Hemolysis in left ventricular assist device: A retrospective analysis of outcomes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2013.08.019Get rights and content

Background

Hemolysis is becoming increasingly recognized as a major complication of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Data regarding risk factors, prevalence, and outcomes are limited. To better define the characteristics and prognosis of hemolysis, we present a retrospective case-control study of LVAD patients in our institution.

Methods

A detailed record review was conducted of 18 patients supported with the HeartMate II (HMII; Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA) who were diagnosed with hemolysis, and their data were compared with 82 patients who received an LVAD implant during the same period who did not develop hemolysis. Patients were excluded if they did not survive hospitalization at the time of LVAD implantation. The primary end points of this analysis were time to death and time to first hospitalization.

Results

Of 100 total patients, 18 HMII patients (18%) were diagnosed with hemolysis. Those with hemolysis were younger, had significantly higher lactate dehydrogenase and bilirubin levels, lower international normalized ratio, and no difference in cannula velocities by transthoracic echocardiography. Patient survival in the hemolysis group was markedly decreased at 1 year (38.9% vs 89.3%, p < 0.001), but no differences in hospitalization (p = 0.57) were observed. Partial to complete thrombosis was noted in all of the pumps at explant.

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate that hemolysis is associated with high mortality, likely serving as a marker of pump thrombosis. Elevated lactate dehydrogenase and bilirubin levels are important indicators for hemolysis, and lower international normalized ratio may pre-dispose for this worrisome condition. Diagnosis should prompt clinicians to consider pump exchange or explant, listing for transplantation, or intensifying anti-coagulation.

Section snippets

Methods

Approval for this analysis to conduct this study was obtained from the Washington University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board. The requirement for patient consent was waived.

Results

Of 100 patients with HMII LVADs who met the inclusion criteria, 18 developed hemolysis. We excluded 36 patients, 19 due to alternative device placement (ie, HeartWare [HeartWare International Inc, Framingham, MA], SynCardia Total Artifical Heart [SynCardia Systems Inc, Tucson, AZ], Jarvik [Jarvik Heart, Inc, New York, NY], CentriMag [Levitronix, Waltham, MA]), and 17 who did not survive the index LVAD implant hospitalization. The mean time from implant to diagnosis of hemolysis was 168.2 ±

Discussion

Mechanical circulatory support for HF is a rapidly growing field with expanding indications. Large, randomized clinical studies have shown improved morbidity and mortality with continuous-flow LVADs compared with their pulsatile-flow predecessors.4 Although extremely effective for the treatment of HF, these devices are associated with a new set of complications that effect quality of life and survival. As the volume of patients supported with these devices continues to grow, so does the

Disclosure statement

G.A.E. receives research funding and consulting fees from Thoratec. S.S. receives research funding and consulting fees from Thoratec and educational grant funding from Abiomed.

None of the other authors have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of the presented manuscript or other conflicts of interest to disclose.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text