Elsevier

Heart Rhythm

Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2011, Pages 76-83
Heart Rhythm

Clinical
Imaging/mapping
Endocardial unipolar voltage mapping to identify epicardial substrate in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.088Get rights and content

Background

The risk and success of epicardial substrate ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) support the value of techniques identifying the epicardial substrate with endocardial mapping.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that endocardial unipolar voltage mapping in patients with right ventricular (RV) VT and preserved endocardial bipolar voltage abnormalities might identify the extent of epicardial bipolar voltage abnormality.

Methods

Using a cutoff of <5.5 mV for normal endocardial unipolar voltage derived from 8 control patients without structural heart disease, 10 patients with known ARVC/D (group 1, retrospective) and 13 patients with RV VT (group 2, prospective) with modest or no endocardial bipolar voltage abnormalities underwent detailed endocardial and epicardial mapping.

Results

The area of epicardial unipolar voltage abnormality in all 10 group 1 patients with ARVC/D (62 ± 21 cm2) and in 9 of the 13 group 2 patients (8 with criteria for ARVC/D) (53 ± 21 cm2) was on average three times more extensive than the endocardial bipolar abnormality and correlated (r = 0.63, P <.05 and r = 0.81, P <.008, respectively) with the larger area epicardial bipolar abnormality with respect to size (group 1: 82 ± 22 cm2; group 2: 68 ± 41 cm2) and location. In the remaining 4 group 2 patients and 3 additional reference patients without structural heart disease, endocardial bipolar, endocardial unipolar, and, as predicted, epicardial bipolar voltage all were normal.

Conclusion

Endocardial unipolar mapping with cutoff of 5.5 mV identifies more extensive areas of epicardial bipolar signal abnormalities in patients with ARVC/D and limited endocardial VT substrate.

Introduction

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) is characterized by loss of cardiomyocytes with replacement by fibrofatty tissue.1 The pathologic process involves primarily the right ventricle (RV), resulting in ventricular tachycardia (VT) and RV dysfunction. Histopathologic studies have demonstrated an epicardial predominance of the fibrofatty tissue, suggesting that the disease process typically begins in the epicardium and progresses toward the endocardium.2, 3, 4, 5

Although the definitions of the typical perivalvular electroanatomic voltage abnormalities and irrigated catheters have improved the efficacy of endocardial VT catheter ablation in ARVC/D patients, success has not been uniformly achieved.6, 7, 8, 9 We recently described the use of a combined endocardial/epicardial substrate-based ablation approach to facilitate arrhythmia control in the setting of drug-refractory VT and previous failed endocardial ablation in an ARVC/D patient population.10 A characteristic finding in these select patients was the marked degree of bipolar electrogram abnormalities exhibited on the RV epicardial surface relative to the endocardial surface. A substrate-based ablation approach relying on the endocardium alone would underestimate the substrate burden. Thus, it becomes imperative to identify the presence of a more extensive epicardial substrate and the need for epicardial access, mapping, and ablation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether endocardial unipolar voltage mapping, which should provide a more global assessment of myocardial voltage, predicts the extent of epicardial substrate abnormalities in ARVC/D patients and in other RV VT patients with no or limited endocardial bipolar voltage abnormalities.

Section snippets

Defining normal RV endocardial unipolar electrograms

To establish a reference value for normal unipolar electrograms, we performed detailed RV endocardial sinus rhythm mapping in eight patients (6 men and 2 women, mean age 36 ± 18 years) without structural heart disease undergoing electrophysiologic evaluation after obtaining informed consent in accordance with the institutional guidelines of the University of Pennsylvania Health System. None of the eight reference patients were taking cardioactive drugs, and all had normal echocardiograms. All

Normal unipolar electrogram

From 105 to 164 endocardial RV electrograms were recorded per patient in the eight reference patients. Ninety-five percent of unipolar signals had an amplitude >5.5 mV and defined a normal unipolar electrogram amplitude. Dense scar for display purposes was arbitrarily defined as having a unipolar signal amplitude <3.5 mV.

Group 1: Retrospective analysis

Thirteen consecutive patients presenting with ARVC/D and documented VT underwent simultaneous endocardial and epicardial mapping. Three of the 13 patients had a significant

Discussion

In this study, we found that among ARVC/D patients with only modest (0%–42%) endocardial disease involvement as measured by endocardial bipolar voltage mapping, the degree of epicardial involvement was dramatically greater, thus confirming our prior observations. Moreover, endocardial unipolar voltage mapping defined the presence of and more closely approximated the greater extent of epicardial bipolar signal abnormalities that serve as a substrate for VT in the setting of ARVC/D.

Conclusion

This study describes a new technique for identifying the presence and anatomic extent of anticipated epicardial bipolar voltage abnormalities consistent with “scar” in patients with ARVC/D. The study defined normal unipolar RV endocardial signal as having an amplitude >5.5 mV and validated the use of endocardial unipolar voltage mapping to identify confluent areas of signals with an amplitude <5.5 mV as a strategy for approximating the degree and location of epicardial bipolar voltage

References (23)

  • A.P. Burke et al.

    Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and fatty replacement of the right ventricular myocardium: are they different diseases?

    Circulation

    (1998)
  • Cited by (212)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Drs. Marchlinski, Callans, and Hutchinson have received research support from Biosense Webster unrelated to the content of this manuscript. Dr. Haqqani is the recipient of an Overseas Training Fellowship (544309) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and the Bayer Fellowship from the Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

    View full text