Changing Chinese values: Keeping up with paradoxes
Introduction
In the 5000 years of Chinese history, the past three decades (1978–2008) of the People's Republic of China (PRC) have proportionally elicited changes that probably not a single Western observer has been able to foresee. A direct consequence of China's “open-door” policy since 1978 is that Chinese society is now in direct contact with foreign concepts, technologies, cultures and lifestyles. Globalization, foreign direct investment (FDI) and the Internet are exposing China, for the first time in its history, to unprecedented global knowledge transfer, information sharing and cultural learning.
The impact of China's modernization during the past 30 years on the modification of Chinese social and business behaviours is salient. However, one must question the changes at a deeper level—that of people's values. Indeed, China seems to have never given up its single most important cultural characteristic, the ability to manage paradoxes. Ancient Chinese society was an oxymoron melting pot. In the current age of globalization, Chinese society has retained and reinforced this unique feature even in the most significant sociocultural changes. A constant reality of China has been its outstanding capability for keeping up with paradoxes throughout its history including the current period.
In this article, we discuss paradoxical values that coexist in today's Chinese society observed at least in the economically developed coastal regions at the forefront of China's modernization. By “paradoxical values” we mean seemingly contradictory value orientations both of which can nonetheless be true within the same society. We firstly argue that there is a need to move beyond classical Western methodology to study culture, especially Chinese culture. A Yin Yang perspective of culture is used to capture the complexity of Chinese values. Then, paradoxical values in today's Chinese society are discussed with reference to business and society at large. Our observations do not reflect different aspects of a segmented society but rather patterns of contradictions manifested within the Chinese society.
Section snippets
Understanding Chinese culture through Yin Yang
In international business and management literature, the concept of culture has been thoroughly investigated by way of cultural dimensions (e.g., Hofstede (1980), Hofstede (1991), Hofstede (2001)). This approach is based on the bipolarization of national cultures measured along a continuum in which each national culture finds its fixed positioning. The USA is, for instance, an individualistic culture as opposed to a collectivistic culture such as China. China is classified as a long-term
Chinese values: Paradoxes and continuities
Chinese values have been discussed widely in international business and management literature (Bond & Hofstede, 1989; Campbell & Adlington, 1988; Child (1990), Child (1994); Chinese Culture Connection, 1987; Fang (1999), Fang (2003), Fang (2006b); Faure (1998), Faure (1999); Hofstede, 1991; Hsiao, Jen, & Lee, 1990; Lockett (1990), Lockett (1988); Porter, 1996). The traditional Chinese culture is described as a complex product of three different and often contradictory value systems:
Conclusion
Two centuries ago, Hegel (1956, p. 168) made the following comment on the “immobility” of the Middle Kingdom: “… the Chinese history is still essentially without history; it is only the repetition of the same magnificent ruin”. Closer to our present time, Teilhard de Chardin (1956, p. 241) spoke about China as a “malleable and tenacious bloc”. This double proposition seems to apply in today's China as well given its flexibility in terms of assimilation, adaptation, and capacities of learning
References (57)
- et al.
The benefits of guanxi: The value of relationships in developing the Chinese market
Industrial Marketing Management
(1995) Questioning guanxi: Definition, classification and implications
International Business Review
(2002)The rise of East Asia: Implications for research on cultural variations and globalisation
Journal of International Management
(2006)- Beech, H. (2006) Sex, please? We’re young and Chinese. Time Asia (Sunday, January 15)....
Beyond the Chinese face: Insights from psychology
(1991)- et al.
The cash value of confucian values
Human Systems Management
(1989) A source book in Chinese philosophy
(1963)Three-dimensional Chinese rationales in negotiation
- et al.
China business strategies
(1988)
Inside Chinese business: A guide for managers worldwide
Management in China during the age of reform
Chinese values and the search for culture free dimensions of culture
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Chinese business negotiating style
A critique of Hofstede's fifth national culture dimension
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management
From onion to ocean: Paradox and change in national cultures
International Studies of Management & Organization
Negotiation: The Chinese style
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
Nonverbal negotiation in China
Negotiation Journal
Negotiation: The Chinese concept
Negotiation Journal
The cultural dimension of negotiation: The Chinese case
Group Decision and Negotiation
Traditional conflict management in Africa and China
Les joint-ventures en Chine et leur négociation
Les négociations en Chine
Chinese culture and negotiation: Strategies for handling stalemates
China CEO: Voices of experience from 20 international business leaders
Cited by (227)
The Tech Cold War, the multipolarization of the world economy, and IB research
2023, International Business ReviewThe Tech Cold War: What can we learn from the most dynamic patent classes?
2023, International Business ReviewThe paradox and change of Russian cultural values
2022, International Business ReviewCitation Excerpt :The Yin Yang thinking lends support to a number of the advances in the study of culture such as the concept of cultural sensemaking in contexts (Osland & Bird, 2000) and that of cultural frame shifting that views people as “capable of representing multiple cultures in their minds and switching between representations of cultures’ and other cultural concepts” (Hong, Morris, Chiu, & Benet-Martinez, 2000, p. 340). In this paper, we apply Faure and Fang’s (2008) eight pairs of paradoxical cultural values developed from the Chinese cultural context to study the dynamics of Russian culture with certain adaptations (see Table 2), given the parallels between China and Russia in terms of their evolution from socialism to market economy, albeit China is still officially a socialist country with Chinese characteristics. We emphasize the importance of the emic (culture-specific) concepts and indigenous phenomena in Russian culture that can be used to best explain and adapt the eight value pairs in Russian contexts.
Adoption of collaborative consumption as sustainable social innovation: Sociability and novelty seeking perspective
2022, Journal of Business ResearchCultivating sustainable consumption: The role of harmonious cultural values and pro-environmental self-identity
2024, Journal of Consumer Behaviour