Elsevier

International Journal of Cardiology

Volume 223, 15 November 2016, Pages 412-417
International Journal of Cardiology

Short-term and long-term prognostic outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by profound cardiogenic shock undergoing early extracorporeal membrane oxygenator-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.068Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

This study investigated the 30-day and long-term prognostic outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated with profound cardiogenic shock (CS) undergoing early routine extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO)-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

Between December 2005 and December 2014, 65 consecutive STEMI patients with profound CS underwent routine ECMO-supported primary PCI.

Results

The incidences of acute pulmonary edema, respiratory failure with requirement of mechanical ventilatory support upon presentation, and 30-day mortality rate were 100%, 95.4%, and 43.1%, respectively. The duration of hospitalization, mean long-term follow-up, and survival rate were 32.1 ± 53.1 (days), 733.6 ± 986.7 (days), and 32.3%, respectively. The mean APACHE score (32.6 ± 8.3 vs. 28.5 ± 7.5), peak serum creatinine level (4.3 ± 2.4 vs. 1.7 ± 1.2 mg/dL), incidences of failed ECMO weaning (57.1% vs. 0%), successful ECMO weaning but in-hospital death (40.0% vs. 0%) were significantly lower in 30-day survivors than those in non-survivors (all p < 0.05), whereas final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI)-3 flow [53.6% vs. 91.9%] showed an opposite pattern compared to that of APACHE score in the two groups (p < 0.02). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that unsuccessful reperfusion, failed ECMO weaning, and peak creatinine level were independent predictors of 30-day mortality (all p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Early ECMO-supported primary PCI in STEMI patients with profound CS was feasible as a life-saving strategy with acceptable 30-day and long-term prognostic outcomes.

Introduction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) had been identified as the leading cause of death in patients hospitalized for cardiovascular diseases [1], [2], [3]. However, with the improvement of pharmacological treatment [4], [5], [6], advanced technique of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [7], [8], [9], shortening of door-to-balloon time for patients with acute ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) [10], [11], flexible utilization of mechanical device for circulatory support [12], [13], [14] in situations of unstable hemodynamics, and active cardiac rehabilitation programs [15], [16], reperfusion therapy has remarkably decreased the mortality rate of patients with STEMI [4], [17], [18] as compared to that in the pre-reperfusion era worldwide [19].

Nevertheless, the in-hospital mortality rate of the subgroup of STEMI patients complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) is still unacceptably high despite reperfusion therapy [14], [20], [21] with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support and the long-term outcome remains unfavorable [14], [22], [23]. Indeed, our previous study has further demonstrated that the incidence of profound shock in the setting of CS was greater than 21% and that the clinical outcome was extremely poor for patients with STEMI complicated by profound CS [12], [14]. Therefore, reduction of short-term and long-term mortality for STEMI patients with profound CS undergoing primary PCI is the real therapeutic goal for this subgroup of patients.

Growing data have revealed that extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO)-assisted primary PCI appears to be an effective modality for improving in-hospital survival for patients with STEMI complicated by CS, especially in those with profound CS undergoing primary PCI [14], [24], [25], [26]. However, the sample sizes in these studies [14], [24], [25], [26] were relatively small. Besides, the long-term outcome of patients with profound CS undergoing primary PCI has not been reported. Moreover, the fact that ECMO support was highly selective for patients in most of these studies [24], [25], [26] is not consistent with real-world clinical practice.

Kaohsiung Chang Memorial Hospital is a tertiary medical center for providing patients with critical care in various disease settings, including those with STEMI in extremely unstable condition. A program for ECMO-support primary PCI for eligible patients with STEMI complicated by profound CS has been started at the institute since 2005. Our study was a descriptive observational design. Thus, in this study, we could only investigate the characteristics that were related with a poor prognosis in patients with STEMI complicated by profound CS undergoing early routine ECMO-supported primary PCI.

Section snippets

Patient population

All patients with acute STEMI, including those with STEM complicated by CS, are considered eligible for primary PCI at our institute. Since 2005, our hospital has a program of routine application of ECMO for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) complicated by profound CS routinely undergoing urgent or primary PCI. Between December 2005 and December 2014, totally 122 patients with ACS complicated by profound CS undergoing ECMO-supported PCI were identified. Of these patients, 57 patients

Baseline characteristics of the study patients (Table 1)

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of both groups of patients (i.e., group 1 was 30-day survivors and group 2 was 30-day non-survivors). Twenty-eight patients succumbed within 30 days in the current study, giving a mortality rate of 43.1% (28/65). There were no significant differences in terms of age, gender and the incidences of coronary artery disease risk factors including hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus current smoking, as well as the incidence of previous PCI

Discussion

This study, which investigated the impact of routine ECMO-supported primary PCI on STEMI patients complicated by profound CS, yielded several striking clinical implications. First, patients with profound CS always present with extremely serious manifestations that require immediate intervention. Second, when combined with EMCO support, all of these patients could receive complete PCI procedure. Third, early ECMO-supported primary PCI salvaged dying patients and, therefore, played an essential

Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of our study highlight that ECMO-supported primary PCI may be a new weapon for salving moribund patient in the setting of STEMI complicated by profound CS.

Conflict of interest

The authors have disclosed that they do not have any conflicts of interest.

References (35)

  • H. Thiele et al.

    Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: design and rationale of the intraaortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial

    Am. Heart J.

    (2015)
  • H. Thiele et al.

    Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial

    Lancet

    (2013)
  • Y.S. Chen et al.

    Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis

    Lancet

    (2008)
  • T.H. Tsai et al.

    Estimated glomerular filtration rate as a useful predictor of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

    Am. J. Med. Sci.

    (2013)
  • J.S. Chen et al.

    Analysis of the outcome for patients experiencing myocardial infarction and cardiopulmonary resuscitation refractory to conventional therapies necessitating extracorporeal life support rescue

    Crit. Care Med.

    (2006)
  • G.W. Stone et al.

    Intracoronary abciximab and aspiration thrombectomy in patients with large anterior myocardial infarction: the INFUSE-AMI randomized trial

    JAMA

    (2012)
  • L. Wallentin et al.

    Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    All authors take responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.

    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text