Elsevier

Health Policy

Volume 86, Issues 2–3, May 2008, Pages 295-307
Health Policy

Collaboration between practice, policy and research in local public health in the Netherlands

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.11.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

The collaboration between policy, practice, and research in local public health was studied in a multiple case study. The assumption is that collaboration will result in more solid evidence and higher quality standards in public health.

Methods

First, collaboration barriers were studied by analysing the work cycles of the three domains, which are considered to operate as niches. Actors at the administrative, institutional, and individual levels were identified. Theories that describe processes of the convergence of the three niches through practical strategies were sought. Finally, the application of the practical strategies in six cases was evaluated.

Results

When administrative, institutional, and individual changes develop in a similar fashion and in parallel with each other, the likelihood of successful collaboration that goes beyond the initial period is greater. The findings suggest that organisational development (OD) strategies that address collaboration at the institutional level make a relatively strong contribution.

Conclusions

Top level consultations just after local elections, investments in OD strategies and a new kind of accountability in public health are recommended. The assumption that successful collaboration contributes to enhanced effectiveness, efficiency, and efficacy of public health could not yet be unequivocally confirmed.

Introduction

Public health includes: (i) policy, as it is inherently a political enterprise; (ii) practice, as policies need to be implemented to create social action and to organise service delivery; and (iii) research, to assess the prevalence and determinants of health problems and the effectiveness of activities. Ideally, policy, practice and research should be collaborative and mutual dependent partners to strengthen public health and to increase its evidence base. Evidence surrounding public health actions inevitably raises ethical, technical, practical, political, organisational, and economic issues, making the evidence extremely complex [1], [2], [3], [4]. The assumption that long-lasting collaboration between practice, research, and policy will result in more solid evidence and higher quality standards in public health is widely supported [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. History indicates that a link between research, practice, and policy is difficult to establish. Even today, concerted actions by public health policy, practice, and research are still rare.

Given this background, our research question was: which barriers prevent the collaborative development of public health practice, policy, and research and how can the gaps between these fields be bridged? We defined successful collaboration as concerted action continued beyond the initial funding period of usually four years. Continuation after the extra funding has stopped requires intrinsic motivation on the part of the partners, rather than external obligation. We studied the practical strategies1 of collaboration cases concerning six different local public health problems. Practical strategies are defined here as specific techniques to develop sustainable collaboration based on theoretical methods in ways that fit the population and the context. The term practical strategy relates to the question ‘how to do’, or in other words, ‘how did we promote collaboration’ ([21], pp. 318–320). We restricted our study to collaboration processes at the local level, namely the collaboration between local government of Maastricht and surrounding villages, their Regional Public Health Service (GGD), and University Maastricht. This article describes why sustained collaboration was successfully achieved in three of these cases, but not in three others. The article also elaborates on whether sustained collaboration leads to more solid evidence about public health activities. It therefore contributes to the development of collaboration strategies between the component areas of public health [22].

Section snippets

Methods

To answer the research question, we used a multiple case study design. The six cases were intended collaborations between 1991 and 2005 covering the domains of policy, practice, and research. Together, these cases are representative examples of public health problems and offer clear illustrations of public health problems in general (see Box 1). Before analysing the cases, we took four preparatory steps to define practical strategies so that we could explain the absence or presence of success.

Results

The results are summarised in Table 3. In terms of success, three of the six projects achieved sustained collaboration beyond the initial funding period. The successful cases, namely hepatitis B, Schoolbeat, and Heartbeat, had much higher total scores (35, 53, and 54, respectively; maximum score = 60) than the unsuccessful cases (24, 10 and 25). Therefore, we tentatively suggest a cut-off point for success between 25 and 35 (around 50% score), and a successful project appeared to require the

Discussion

We assessed the cases by assigning quantitative scores to the application of strategies. Merely assigning plus or minus scores to practical strategies is not likely to produce suggestions for their application in other public health cases. The use of strategies needs to be considered from the perspective of the particular context, historical roots, dynamics, and unique persons. The application of a strategy in one case might be contra-productive in another. For example, at the start of the

Conclusion

We conclude that, when administrative, institutional, and individual changes are tuned to each other successful collaboration beyond the initial period is more likely. Coherence between the system levels of the three niches is therefore necessary. Coherence is defined as vertical communication between the actors of the system levels, and horizontal communication between the actors of policy, practice, and research at each system level and sometimes across the system levels. Coherence between

References (43)

  • P. Davis

    Problems, politics and processes: public health sciences and policy in developed countries

  • L. Dusenbury et al.

    Pursuing the course from research to practice

    Prevention Science

    (2004)
  • J.D. Kimbrell et al.

    The Louisiana Public Health Institute: a cross-sector approach for improving the public's health

    Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

    (2002)
  • J.P. Mackenbach

    Sociale geneeskunde en ‘public health’: historische kanttekeningen bij de Nederlandse situatie

    Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen

    (2003)
  • D. Nutbeam et al.

    ‘evidence’ into public health policy, and ‘policy’ into public health research

    Tijdschrift Gezondheidswetenschappen

    (2003)
  • W. Reijmerink et al.

    Haal meer uit kennis! Synthese van een veranderingstraject

    Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen

    (2005)
  • C. Spreeuwenberg

    ‘Knowledge Infrastructure for Public Health’: an advisory report from the Advisory Council on Health Research

    Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

    (2003)
  • F. Sturmans

    [The Regional Public Health service as an Academic Collaborative Centre for Public Health]. De GGD als academische werkplaats voor de maatschappelijke gezondheidszorg

    Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen

    (1999)
  • Wellcome Trust. Public health sciences: challenges and opportunities. United Kingdom, Public Health Science Working...
  • R. Bal et al.

    Paradox van wetenschappelijk gezag. Over de maatschappelijke invloed van adviezen van de gezondheidsraad

    Den Haag, Gezondheidsraad

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text