Elsevier

International Journal of Cardiology

Volume 199, 15 November 2015, Pages 197-203
International Journal of Cardiology

Analysis of associations between congenital heart defect complexity and health-related quality of life using a meta-analytic strategy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.07.045Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

As a consequence of heterogeneous results of relatively small individual trials, the impact of congenital heart defects (CHD) and the effect of disease severity on patient reported outcome measures (PROs) of quality of life (QoL) remains uncertain. We aimed to systematically summarize QoL data in CHD patients using meta-analytic methods.

Methods and results

We performed a systematic review of the literature focusing on QoL in CHD. The search yielded 234 publications meeting the inclusion criteria, with a median of 88 patients per study (46% females, average age 24 years). In total, QoL was reported using PROs in 47,471 CHD-patients. More than 95 different PROs were used to evaluate QoL. The most commonly used tool was the SF36 form (69 publications). Analysis of available quantitative QoL data from SF36 publications (n = 4217 CHD patients) showed that QoL was reduced in patients with moderate or complex cardiac disease (e.g. relative physical functioning scores 0.96 [0.93–0.99] and 0.91 [0.88–0.95] compared with controls), while no such effect was evident in those patients with simple cardiac lesions. Similar results were found for the general health domain of the SF36 domain.

Conclusions

Despite the proliferation of QoL-studies in CHD no standardized approach for measuring and reporting QoL has emerged and the published results are heterogeneous. In aggregation, however, the results of this study suggest that QoL is impaired in moderate or complex CHD, while no such impact of CHD on QoL could be established — on average — in patients with simple defects.

Introduction

In the current era, over 90% of children born with congenital heart disease (CHD) in developed countries survive to adulthood, most of them living relatively normal lives with good long-term survival prospects [1], [2]. With improving survival rates the focus of attention has shifted from mortality to morbidity, functional capacity and ultimately quality of life (QoL). Anticipating this move, Joseph Perloff argued in 1973 that “our ultimate goal … should focus on the quality of long-term survival … [and] to bring the individual to the peak of his[/her] physical capability” [3]. Testimony to this trend is a growing number of publications addressing functional aspects of patients' lives such as symptoms and objective exercise capacity. In addition, an increasing number of studies have been aiming to assess health-related QoL directly in CHD cohorts by applying patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), mostly questionnaires quantifying different aspects of QoL. As there is currently no consensus regarding the definition of QoL, many researchers have employed the World Health Organization's definition of health to investigate health-related QoL based on the five domains physical and mental health, level of independence, social relationships and environmental factors [4]. Unfortunately, the available primary evidence on health-related QoL in CHD is heterogeneous, sometimes even contradicting. This can partially be explained by differences in employed methods. After application of vigorous selection criteria, previous reviews have been able to describe these differences, [5], [6], [7], [8] but a quantitative meta-analysis of the existing data has not been achieved so far. Despite a large number of studies investigating QoL across the full spectrum of CHD patients, the effect of defect complexity on QoL is uncertain.

The aim of the current study was to systematically review the currently available literature on QoL in CHD with a particular focus on quantitative methods aiming to combine the results comparable with studies to overcome the limitations of small patient numbers and provide aggregate estimates on the association between CHD and CHD-sub-groups on different dimensions of QoL.

Section snippets

Search strategy

The PubMed online library was searched on April 25th 2014 for a combination of the phrases “quality of life” or “QoL” and a set of terms relating to all forms of congenital heart disease (Suppl. Table 1). After removal of duplicate results, studies were excluded based on language criteria (n = 66, Suppl. Fig. 1). All papers were screened by one author (PCK) and further papers were excluded if they met the following criteria: i) studies not including CHD patients (n = 213), ii) studies on relatives

Systematic search of the PubMed online library

Our systematic search resulted in a total list of 1015 publications, published between 1974 and 2014, that included the phrase “quality of life” in addition to a reference to CHD. After exclusion, 234 studies remained and were included in the further analyses (Suppl. Fig. 1). We found that the publication of studies that apply PROs in the setting of CHD showed an exponential increase over time (Fig. 1), with the maximum of published studies in 2013 (n = 45) and with ≈ 90% of studies being

Discussion

Using a systematic overview of the literature and meta-analytic methods we documented a growing interest in QoL in CHD patients over the last decades. Unfortunately, QoL-studies in this population are heterogeneous and difficult to compare due to the broad spectrum of CHD and the usage of more than 95 different QoL-instruments in the literature. Overall, however, we found significantly decreased QoL scores in the general health and physical functioning domains of the widely used SF36

Conclusions

Self-reported quality of life in CHD patients is — on aggregate — excellent and, in many domains of self-reported QoL as well as various CHD sub-populations indistinguishable from healthy individuals. Nevertheless, our findings indicate significant reductions of QoL in patients with moderate or high complexity CHD for the physical functioning and general health domains based on the most widely utilized PRO, the SF36 questionnaire.

The following are the supplementary data related to this article.

Funding sources

This study was supported by a research grant from the EMAH Stiftung Karla Voellm, Krefeld, Germany. Further funding was provided by the Cusanuswerk (to P.C.K.) and the German Research Foundation DFG (KA4018/1-1 to P.C.K.).

References (34)

  • T. Fteropoulli et al.

    Quality of life of adult congenital heart disease patients: a systematic review of the literature

    Cardiol. Young

    (2013)
  • R. Knowles

    Newborn screening for congenital heart defects: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

    Health Technol. Assess.

    (2005)
  • B. Latal et al.

    Psychological adjustment and quality of life in children and adolescents following open-heart surgery for congenital heart disease: a systematic review

    BMC Pediatr.

    (2009)
  • J.E. Ware et al.

    The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection

    Med. Care

    (1992)
  • J.O. Friedrich et al.

    The ratio of means method as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: a simulation study

    BMC Med. Res. Methodol.

    (2008)
  • W. Viechtbauer

    Conducting meta analyses in R with the metafor package

    J. Stat. Softw.

    (2010)
  • H.I. Sairanen et al.

    Late results and quality of life after pediatric cardiac surgery in Finland: a population-based study of 6461 patients with follow-up extending up to 45 years

    Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. Pediatr. Card. Surg. Annu.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Physical Functioning, Mental Health, and Quality of Life in Different Congenital Heart Defects: Comparative Analysis in 3538 Patients From 15 Countries

      2021, Canadian Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A control group could have allowed us to put our findings more into perspective. However, a meta-analysis comprising 234 studies indicated that patients with moderate or complex CHD generally have worse physical functioning yet equal mental health, compared with healthy persons.4 Patients with mild heart defects did not differ from healthy persons.4

    • Effects of Congenital Heart Disease Treatmenton Quality of Life

      2019, American Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In our analysis, we saw that the severity of the patient's condition has an influence on the baseline scores of most investigated components of HRQoL. This is consistent with part of the existing literature and especially with the review studies of Fteropouli et al2 and Kahr et al,3 which suggest that more complex conditions are associated with poorer HRQoL, mainly with regard to its physical components. It is noteworthy that other studies report contrasting results, as they were not able to show a definitive relation between CHD complexity and HRQoL.23,24

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text