Academic work, the Internet and U.S. college students

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.07.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore, based on a nationally representative sample, U.S. college students' uses of the Internet in their studies and their perceptions of academic life online, and changes in both perception and use since a 2002 report on the topic. Findings show that overall Internet use for academic purposes has increased. Students report generally positive opinions about the Internet's utility for academic work, but satisfaction with it for academic interactions may be on the decline.

Introduction

With record levels of college enrollment (National Survey of Student Engagement, 2006), large numbers of young Americans are spending their college years at institutions of higher learning that in many ways appear quite dissimilar from those attended by their parents and generations previous. Information and communication technology (ICT) and the Internet have become central to academic life on countless college and university campuses across the United States. From the rise of “e-learning” and web-based instruction, to online libraries and research tools, to computer-mediated student–professor interaction, college students today negotiate many aspects of their academic lives online.

The 2002 Pew Internet and American Life Project report, “The Internet Goes to College” (Jones) examined college students' use of the Internet. (NB: All references in the text to the “2002 report” or “2002 survey” are to this report.) Jones reports that in addition to recreational and social uses, students made significant use of the Internet in their academic lives, “as an educational tool supplementing traditional classroom education” (p. 19) that has “greatly changed the way they interact with others and with information as they go about their studies” (p. 2). Reports on students and faculty perceptions of ICT and feelings about their impact on college life are mixed. Some express optimism about the pedagogical potential of Internet-based instruction and research tools on university campuses (Cramer et al., 2007, Grabe et al., 2004–2005–2005). Others express concern that technologies are being used in limited ways (Selwyn, 2007), and that students are not equipped to evaluate much of the information they encounter online (D'Esposito and Gardner, 1999, Janes, 2007, Jenson, 2004, Metzger et al., 2003, Wang and Artero, 2005). Academics and public commentators have weighed in on these issues, but how do students feel?

Kirkwood and Price (2005) stress the importance of hearing directly from students regarding their perceptions of and attitudes towards the Internet and ICT as educational tools and (increasingly important) aspects of student life. They assert, “students' perceptions of the educational benefits of a medium are more significant than its intrinsic characteristics” (p. 270). Moreover, scholars suggest that students' attitudes towards and perceptions of the Internet affect their Internet self-efficacy (Peng, Tsai, & Wu, 2006). It is thus of central importance to assess students' perceptions of their academic environments and the role that the Internet plays, as Internet-based tools become increasingly commonplace and central to students' experiences at institutions of higher learning.

The aim of this study is to explore, based on a nationally representative sample, college students' uses of the Internet in their studies and their perceptions of academic life online, and changes in both perception and use since the 2002 report. What does the incorporation of ICT, Internet-based instruction, and online research tools, to name a few, mean for today's college students' university experiences? What role does the Internet play in college students' academic routines? Has this changed since 2002, and if so, in what ways? What are the implications for faculty–student interactions? How does the Internet affect students' research and writing habits during university? What are the consequences for students' information literacy? This study aims to look at college students' academic uses of and attitudes towards the Internet, and compare the findings to those of the 2002 report.

Section snippets

The Internet on campus

Universities provide an environment for technological diffusion. Goldfarb (2006) argues that in the 1990s, universities “taught a generation of students how to use the Internet” (p. 203) and fostered its diffusion. During that time, universities provided necessary equipment and programs for students to go online and to use a technology to which they may not have otherwise had access. Many universities required that students use the Internet for various administrative and course-related

Methodology

During the Spring 2005 academic term an online survey of college students was conducted at two-year and four-year public and private colleges and universities in the continental United States. Participants were recruited through use of mass e-mail to all students at 29 college campuses, and to a random sample of students stratified by class (Freshman, Sophomore, etc.) at 11 other campuses, a total population of 386,189 students. Recruitment yielded 7421 complete surveys, a response rate of 2%.

Results and discussion

College students continue to have a positive opinion about the Internet's impact on their educational experience. Indeed, the percentage of college students with a positive opinion has risen to 84%, as against 79% in 2002. But, of today's college students 7% disagree with a positive assessment of the Internet's impact on their academic experience, compared to 4% in 2002. Far fewer are now of the belief that its impact has been neutral, with 8% choosing that response today compared with 16%

Conclusion

While there are notable changes in college students' Internet use for academic purposes between 2002 and 2005 (see Table 5) the change is evolutionary rather than revolutionary.

One of the most interesting and important areas of difference is in the realm of student–professor online interaction. Students overall reported a slight decline in preference for using email to contact professors. Students also report less satisfaction with their email contact with professors. Amongst the students who

References (32)

  • GrabeM. et al.

    Providing introductory psychology students access to online lecture notes: the relationship of note use to performance and class attendance

    Journal of Educational Technology Systems

    (2004–2005)
  • HembroffL.A.

    Michigan State University student health assessment: Spring 2006

    (2006)
  • JacksonL.A. et al.

    Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching

    Sex Roles

    (2001)
  • JanesJ.

    Why Johnny can't search

  • JensonJ.D.

    It's the information age, so where's the information? Why our students can't find it and what we can do to help

    College Teaching

    (2004)
  • JonesS.

    The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today's technology

  • Cited by (68)

    • Identifying factors that influence students performance through social networking sites: An exploratory case study

      2020, Heliyon
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are many activities that can be carried out online: web searching, online chatting, email, blogging, instant messaging, which has facilitated cooperation among students (Hrastinski and Aghaee, 2012), gaming (Cotten, 2008), and online meetings (Mazer et al., 2007). In academic life at university, online activities have become central to day-to-day life (Jones et al., 2008). Greenhow (2011) argued that using SNSs in an academic context is all about developing inventive ideas and sharing them with other users, as well as receiving support and recommendations about class assignments or other day-to-day issues that arise during study, which increase and boost the interaction between students in a shorter time.

    • Measuring students’ perceptions of online learning in higher education

      2020, International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text