpose of the present study was to assess the relationships between judgments of affective valence and arousal and physiological responses to noises and to music. To this end, we presented 16 noise sources and 16 musical fragments to 31 participants, each lasting 30 s in duration. We recorded respiration, skin conductance level, heart rate and judgments of valence and arousal. Moreover, we were interested in comparing the two-dimensional distribution of valence and arousal ratings for noises and musical fragments.
Section snippets
Participants
Participants were 16 men and 15 women, mostly university students, ranging in age from 18 to 37 years (mean age 24 years). They reported no long-term hearing impairment and were healthy on the day of testing. They were asked to avoid drinking coffee and alcoholic beverages prior to the experiment.
Affective stimuli
Participants listened to 16 noises and 16 musical fragments with a duration of 30 s each. The 32 stimuli were selected from a larger sample of 25 noises and 25 music excerpts based on evaluation in
Range and distribution
Table 1, Table 2 present means and S.D.s of the affective ratings for the 16 environmental noises and the 16 musical selections, respectively. Acoustic stimuli varied dramatically both in rated valence and arousal. For noises, valence ranged from 1.97 (pneumatic hammer) to 7.81 (little stream with bird twitter), whereas arousal ranged from 2.64 (little stream with bird twitter) to 7.87 (siren). For music, valence ranged from 3.19 (Adagio for strings, S. Barber) to 7.13 (Titan, G. Mahler),
Discussion
In this study, we investigated the relationships between physiological parameters and subjective reports of affective valence and arousal while listening to environmental noises and musical passages.
Both similarities and differences emerge when comparing the results for noises and music. Increasing arousal was associated with faster breathing and higher MV for both types of stimuli. For music, this relation was present over the entire affective space, for noises essentially for positive
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Ronny Ott for his assistance in conducting this experiment and Dr Werner A. Stahel for his statistical advise.
References (44)
The effects of emotional behaviour on components of the respiratory cycle
Biol. Psychol.
(1998)- et al.
Emotions and respiratory patterns: review and critical analysis
Int. J. Psychophysiol.
(1994) - et al.
Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential
J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry
(1994) - et al.
MIXREG: a computer program for mixed-effects regression analysis with autocorrelated errors
Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed.
(1996) Respiration in psychophysiology: methods and applications
Biol. Psychol.
(1992)- et al.
Emotional imagery: effect of autonomic response information on physiological arousal
Cognition Emotion
(1990) Physiological responses to music and sound stimuli
- et al.
Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
(2001) - et al.
Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli
Psychophysiology
(2000) - et al.
Perceived and physiological indicators of relaxation: as different as Mozart and Alice in chains
Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback
(1999)
Physical effects and motor responses to music
J. Res. Music Educ.
Development of the happy–sad distinction in music appreciation – Does tempo emerge earlier than mode?
What do we hear, when we hear music?: music perception and musical material
Musicae Scientiae
Effects of music on respiration and heart-rate
Am. J. Psychol.
Sociality of solitary smiling: potentiation by an implicit audience
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
Emotional expression in music
What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception
Ecol. Psychol.
Effects of perceived musical rhythm on respiratory pattern
J. Appl. Physiol.
Motivational organization of emotions: autonomic changes, cortical responses, and reflex modulation
Cited by (196)
The effects of music and auditory stimulation on autonomic arousal, cognition and attention: A systematic review
2024, International Journal of PsychophysiologyConstruction noise effects on human health: Evidence from physiological measures
2023, Sustainable Cities and SocietyEmotions and physiological responses elicited by neighbours sounds in wooden residential buildings
2022, Building and EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :A similar study that utilised emotion (i.e. pleasantness and arousal) and physiological responses (i.e. HR, and fEMG) [28] found that unpleasant soundscape recordings led to a decrease in HR and an increase in fEMG activity in the corrugator muscle group. Similarly, Gomez and Danuser [16] highlighted significant relationships between arousal ratings and HR for environment noise and between arousal ratings and EDA for music. Moreover, a similar approach was taken by Irwin et al. [33], who found that HR was not significantly altered by the pleasantness of urban soundscape recordings.
Prediction of occupational exposure limits for noise-induced non-auditory effects
2022, Applied Ergonomics