Elsevier

Human Movement Science

Volume 33, February 2014, Pages 343-353
Human Movement Science

The role of embodied simulation in mental transformation of whole-body images: Evidence from Parkinson’s disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2013.10.006Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Contrasting data are available on the role of embodied simulation in whole body processing.

  • Parkinson’s disease patients performed two own body and a letter rotation task.

  • Patients with left- or right-most affected side were enrolled for the study.

  • Patients failed in judging the side of back-facing body matching their most affected side.

  • Motor and non-motor transformations can be distinguished in whole body processing.

Abstract

It has been repeatedly demonstrated that mentally performing an action and mentally transforming body-parts entail simulation of one’s own body movements, consistent with predictions of embodied cognition theories. However, the involvement of embodied simulation in mental transformation of whole-body images is still disputed. Here, we assessed own body transformation in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients with symptoms most affecting the left or the right body side. PD patients were required to perform left–right judgments on front-facing or back-facing human figures, and a letter rotation task. Results demonstrated that PD patients were selectively impaired in judging the side of back-facing human figures corresponding to their own most affected side, but performed as well as healthy subjects on mental transformation of front-facing bodies and on letter rotation. These findings demonstrate a parallel impairment between motor and mental simulation mechanisms in PD patients, thus highlighting the specific contribution of embodied cognition to mental transformation of whole-body images.

Introduction

Classical psychophysical studies showed that when healthy participants have to judge whether a hand image with a specific spatial orientation is left or right (i.e., the hand laterality task) they imagine their own hand moving to match the stimulus orientation for responding (Parsons, 1987a, Parsons, 1994, Sekiyama, 1982). Moreover, making hand laterality judgments and executing a hand movement follow the same temporal profile and the same hand-specific joint-constraints (Conson et al., 2011, de Lange et al., 2006, Parsons, 1987a, Parsons, 1994, Sekiyama, 1982). Accordingly, specific impairments on the hand laterality task and spared mental transformation of object images have been reported in patients with severe motor disorders, such as locked-in syndrome (Conson et al., 2010, Conson et al., 2008), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Fiori et al., 2013a) or spinal cord injury (Fiori et al., 2013b). These observations consistently support the model of embodied cognition according to which cognitive processes are grounded in bodily states (Gallese & Sinigaglia, 2011). In this view, the same sensorimotor representations activated when performing an actual action are also involved in different “action-related phenomena” such as motor imagery (i.e., mental simulation of body-parts movements), action observation and imitation (Decety and Grèzes, 2006, Gallese and Sinigaglia, 2011, Jeannerod, 2001).

No clear data are available instead on the role of embodied simulation in mental transformation of whole-body images. In a seminal neuroimaging study, Zacks, Rypma, Gabrieli, Tversky, and Glover (1999) presented participants with front-facing or back-facing schematic human figures with one outstretched arm; in order to judge which arm was outstretched (i.e., left–right judgment), participants imagined themselves in the position of the figure. This own body transformation led to increased cortical activity in the temporo-parietal junction, as well as in other areas including the frontal cortex. Subsequent neurofunctional studies employing the same paradigm (Arzy et al., 2007, Arzy et al., 2006, Blanke et al., 2005) confirmed the involvement of the temporo-parietal junction in whole-body processing and suggested that whole-body transformations imply some sort of “rotation of the self” (Arzy et al., 2006, Arzy et al., 2007, Blanke et al., 2005). This evidence would suggest that, analogously to body-parts transformation, mental transformation of whole-body is grounded on embodied cognitive processes (Kessler & Thomson, 2010). However, other studies demonstrated that whole-body transformation can also be accomplished by resorting to an object-based, visuospatial transformation not related to one’s own body representation (Gardner et al., 2013, Kessler and Wang, 2012). For instance, Kessler and Wang (2012) reported that healthy individuals with low empathic abilities were more prone to rely on object rotation strategies to solve the own body transformation task. These findings would undermine the idea that whole-body transformation is dependent on actual sensorimotor information available in the agent’s brain.

In synthesis, the role of embodied simulation in whole-body transformation is not supported consistently. Strong clues on this issue could be provided by a behavioral study on patients with a well-defined damage of the motor system, such as Parkinson’s disease (PD).

Neuropsychological studies investigating mental transformation of body-parts in PD patients by means of the hand laterality task reported motor imagery asymmetries: patients mentally simulated movements more slowly with their most affected hand (Amick et al., 2006, Dominey et al., 1995). These results were confirmed by recent experiments in which PD patients performed the hand laterality task while keeping their arms in different postures (Helmich et al., 2007, van Nuenen et al., 2012). Taken together, available evidence supported the strong relationships between motor disorders and mental transformation of body-parts in PD patients. However, no evidence is available about mental transformation of whole-body images in this clinical population.

