Community orientation of general practitioners in 34 countries
Introduction
Current changes in demography, epidemiology and ecology require general practitioners (GPs) to strengthen their community oriented approach. Community orientation of GPs and – broader – of primary care, means that care providers assume responsibility for the population in their practice area instead of only for those people that visit the practice. Community oriented service provision is sensitive to the health needs of the population [1]. This is facilitated by insight in population health issues, involvement of GPs in the community and involvement of the community in health related issues [2]. In this article we try to explain differences in community orientation of GPs in 34 countries.
A community oriented approach of GPs has become more important for several reasons. Ageing of the population leads to higher prevalence of chronic disease and multi-morbidity [3]. Chronic diseases are to a large extent life style related. People increasingly age in place [4], partly due to policies to contain long-term care costs [5] and partly due to preferences of elderly people themselves [6]. These changes in demography and epidemiology add to long-known ecological hazards, such as environmental pollution and occupational risks. They can be observed by GPs by looking into patterns of ill-health in their patient population. According to Wonca Europe (the scientific and academic association of European GPs) one of the core competences of GPs is ‘the ability to reconcile the health needs of individual patients and the health needs of the community in which they live in balance with available resources’ [1]. Consequently, taking responsibility only for those who visit the practice is not sufficient. A responsive, active and outreaching approach is needed. Primary care and health care in general are shifting from disease oriented care, e.g. in the form of disease management programmes [7] to patient oriented care where patients are seen as more than their disease and finally towards people-centred care [8]. The latter includes both an orientation towards persons and towards the local community [9].
In the definition of its founders, Community Oriented Primary Care (COPC) is defined by the following elements: the use of epidemiology and clinical skills to characterize the health needs of the community, assuming responsibility for a defined population, clear-defined programs to address communities’ health needs, community involvement, and accessibility to services [2].
Against this background, we analysed data from a multi-country survey among GPs to answer the following research questions:
- •
How does community orientation vary between countries and GPs or practices?
- •
How can this variation be explained by characteristics of GPs and characteristics of the organisation of their practices and of health care systems?
We use secondary data, collected in the international QUALICOPC study. In this study, community orientation has been measured by three survey questions on whether GPs would take action when confronted with repeated accidents in an industrial setting, frequent respiratory problems in patients living near a certain industry, and repeated cases of food poisoning in the local community. This measurement is less encompassing than the concept of COPC in its original formulations [2], but can be seen as approximation of the phenomenon.
Section snippets
Hypotheses
We have developed a number of hypotheses to guide the analyses. They relate to the potential influence of characteristics of the GPs, their practice, and the healthcare system they work in, as shown in Fig. 1.
At the country level, we expect that characteristics of thehealthcare system, the political composition of governments, and economic resources are related to the extent to which GPs have adopted a community oriented approach.
Data
The data on community orientation of GPs, GP practice and GP characteristics were collected in the EU co-funded QUALICOPC study (see Box 1) [30]. We use information from the survey among GPs in 34 countries, three of which are outside Europe and five European but not EU Member States. 7183 GPs participated in the survey; varying from 70 respondents in Malta to 535 in Canada. The development of the questionnaire and the data collection have been described elsewhere [31,32].
Measurements
The dependent variable
Results
The countries in our study substantially differ with respect to community orientation. GPs from Norway, Turkey, Spain and Italy perceived themselves as very community oriented. On the other part of the spectrum there are Cyprus, Estonia, Hungary and Germany (Fig. 2). Of the non-European countries Canada and Australia are in the lower third and New Zealand in the upper third of the distribution.
The variation between countries in the empty model is 13% (Table 1; random part).
The fixed part of
Discussion
In this article we have developed and tested a set of hypotheses about the community orientation of GPs. The hypotheses addressed differences between countries, between GP practices and between GPs. As regards country characteristics, our hypotheses about the strength of primary care, about the left-wing government and about economic resources were refuted. The hypothesis about national health systems is partly corroborated. The role of these health system characteristics is not specific for
Conclusions
Our study shows that countries vary in community orientation of GPs. In particular for policy it is important that we found relationships with having a list system, the employment status of GPs, using medical records to inform practice policies, a focus on prevention and multidisciplinary cooperation. We also found relations with the task environment. This suggests that community orientation can be influenced both by national policies and by policies of the practices themselves. New incentives
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Acknowledgements
This article is based on the QUALICOPC project, co- funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 242141.
