ClinicalHeart failureElectrophysiologic substrate and intraventricular left ventricular dyssynchrony in nonischemic heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy
Introduction
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing is a relatively new treatment modality designed to restore synchrony with the objective of improving cardiac mechanical performance in congestive heart failure.1, 2, 3, 4 CRT has been demonstrated to be clinically effective in 60% to 70% of patients, and its indication as therapy has increased exponentially over the last several years. A number of different echocardiographic measures have been used clinically to select potential CRT candidates. The recently concluded PROSPECT2 trial has shown that none of the echocardiographic measures provides a consistent basis for clinical decisions regarding CRT implants. The ECG QRS duration (QRSd) is deemed to be the most clinically relevant measure for CRT. Although CRT has been shown to benefit the majority of symptomatic patients with wide QRSd >130 ms, reports on the usefulness of CRT in moderate ranges of QRSd (100–130 ms) are conflicting. The RethinQ trial3 showed that CRT is not beneficial for patients with narrow QRSd. However, another recent study4 demonstrated potential short-term improvement with CRT in patients with QRSd <120 ms. This indicates that there may be heart failure patients with QRSd in the range from 100 to 130 ms who may respond well to CRT, but the measures of dyssynchrony used in RethinQ could not identify this group. With the reliability of echocardiographic measures in question (PROSPECT), the quest for an alternative measure of dyssynchrony in the context of CRT continues.
Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI)5, 6, 7, 8 is a novel imaging modality for cardiac electrophysiology, based on 250 body surface ECGs and an accurate, patient specific heart–torso anatomy derived from an ECG-gated computed tomographic scan. It noninvasively generates electroanatomic maps of epicardial potentials (voltage maps), electrograms, and activation and repolarization sequences. A previous study using ECGI in eight heart failure patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing CRT showed that the electrophysiologic substrate is extremely heterogeneous among these patients and that the efficacy of CRT depends strongly on the patient-specific substrate and pacing electrode placement relative to this substrate.8 This was a study in a very heterogeneous group of patients with varying degrees of coronary disease and ischemic cardiomyopathy. The objective of the current study is to characterize the left ventricular (LV) electrophysiologic substrate and electrical dyssynchrony in a population of nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients previously implanted with a CRT device. A quantitative index for LV electrical dyssynchrony is defined and computed, and its relationship with QRSd is studied.
Section snippets
Methods
ECGI was performed in each patient in each of the following rhythms: (1) biventricular CRT pacing (CRT); (2) LV pacing (LV-P); (3) right ventricular (RV) pacing (RV-P); and (4) nonpaced native rhythm (NAT), if applicable. Two patients had optimized interventricular (V-V) delays different from the nominal value, and ECGI was performed with both optimal (CRT-OPT) and nominal (CRT-NOM) V-V delays. The nominal V-V delay is the standard “factory” setting (simultaneous biventricular pacing).
Custom
Study population
Between January 2007 and April 2010, 25 heart failure patients (age 51 ± 18 years, range 6–68 years) with a CRT implant and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy were recruited retrospectively for the study. Patients were selected from the database of patients who were implanted with a CRT/CRT-ICD device and were being seen at the heart failure clinic at Barnes Jewish Hospital and/or St. Louis Children's Hospital. The following inclusion criteria were used for patient selection: patients without
LV electrophysiologic substrate
The native activation pattern in nonischemic cardiomyopathy is similar among patients, in contrast to the large variability observed in ischemic CRT patients by Jia et al.8 The activation pattern is characterized by lines of conduction block extending from base to apex and located between the epicardial aspect of the septum and the LV lateral wall. This results in U-shaped activation around the line of block and very delayed activation (later than 80th percentile of QRSd) of a large portion of
Acknowledgments
We thank Timothy Sekarski for superb technical expertise in acquiring the echocardiographic images and Timothy Street for capable assistance in performing computed tomographic scans for this study.
References (17)
- et al.
Electrocardiographic imaging of cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: observation of variable electrophysiologic responses
Heart Rhythm
(2006) - et al.
Characterization of left ventricular activation in patients with heart failure and left-bundle branch block
Circulation
(2004) - et al.
Results of the predictors of response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial
Circulation
(2008) - et al.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure with narrow QRS complexes
N Engl J Med
(2007) - et al.
Short-term hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure, a narrow QRS duration and no dyssynchrony
Circulation
(2009) - et al.
Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging for cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmia
Nat Med
(2004) - et al.
Activation and repolarization of the normal human heart under complete physiological conditions
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
(2006) - et al.
Cardiac memory in WPW patients: noninvasive imaging of activation and repolarization before and after catheter ablation
Circulation
(2008)
Cited by (50)
His Resynchronization Versus Biventricular Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block
2018, Journal of the American College of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :By calculating the shortest interval that spans 95% of activations recorded from the left ventricle (LVAT-95), we minimized the potential skewing of LV total activation time by noise and misannotation of outliers, while still measuring activation of almost the entire LV surface. Left ventricular dyssynchrony index (LVDI) was also calculated as the standard deviation of individual activations recorded from the LV, which has been proposed as a measure of intraventricular dyssynchrony (15). For each ventricular activation parameter, the average of 5 beats each was taken for AAI pacing, HBP, and BVP.
Cardiac electrical dyssynchrony is accurately detected by noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging
2018, Heart RhythmCitation Excerpt :Although the ECGi-derived LVTAT was neither significantly longer nor shorter than the recorded value (P = .56), the relationship was the weakest (R = 0.66) and SRes similar to TAT. Several markers have been developed to quantify electrical dyssynchrony between the ventricles (interventricular) or within the LV (intraventricular) using either body surface potentials14,15 or ECGi.6–11 It has largely been assumed that each of these metrics can accurately detect both small and large degrees of electrical dyssynchrony.
Do novel noninvasive ECG techniques improve patient selection for CRT?
2017, Heart Rhythm
The first two authors contributed equally to this work. This study was supported by Grants R01-HL-33343-26 and R01-HL-49054-18 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to Dr. Rudy. This publication was also made possible by Grant UL1 RR024992 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH. Dr. Rudy is the Fred Saigh Distinguished Professor at Washington University in St. Louis. Dr. Rudy co-chairs the scientific advisory board and holds equity in CardioInsight Technologies (CIT). CIT does not support any research conducted by Dr. Rudy, including that presented here.