Prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease in an outpatient cardiac CT angiography environment
Introduction
The cost of invasive angiography with its attendant risk has encouraged the development of new diagnostic methods that allow the coronary arteries to be visualized non-invasively. Over the last 10 years, great strides have been made in the field of cardiac imaging, particularly in the ability to visualize the coronary lumen with sufficient diagnostic accuracy [1]. Being such a modality, CTA is now being increasingly used in clinical practice.
The limitations of cardiac catheterization include risks (arterial puncture, iodinated contrast) and the need for multiple staff members including a nurse, the physician, and technologists — add to these the costs incurred during the procedure and the ensuing observational period. These limitations notwithstanding, cardiac catheterization is the only method currently available for defining the details of the entire coronary vascular anatomy, and it provides the reference standard against which other tests are compared [1], [2]. A feasible non-invasive coronary imaging modality like CTA will help avoid unnecessary diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and will significantly reduce the costs and complications associated with this invasive procedure [9], [21].
Section snippets
Methods
Four hundred and ninety-three (493) consecutive patients who underwent CTA for evaluation of obstructive CAD were included in this study: 343 men and 150 women with an average age of 59 years (18 to 87 years). Referred patients generally had an intermediate pre-test probability of obstructive disease (20–80%) as we have previously described [3]. CTA was requested for indications including: chest pain, shortness of breath, abnormal or equivocal stress test, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart
Coronary computed tomographic angiography protocol
The studies were performed with an E-Speed electron beam scanner (GE-Imatron, South San Francisco, California). The procedure of coronary CTA had been previously described [3], [4], [5], [6]. Briefly, 35 slices of a non-contrast scan was performed craniocaudally (3-mm section thickness without gap) to obtain the coronary calcium scores. Then, a flow study was performed (8 mm section thickness with 4 mm intersection gap) to obtain the circulation time (the time from the contrast injection in the
Results
Baseline Clinical Characteristics of the study group: Age (58 ± 12 years), Males (n = 299 [68%]), Diabetes mellitus (n = 48 [11%]), Hypertension (n = 259 [59%]), Hyperlipidemia (n = 187 [42%]), Current smoking (n = 40 [9%]), Positive stress test (n = 102 [23%]), equivocal stress test (n = 189 [43%]), angina pectoris (n = 76 [17%]), anginal equivalent (n = 44 [10%]. The vast majority (67%) of patients referred for CTA in our cohort consisted of patients with a stress test that was abnormal, non-diagnostic,
Discussion
It has been suggested that CTA may be helpful to rule out the presence of significant CAD and to avoid invasive coronary angiography in patients with a low to intermediate clinical likelihood of significant CAD. Previous studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of CTA as compared to cardiac catheterization. Two studies done at this institution demonstrated accuracy of over 90%, with negative predictive values of 96 and 98% for the presence of obstructive disease [9], [10].
More recently,
Risk of invasive angiography compared with CT angiography
The procedure is associated with a small but definable risk. A survey by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions indicated that the total risk of all major complications (including mortality) from coronary angiography is approximately 2% [22]. The most common risk is associated with arterial puncture and advancement of the catheter retrogradely up the aorta to the ostium of each coronary artery. The catheter can dislodge aortic plaque, which can dissect the artery or embolize,
Limitations of the study
Impaired image quality, due to dense calcifications and multiple image artifacts including coronary artery motion and breathing artifacts, limits the clinical utility of non-invasive coronary angiography [23]. In this study, 8% of all patients had non-diagnostic studies, with most due to dense calcifications.
We utilized a cutpoint of 50% luminal severity due to the inexactness of measuring stenosis on CTA. Symptomatic lesions with greater than 50%–75% diameter stenosis are generally considered
References (24)
- et al.
Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2003 Dec 3) - et al.
Indications for coronary angiography: changes in laboratory practice over a decade
Mayo Clin Proc
(1986) - et al.
ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines)
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2002) - et al.
ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/ NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2006) - et al.
Methodology for improved detection of coronary stenoses with computed tomographic angiography
Am Heart J
(Dec. 2004) - et al.
Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound
J Am Coll Cardiol
(Jul. 5 2005) - et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2005) - et al.
Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2004) - et al.
Comparison of visibility and diagnostic capability of noninvasive coronary angiography by eight-slice multidetector-row computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography
Am J Cardiol
(2004) - et al.
Continuous probabilistic prediction of angiographically significant coronary artery disease using electron beam tomography
Circulation
(Apr. 16 2002)
Coronary artery motion during the cardiac cycle and optimal ECG triggering for coronary artery imaging
Invest Radiol
Improved reproducibility of coronary artery calcium scoring by electron beam tomography with a new ECG trigger method
Invest Radiol
Cited by (18)
Clinical outcomes following a strategy of optimized medical management and selective "downstream" procedures following coronary computed tomography angiography
2013, International Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :Conceivably, more intense medication use may have contributed to the decrease in clinical events observed in our study. In addition, increase in the frequency of downstream non-invasive testing and cardiac procedures with increasing severity of atherosclerosis likely contributed to our findings [36,37]. Among the patients with moderate and severe stenosis, downstream testing and procedure use were high, but the pattern of testing differed in the two subgroups.
Positive predictive value of computed tomography coronary angiography in clinical practice
2012, International Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :Since we investigated patients that were clinically referred for non-invasive evaluation of chest pain, our findings better reflect daily clinical practice. Other studies investigating patients undergoing CTCA for clinical indications found even lower numbers for prevalence of obstructive CAD (19–21%) [8,22]. However, in these studies no data of ICA were reported.
Factors determining success in percutaneous revascularization of chronic total coronary occlusion: Multidetector computed tomography analysis
2012, Revista Espanola de CardiologiaPrognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2011, Journal of the American College of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :The abstract or full text of the 39 remaining studies were evaluated to determine eligibility. Twenty-one studies (14,15,23,25,28,41–56) were excluded after further review for reasons outlined in Figure 1. Eighteen studies were identified for inclusion from the literature search (7,8,10–12,16–22,24,26–30).
Quantification of regional calcium burden in chronic total occlusion by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography and procedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention
2010, International Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :Among these factors, recent reports have suggested that the presence of calcification is the most important predictor for procedural failures [2,3]. Recent advancements in MDCT technology have improved coronary imaging quality with a higher resolution, and, compared to fluoroscopy, MDCT shows much higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting calcified coronary plaques and has the advantage that it can quantify the calcification [4,5]. In addition, occlusion length, which also may play an important role as a predictive factor, can be better assessed with MDCT than coronary angiography.
HDL-associated factors provide additional prognostic information for coronary artery disease as determined by multi-detector row computed tomography
2010, International Journal of Cardiology