Prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease in an outpatient cardiac CT angiography environment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.06.062Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the prevalence of significant obstructive disease and non-diagnostic studies using coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in an outpatient environment, to establish if CTA could help avoid unnecessary diagnostic cardiac catheterizations.

Methods

We evaluated all cases consecutively performed in our outpatient CTA laboratory seen over one year with an indication that could warrant a cardiac catheterization to establish the presence or absence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Excluded were patients without established indications for cardiac catheterization and those with known CAD (i.e.— prior myocardial infarction, revascularization). Four hundred and ninety-three (493) CTA case studies were included for the analysis. Patients were classified as normal (no luminal irregularities seen), non-obstructive coronary disease (< 50% stenosis), significant obstructive coronary disease (> 50% stenosis), or a non-diagnostic study. We assumed that all patients assigned to the obstructive CAD group and the non-diagnostic study group would require a cardiac catheterization. In the remaining two groups, a cardiac catheterization would not be necessary for diagnosis or treatment.

Results

Of the 493 index cases evaluated, 157 (32%) cases were reported to be normal, 204 patients were classified as having non-obstructive disease (41%), 93 patients were defined to have obstructive CAD (19%), and 39 cases were inconclusive (8%). Thus, in 27% of the study population, a conventional coronary angiography would be indicated to clarify the diagnosis or provide definitive disease severity for subsequent revascularization.

Conclusion

Among ambulatory patients referred for CT angiography with symptoms or positive (or equivocal) cardiac stress tests, 73% of patients were found to have either normal coronary arteries or non-obstructive disease. Given the high negative predictive power of cardiac CTA (93–99%), these patients most likely would not require subsequent invasive coronary angiography. A strategy of selective cardiac catheterization may substantially decrease unnecessary diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and reduce health care expenses.

Introduction

The cost of invasive angiography with its attendant risk has encouraged the development of new diagnostic methods that allow the coronary arteries to be visualized non-invasively. Over the last 10 years, great strides have been made in the field of cardiac imaging, particularly in the ability to visualize the coronary lumen with sufficient diagnostic accuracy [1]. Being such a modality, CTA is now being increasingly used in clinical practice.

The limitations of cardiac catheterization include risks (arterial puncture, iodinated contrast) and the need for multiple staff members including a nurse, the physician, and technologists — add to these the costs incurred during the procedure and the ensuing observational period. These limitations notwithstanding, cardiac catheterization is the only method currently available for defining the details of the entire coronary vascular anatomy, and it provides the reference standard against which other tests are compared [1], [2]. A feasible non-invasive coronary imaging modality like CTA will help avoid unnecessary diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and will significantly reduce the costs and complications associated with this invasive procedure [9], [21].

Section snippets

Methods

Four hundred and ninety-three (493) consecutive patients who underwent CTA for evaluation of obstructive CAD were included in this study: 343 men and 150 women with an average age of 59 years (18 to 87 years). Referred patients generally had an intermediate pre-test probability of obstructive disease (20–80%) as we have previously described [3]. CTA was requested for indications including: chest pain, shortness of breath, abnormal or equivocal stress test, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart

Coronary computed tomographic angiography protocol

The studies were performed with an E-Speed electron beam scanner (GE-Imatron, South San Francisco, California). The procedure of coronary CTA had been previously described [3], [4], [5], [6]. Briefly, 35 slices of a non-contrast scan was performed craniocaudally (3-mm section thickness without gap) to obtain the coronary calcium scores. Then, a flow study was performed (8 mm section thickness with 4 mm intersection gap) to obtain the circulation time (the time from the contrast injection in the

Results

Baseline Clinical Characteristics of the study group: Age (58 ± 12 years), Males (n = 299 [68%]), Diabetes mellitus (n = 48 [11%]), Hypertension (n = 259 [59%]), Hyperlipidemia (n = 187 [42%]), Current smoking (n = 40 [9%]), Positive stress test (n = 102 [23%]), equivocal stress test (n = 189 [43%]), angina pectoris (n = 76 [17%]), anginal equivalent (n = 44 [10%]. The vast majority (67%) of patients referred for CTA in our cohort consisted of patients with a stress test that was abnormal, non-diagnostic,

Discussion

It has been suggested that CTA may be helpful to rule out the presence of significant CAD and to avoid invasive coronary angiography in patients with a low to intermediate clinical likelihood of significant CAD. Previous studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of CTA as compared to cardiac catheterization. Two studies done at this institution demonstrated accuracy of over 90%, with negative predictive values of 96 and 98% for the presence of obstructive disease [9], [10].

More recently,

Risk of invasive angiography compared with CT angiography

The procedure is associated with a small but definable risk. A survey by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions indicated that the total risk of all major complications (including mortality) from coronary angiography is approximately 2% [22]. The most common risk is associated with arterial puncture and advancement of the catheter retrogradely up the aorta to the ostium of each coronary artery. The catheter can dislodge aortic plaque, which can dissect the artery or embolize,

Limitations of the study

Impaired image quality, due to dense calcifications and multiple image artifacts including coronary artery motion and breathing artifacts, limits the clinical utility of non-invasive coronary angiography [23]. In this study, 8% of all patients had non-diagnostic studies, with most due to dense calcifications.

We utilized a cutpoint of 50% luminal severity due to the inexactness of measuring stenosis on CTA. Symptomatic lesions with greater than 50%–75% diameter stenosis are generally considered

References (24)

  • B. Lu et al.

    Coronary artery motion during the cardiac cycle and optimal ECG triggering for coronary artery imaging

    Invest Radiol

    (2001)
  • S.S. Mao et al.

    Improved reproducibility of coronary artery calcium scoring by electron beam tomography with a new ECG trigger method

    Invest Radiol

    (Jul. 2001)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Clinical outcomes following a strategy of optimized medical management and selective "downstream" procedures following coronary computed tomography angiography

      2013, International Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Conceivably, more intense medication use may have contributed to the decrease in clinical events observed in our study. In addition, increase in the frequency of downstream non-invasive testing and cardiac procedures with increasing severity of atherosclerosis likely contributed to our findings [36,37]. Among the patients with moderate and severe stenosis, downstream testing and procedure use were high, but the pattern of testing differed in the two subgroups.

    • Positive predictive value of computed tomography coronary angiography in clinical practice

      2012, International Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since we investigated patients that were clinically referred for non-invasive evaluation of chest pain, our findings better reflect daily clinical practice. Other studies investigating patients undergoing CTCA for clinical indications found even lower numbers for prevalence of obstructive CAD (19–21%) [8,22]. However, in these studies no data of ICA were reported.

    • Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The abstract or full text of the 39 remaining studies were evaluated to determine eligibility. Twenty-one studies (14,15,23,25,28,41–56) were excluded after further review for reasons outlined in Figure 1. Eighteen studies were identified for inclusion from the literature search (7,8,10–12,16–22,24,26–30).

    • Quantification of regional calcium burden in chronic total occlusion by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography and procedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention

      2010, International Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among these factors, recent reports have suggested that the presence of calcification is the most important predictor for procedural failures [2,3]. Recent advancements in MDCT technology have improved coronary imaging quality with a higher resolution, and, compared to fluoroscopy, MDCT shows much higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting calcified coronary plaques and has the advantage that it can quantify the calcification [4,5]. In addition, occlusion length, which also may play an important role as a predictive factor, can be better assessed with MDCT than coronary angiography.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text