Making time for mindfulness

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • HBCSSs must be compatible with users lives and values to be used and be effective.

  • People struggle to fit app use into busy urban lifestyles.

  • The Reasoned Action Approach accounts for many aspect of take-up and use.

  • Use of mindfulness app is also influenced by emotions and expectations.

Abstract

Objective

Digital mental wellbeing interventions are increasingly being used by the general public as well as within clinical treatment. Among these, mindfulness and meditation programs delivered through mobile device applications are gaining popularity. However, little is known about how people use and experience such applications and what are the enabling factors and barriers to effective use. To address this gap, the study reported here sought to understand how users adopt and experience a popular mobile-based mindfulness intervention.

Methods

A qualitative semi-structured interview study was carried out with 16 participants aged 25–38 (M = 32.5) using the commercially popular mindfulness application Headspace for 30–40 days. All participants were employed and living in a large UK city. The study design and interview schedule were informed by an autoethnography carried out by the first author for thirty days before the main study began. Results were interpreted in terms of the Reasoned Action Approach to understand behaviour change.

Results

The core concern of users was fitting the application into their busy lives. Use was also influenced by patterns in daily routines, on-going reflections about the consequences of using the app, perceived self-efficacy, emotion and mood states, personal relationships and social norms. Enabling factors for use included positive attitudes towards mindfulness and use of the app, realistic expectations and positive social influences. Barriers to use were found to be busy lifestyles, lack of routine, strong negative emotions and negative perceptions of mindfulness.

Conclusions

Mobile wellbeing interventions should be designed with consideration of people's beliefs, affective states and lifestyles, and should be flexible to meet the needs of different users. Designers should incorporate features in the design of applications that manage expectations about use and that support users to fit app use into a busy lifestyle. The Reasoned Action Approach was found to be a useful theory to inform future research and design of persuasive mental wellbeing technologies.

Introduction

The penetration of ubiquitous technologies into every corner of our lives provides excellent opportunities for new forms of health and wellbeing interventions. [1] Among these technologies, mobile applications offer cost-effective methods of healthcare delivery. Mobile devices are carried with the user throughout the day, can connect to the internet and can deliver interventions using features such as push notifications, text based information and rich media content. These features make mobile devices particularly suitable for the delivery of mental wellbeing interventions [2]. Consequently, there is a growing market for consumer healthcare applications that deliver interventions such as stress reduction and anxiety management programs. If such technologies are to be effective vehicles for health behaviour change, then it is necessary to understand both how they are used in practice, what are the key features of experience, and what are the barriers and enablers of use. A deeper understanding of these issues will contribute to theoretical discussions about the design of e-health technologies and persuasive design (see, for example, [3], [4]). The study reported here investigated how people adopted one mental wellbeing app (Headspace, www.headspace.com), how they fitted use into their lives, and how they experienced use over time.

Section snippets

Background

Mindfulness is a growing area in the field of e-mental health, within and outside clinical practice. Mindfulness is “a state of psychological freedom that occurs when attention remains quiet and limber, without attachment to any particular point of view”. [5] Many claims have been made for the efficacy of mindfulness for mental wellbeing. Advocates argue that increased mindfulness is correlated with greater self-control [6], objectivity [7], concentration [8], capacity to deal with stress [9]

Objectives

In order to develop effective mental wellbeing technologies and improve current interventions for behaviour change, it is essential to understand the relationship between users and the technology. This involves understanding complex psychological phenomena and behaviours occurring over time, to deliver design recommendations for future development of such technologies. As noted above, although studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of mindfulness and meditation delivered through

Preparatory study: autoethnography

Autoethnography is a research method where the researcher becomes a participant in order to enter into an empathic relationship with users. For instance, O’Kane et al. [36] present an autoethnography of using a wrist blood pressure monitor over a three month period to better understand the experience of using a device to help manage a long-term health condition. Krizek [37] argues that researchers must recognise that autoethnography provides a limited, subjective insight into the user

Semi-structured interview study methods

A semi-structured interview study was carried out to explore the user experience of Headspace. Three-month download codes were donated by Headspace to give participants full access to the content. Participants downloaded the application onto their smartphones and signed up for their free three-month period of use. They were asked to use the application in a self-directed way. Semi-structured interviews were conducted prior to the trial period to explore expectations and intentions. An exit

Results

Most participants began the study with the intention to use the app on a regular basis. However, four participants came to the conclusion within three uses that they did not want to use the app. This was explored in their exit interviews and their reasons are presented below.

In presenting the findings, we begin by summarising the reported patterns of use. In subsequent sections, we present the core theme of fitting use of the app into everyday life, followed by other factors that shaped the

Discussion

In this section, we re-visit the findings, relating them to the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA) to behaviour change. The study illuminates ways in which conditions affect users of the application, and how the design of the technology facilitates and prohibits mindfulness meditation practices; we therefore also discuss implications for design, and also limitations of our study.

Conclusion

In this study, the Reasoned Action Approach was found to be a valuable theoretical framework for analysing and understanding behaviour and experience.

To be truly effective, behaviour change technologies need to work with people’s lifestyles, values and expectations. This research revealed that the primary concern of users of a mobile mindfulness application was fitting use of the application into their lives. User responses to this concern were influenced by a number of interrelated factors.

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest to declare.

Contributions

This paper reports on a study completed by the first author as part of his Masters research. The second author is the corresponding author.

The contributions of the authors are as follows:

  • James Laurie: conducted the study, including all data collection and primary data analysis; drafted first version of this paper.

  • Prof Ann Blandford: primary supervisor for Laurie’s MSc; oversaw the design of the study; gave guidance on data collection and analysis; edited the paper (through several iterative

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr David Cox and Headspace for their generosity in providing access to Headspace for participants, and to all participants for their time, energy and thoughtful input.

References (45)

  • J.R. Martin

    Mindfulness: a proposed common factor

    J. Psychothe. Integr.

    (1997)
  • E.J. Masicampo et al.

    Relating mindfulness and self-regulatory processes

    Psychol. Inquiry

    (2007)
  • M.R. Leary et al.

    The multi-faceted nature of mindfulness

    Psychol. Inquiry

    (2007)
  • S. Young, The science of enlightenment. Boulder, CO : Sounds True....
  • P.R. Fulton

    Mindfulness as clinical training

  • J. Kabat-Zinn

    Full catastrophe living: the program of the stress reduction clinic at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center

    New York: Delta

    (1990)
  • W. Kuyken et al.

    Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy to prevent relapse in recurrent depression

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (2008)
  • K.W. Chen et al.

    Meditative therapies for reducing anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Depress. Anxiety

    (2012)
  • L. Davis et al.

    Mindfulness Based treatment for people with severe mental illness: a literature review

    Am. J. Psychiatric Rehabil.

    (2012)
  • H.B. Beckman et al.

    The impact of a program in mindful communication on primary care physicians

    Acad. Med.

    (2012)
  • S.K. Bostock et al.

    Can finding headspace reduce work stress? Randomised controlled workplace trial of mindfulness app

    Psychosom. Med.

    (2013)
  • JWT

    10 Trends that will shape our world in 2014.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (77)

    • A mindfulness meditation mobile app improves depression and anxiety in adults with sleep disturbance: Analysis from a randomized controlled trial

      2021, General Hospital Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, additional barriers such as travel, time commitment (e.g., 8–12 sessions, 90 min each), and cost impact their wide dissemination. Recently there has been an increased focus on using mobile applications (apps) to deliver mindfulness meditation [14]. Mobile apps allow individuals to have access to brief mindfulness exercises at any time, for free or low cost, and without the need of a trained provider.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text