The authors thank their partners in the QUALICOPC project; J. De Maeseneer, J. Detollenaere, L. Hanssens, S. Willems (Belgium); S. Greß, S. Heinemann (Germany); G. Capitani, S. De Rosis, A.M. Murante, S. Nuti, C. Seghieri, M. Vainieri (Italy); W. Boerma, D. Kringos, M. van den Berg, T. van Loenen (the Netherlands). In addition,
References (52)
- et al.
The policy and politics of the 2015 long-term care reform in the Netherlands
Health Policy
(2016) - et al.
Political, cultural and economic foundations of primary care in Europe
Social Science and Medicine
(2013) - et al.
Comparing health policy agendas across eleven high income countries: islands of difference in a sea of similarity
Health Policy
(2012) - et al.
Regional disparities in health care supply in eleven European countries: does politics matter?
Health Policy
(1999) Community oriented primary care: origins, evolution, applications
Social Science & Medicine
(1991)- et al.
Economic incentives and physicians’ delivery of preventive care: a systematic review
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
(2005) - et al.
Rural/urban differences in accounts of patients’ initial decisions to consult primary care
Health & Place
(2006) - et al.
Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world
Lancet
(2010) The European definition of general practice/ family medicine
(2011)- et al.
An alternative strategy in community health care: community-oriented primary health care
Israel Journal of Medical Sciences
(1983)
Challenges to primary care from co-and multi-morbidity
Primary Health Care Research & Development
Aging well and the environment: toward an integrative model and research agenda for the future
The Gerontologist
Ouderen van de toekomst. Verschillen in de wensen en mogelijkheden voor wonen, welzijn en zorg
Co-ordination and management of chronic conditions in Europe: the role of primary care – position paper of the European Forum for primary care
Quality in Primary Care
Towards people-centred health services delivery: a framework for action for the World Health Organisation (WHO) European region
International Journal of Integrated Care
From “patient” to “person” to “people”: the need for integrated, people-centered healthcare
International Journal of Person Centered Medicine
Community-oriented primary care
European Journal of General Practice
The regulatory environment of general practice: an international perspective
Motherhood, apple pie, and COPC
Annals of Family Medicine
Choices for change: the path for restructuring primary healthcare services in Canada
Service profiles of general practitioners in Europe. European GP task profile study
British Journal of General Practice
The ownership elephant: ownership and community-organizational structure in primary care
The New Zealand Medical Journal
Variations in preventive care utilisation in Europe
European Journal of Ageing
Integrated care for patients and populations: improving outcomes by working together
Staffing patterns of primary care practices in the comprehensive primary care initiative
Annals of Family Medicine
Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and access to health care
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Cited by (11)
“Top-Three” health reforms in 31 high-income countries in 2018 and 2019: an expert informed overview
2021, Health PolicyCitation Excerpt :Countries who are at the beginning of designing primary care reform or are considering reform could benefit immensely from this research. Available research on primary care reforms in individual countries, e.g., in Portugal [12] and the UK [3], or cross-country research on primary care workforce developments [32] or community-orientation of general practitioners [64] demonstrates the potential benefits of reporting and comparing similar developments in different countries. Third, our results seem to suggest that reforms targeting a more delineated health issue or narrowly scoped policy objective are more likely to be implemented quickly—or at all.
A people-centred health workforce in Europe: How to make it happen?
2018, Health PolicyPrimary care workforce development in Europe: An overview of health system responses and stakeholder views
2018, Health PolicyCitation Excerpt :This links the range of services GPs provide, and community orientation, to the available skill mix in primary care which is important in health workforce development. Community orientation of GPs varies between countries with a stronger orientation evident in the Netherlands, Norway and Turkey, and weaker orientation in countries such as Luxemburg, Cyprus and Estonia [84,85]. Primary care practices in twelve of the participating countries have a median number of one extra primary care profession apart from one or more GPs and in Belgium half of the practices only consist of a GP without support.
The Organization of Outreach Work for Vulnerable Patients in General Practice during COVID-19: Results from the Cross-Sectional PRICOV-19 Study in 38 Countries
2023, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health