Changing Chinese values: Keeping up with paradoxes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.02.011Get rights and content

Abstract

The impact of China's modernization during the past three decades (1978–2008) on the changes of Chinese behaviours is salient. However, these changes have had an even greater impact on Chinese values. Indeed, China seems to have never given up its single most important cultural characteristic, the ability to manage paradoxes. Ancient Chinese society was an oxymoron melting pot. In the current age of globalization, Chinese society has retained and reinforced this unique feature even in the most significant sociocultural changes. Through the analysis of eight pairs of paradoxical values, referring to business and society at large, the article argues that life in contemporary China has undergone significant cultural change. Nonetheless, in terms of the thinking process, modern Chinese society remains anchored to the classical Yin Yang approach.

Introduction

In the 5000 years of Chinese history, the past three decades (1978–2008) of the People's Republic of China (PRC) have proportionally elicited changes that probably not a single Western observer has been able to foresee. A direct consequence of China's “open-door” policy since 1978 is that Chinese society is now in direct contact with foreign concepts, technologies, cultures and lifestyles. Globalization, foreign direct investment (FDI) and the Internet are exposing China, for the first time in its history, to unprecedented global knowledge transfer, information sharing and cultural learning.

The impact of China's modernization during the past 30 years on the modification of Chinese social and business behaviours is salient. However, one must question the changes at a deeper level—that of people's values. Indeed, China seems to have never given up its single most important cultural characteristic, the ability to manage paradoxes. Ancient Chinese society was an oxymoron melting pot. In the current age of globalization, Chinese society has retained and reinforced this unique feature even in the most significant sociocultural changes. A constant reality of China has been its outstanding capability for keeping up with paradoxes throughout its history including the current period.

In this article, we discuss paradoxical values that coexist in today's Chinese society observed at least in the economically developed coastal regions at the forefront of China's modernization. By “paradoxical values” we mean seemingly contradictory value orientations both of which can nonetheless be true within the same society. We firstly argue that there is a need to move beyond classical Western methodology to study culture, especially Chinese culture. A Yin Yang perspective of culture is used to capture the complexity of Chinese values. Then, paradoxical values in today's Chinese society are discussed with reference to business and society at large. Our observations do not reflect different aspects of a segmented society but rather patterns of contradictions manifested within the Chinese society.

Section snippets

Understanding Chinese culture through Yin Yang

In international business and management literature, the concept of culture has been thoroughly investigated by way of cultural dimensions (e.g., Hofstede (1980), Hofstede (1991), Hofstede (2001)). This approach is based on the bipolarization of national cultures measured along a continuum in which each national culture finds its fixed positioning. The USA is, for instance, an individualistic culture as opposed to a collectivistic culture such as China. China is classified as a long-term

Chinese values: Paradoxes and continuities

Chinese values have been discussed widely in international business and management literature (Bond & Hofstede, 1989; Campbell & Adlington, 1988; Child (1990), Child (1994); Chinese Culture Connection, 1987; Fang (1999), Fang (2003), Fang (2006b); Faure (1998), Faure (1999); Hofstede, 1991; Hsiao, Jen, & Lee, 1990; Lockett (1990), Lockett (1988); Porter, 1996). The traditional Chinese culture is described as a complex product of three different and often contradictory value systems:

Conclusion

Two centuries ago, Hegel (1956, p. 168) made the following comment on the “immobility” of the Middle Kingdom: “… the Chinese history is still essentially without history; it is only the repetition of the same magnificent ruin”. Closer to our present time, Teilhard de Chardin (1956, p. 241) spoke about China as a “malleable and tenacious bloc”. This double proposition seems to apply in today's China as well given its flexibility in terms of assimilation, adaptation, and capacities of learning

References (57)

  • M.J. Chen

    Inside Chinese business: A guide for managers worldwide

    (2001)
  • Chen, W. H. (2006). Divorce rate surges across China (p. 3). China...
  • Child, J. (1990). Introduction: The character of Chinese enterprise management. In: J. Child, M. Lockett (Eds.),...
  • J. Child

    Management in China during the age of reform

    (1994)
  • China Luxury (2007). A plus. 〈http://www.hkicpa.org.hk/APLUS/0710/p24_29.pdf〉. Retrieved on...
  • Chinese Culture Connection

    Chinese values and the search for culture free dimensions of culture

    Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

    (1987)
  • T. Fang

    Chinese business negotiating style

    (1999)
  • T. Fang

    A critique of Hofstede's fifth national culture dimension

    International Journal of Cross Cultural Management

    (2003)
  • T. Fang

    From onion to ocean: Paradox and change in national cultures

    International Studies of Management & Organization

    (2006)
  • T. Fang

    Negotiation: The Chinese style

    Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing

    (2006)
  • G.O. Faure

    Nonverbal negotiation in China

    Negotiation Journal

    (1995)
  • G.O. Faure

    Negotiation: The Chinese concept

    Negotiation Journal

    (1998)
  • G.O. Faure

    The cultural dimension of negotiation: The Chinese case

    Group Decision and Negotiation

    (1999)
  • G.O. Faure

    Traditional conflict management in Africa and China

  • G.O. Faure

    Les joint-ventures en Chine et leur négociation

  • G.O. Faure

    Les négociations en Chine

  • G.O. Faure et al.

    Chinese culture and negotiation: Strategies for handling stalemates

  • J.A. Fernandez et al.

    China CEO: Voices of experience from 20 international business leaders

    (2006)
  • Cited by (227)

    • The paradox and change of Russian cultural values

      2022, International Business Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Yin Yang thinking lends support to a number of the advances in the study of culture such as the concept of cultural sensemaking in contexts (Osland & Bird, 2000) and that of cultural frame shifting that views people as “capable of representing multiple cultures in their minds and switching between representations of cultures’ and other cultural concepts” (Hong, Morris, Chiu, & Benet-Martinez, 2000, p. 340). In this paper, we apply Faure and Fang’s (2008) eight pairs of paradoxical cultural values developed from the Chinese cultural context to study the dynamics of Russian culture with certain adaptations (see Table 2), given the parallels between China and Russia in terms of their evolution from socialism to market economy, albeit China is still officially a socialist country with Chinese characteristics. We emphasize the importance of the emic (culture-specific) concepts and indigenous phenomena in Russian culture that can be used to best explain and adapt the eight value pairs in Russian contexts.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text