In the present study we required PD patients to perform own body transformation tasks requiring laterality judgments on a schematic human figure. If sensorimotor information is causatively involved in processing of whole-bodies, we can predict that PD patients would be impaired on own body transformation task, and that the side of motor impairment would affect behavioral performance, with opposite patterns in patients with left or right most affected side. More precisely, consistent with previous studies on mental transformation of body parts (Helmich et al., 2007, van Nuenen et al., 2012), we could expect that PD patients are specifically impaired in judging the body side corresponding to their own most affected side. Relevant here, we also assessed PD patients’ ability to perform mental rotation of letters that is thought not to involve one’s own body representation (Conson et al., 2008, Conson et al., 2010, Dalecki et al., 2012, Fiori et al., 2013a, Fiori et al., 2013b, Kosslyn et al., 1998). By these means we could ascertain whether any failure in own body transformation was associated with a generalized deficit in performing mental transformation tasks.

Section snippets

Participants

We screened consecutive PD patients attending the Movement Disorders Unit of the University of Naples Federico II (Naples, Italy) from February to June 2012. Patients were enrolled in the study if they met the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of idiopathic PD according to United Kingdom Parkinson’s Disease Society brain bank (Gibb & Lees, 1988); clinical and history evidence of asymmetric motor disturbances; lack of PD-associated dementia (PDD) as diagnosed according to an algorithm for

Overall performance

Pearson’s correlations showed significant negative correlations between overall accuracy and RTs in each group for all experimental tasks (healthy subjects: front-facing-OBT, r = −.432, p = .017; back-facing-OBT, r = −.456, p = .011; LRT, r = −.404, p = .025; left-most affected PD patients: front-facing-OBT, r = −.574, p = .032; back-facing-OBT, r = −.540, p = .041; LRT, r = −.493, p = .045; right-most affected PD patients: front-facing-OBT, r = −.528, p = .043; back-facing-OBT, r = −.539, p = .031; LRT, r = −.574, p = .024).

Discussion

We assessed PD patients on OBT tasks in order to investigate the contribution of embodied simulation to mental transformation of whole-body. To this aim, we tested whether patients’ most affected side influenced the ability to mentally manipulate whole-body images. The results demonstrated that PD patients were specifically impaired in judging laterality of the hand corresponding to their own most affected side when presented with back-facing human figures (back-facing-OBT). The correspondence

Conclusions

Here we demonstrated that the side of stronger motor impairment in PD patients can selectively affect whole-body mental transformations. We found comparable patterns of performance in PD patients and in healthy subjects on front-facing-OBT task and on LRT, consistent with evidence of unimpaired visuospatial transformations in this clinical population (Amick et al., 2006, Dominey et al., 1995). On the contrary, left- and right-most affected PD patients showed opposite patterns of impaired

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Italia Pagano and Daniela Culiers for their help in collecting the data.

References (46)

  • S.C. Fischer et al.

    Hemispheric differences for components of mental rotation

    Brain and Cognition

    (1988)
  • M. Folstein et al.

    Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinicians

    Journal of Psychiatric Research

    (1975)
  • V. Gallese et al.

    What is so special about embodied simulation?

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences

    (2011)
  • M.R. Gardner et al.

    Hand dominance influences the processing of observed bodies

    Brain and Cognition

    (2010)
  • R.C. Helmich et al.

    Cerebral compensation during motor imagery in Parkinson’s disease

    Neuropsychologia

    (2007)
  • S. Hétu et al.

    The neural network of motor imagery: An ALE meta-analysis

    Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

    (2013)
  • M. Jeannerod

    Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition

    Neuroimage

    (2001)
  • K. Kessler et al.

    The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: Embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference

    Cognition

    (2010)
  • L.M. Parsons

    Imagined spatial transformations of one’s hands and feet

    Cognitive Psychology

    (1987)
  • Y. Steggemann et al.

    Selective effects of motor expertise in mental body rotation tasks: Comparing object-based and perspective transformations

    Brain and Cognition

    (2011)
  • J. Zacks et al.

    Imagined transformations of bodies: An fMRI investigation

    Neuropsychologia

    (1999)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1994)
  • S. Arzy et al.

    Neural basis of embodiment: Distinct contributions of temporoparietal junction and extrastriate body area

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2006)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text