Elsevier

Health & Place

Volume 23, September 2013, Pages 63-69
Health & Place

Depression, neighborhood deprivation and risk of type 2 diabetes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.05.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Neighborhood characteristics have been associated with both depression and diabetes, but to date little attention has been paid to whether the association between depression and diabetes varies across different types of neighborhoods. This prospective study examined the relationship between depression, neighborhood deprivation, and risk of type 2 diabetes among 336,340 adults from a national-representative sample of primary care centers in Sweden (2001–2007). Multi-level logistic regression models were used to assess associations between depression and risk of type 2 diabetes across affluent and deprived neighborhoods. After accounting for demographic, individual-level socioeconomic, and health characteristics, depression was significantly associated with risk of diabetes (odds ratio (OR): 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06–1.14), as was neighborhood deprivation (OR for high vs. low deprivation: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.22–1.34). The interaction term between depression and neighborhood deprivation was non-significant, indicating that the relationship between depression and diabetes risk is similar across levels of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation.

Introduction

Major depression and type 2 diabetes mellitus are the first and eighth leading causes of disability-adjusted life years lost among high-income countries, and are projected to be in the top ten causes of disability-adjusted life years lost worldwide by 2030 (World Health Organization, 2008). A key characteristic of depression in mid- and late-life is comorbidity with medical illness (Katz, 1996). Epidemiologic and clinical studies have established that depression often co-occurs with type 2 diabetes (Katon, 2008), and it is now acknowledged that this relationship is likely bi-directional (Pan et al., 2011, Pan et al., 2010, Campayo et al., 2010, Frasure-Smith et al., 2000, Mezuk et al., 2008a, Golden et al., 2008). Depression is associated with both risk of type 2 diabetes (Mezuk et al., 2008a), and poor clinical prognosis among those with diabetes (Pan et al., 2011, Lin et al., 2009, de Groot et al., 2001). However, research to date has not extensively examined whether depression may interact with other risk factors for type 2 diabetes, in particular contextual environmental characteristics.

There is a growing appreciation of the role that contextual environmental factors (e.g., “neighborhood” factors) have on mental and physical health (Shih et al., 2011, Dubowitz et al., 2011, Kim, 2008, Xue et al., 2005, Kershaw et al., 2011). Neighborhoods have both physical and social attributes that may influence health. Physical attributes include access to goods and services, greenspace, and availability of alcohol and tobacco outlets; social attributes include community unemployment, segregation, social capital, civic participation, and crime (Diez Roux and Mair, 2010). Because place of residence is strongly patterned by social position, neighborhood characteristics may be important contributors to health disparities (Diez Roux and Mair, 2010). Contextual environmental factors may influence mental and physical health by placing constraints on (or promoting) health-related behaviors (e.g., smoking, alcohol use, diet, physical activity), or through acting as a source of (or buffer against) stressors (Diez Roux and Mair, 2010). A handful of studies have prospectively examined contextual environmental characteristics and risk of depression or type 2 diabetes, with mixed results (Kim, 2008, Diez Roux and Mair, 2010). Lofors and Sundquist (2007) reported that high neighborhood deprivation was associated with 20% increased risk of in-patient hospitalization for major depression relative to more affluent neighborhoods (Lofors and Sundquist, 2007), and Crump et al. (2011) reported that individuals in high deprivation neighborhoods were 15% more likely to be prescribed antidepressants than those in affluent neighborhoods. Galea et al. (2007) reported that individuals living in the poorest neighborhoods had twice the risk of major depression relative to affluent neighborhoods (Galea et al., 2007). However, other reports have not found a significant association between the contextual environment and risk of major depression or elevated depressive symptoms (Yen and Kaplan, 1999, Schootman et al., 2007a, Wight et al., 2009) Regarding diabetes, Auchincloss et al. (2008) found that living in a neighborhood with better resources for physical activity and healthy foods was associated with lower prevalence of insulin resistance, and a 38% lower incidence of type 2 diabetes (Auchincloss et al., 2009). Other characteristics of the built environment, such as housing quality, have also been associated with risk of type 2 diabetes (Schootman et al., 2007b, Cox et al., 2007). Neighborhood deprivation and attributes of the physical environment have also been positively associated with conditions related to diabetes, particularly obesity (Mujahid et al., 2008).

Despite the epidemiologic evidence supporting major depression and depressive symptoms as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes, and the apparent association between neighborhood characteristics and these health conditions, thus far no studies have examined whether neighborhood context modifies the association between depression and risk of type 2 diabetes. Two studies have examined whether the relationship between depression and diabetes varies by individual-level indicators of socioeconomic status (Mezuk et al., 2008b, Carnethon et al., 2003), and both found that the risk of type 2 diabetes associated with depression was greatest among those with the lowest educational attainment. Not only are individuals with low educational attainment more likely to experience depression (Lorant et al., 2003), they may be less likely to have positive resources (socially or financially) to cope with a depressive episode when it occurs (Krueger and Chang, 2008). Because of their lower socioeconomic status, individuals with depression may also be more likely to live in and be exposed to environmental contexts that increase diabetes risk, such as high concentration of fast food restaurants, alcohol outlets, and tobacco shops. These contexts simultaneously promote opportunities to engage in unhealthy stress-coping behaviors (e.g., diets high in fats and sugar, smoking) and limit opportunities to engage in healthy behaviors that reduce diabetes risk through limited access to healthy foods and outdoor recreational activities (Auchincloss et al., 2008, Auchincloss et al., 2009). Over time, this may lead to an accumulation of poor health outcomes associated with depression among persons living in socially disadvantaged communities.

The aims of this study are to: (a) determine the prospective relationship between major depression, neighborhood deprivation, and type 2 diabetes, and (b) evaluate whether the relationship between major depression and risk of type 2 diabetes is moderated by contextual environmental characteristics.

Section snippets

Sample

Data used in this study were retrieved from a research database, located at the Center for Primary Health Care Research at Lund University in Malmö Sweden (Lofors and Sundquist, 2007, Sundquist et al., 2011, Sundquist et al., 1999). Complete medical record data were obtained from a nationally representative sample of 75 primary healthcare centers beginning in January 1, 2001. These records were then linked to national inpatient (available from 1964), outpatient (available from 2001), and

Results

Among 336,340 adults aged 30 and older who did not have diabetes at baseline, there were 27,894 incident cases of type 2 diabetes over the 7 year follow-up period, which corresponds to a cumulative incidence of 8.2% (Table 1). The majority (N=19,942, 71.5%) of diabetes cases were detected in primary care or by use of anti-diabetic medications rather than in inpatient or outpatient settings. Type 2 diabetes risk was positively associated with level of neighborhood deprivation, with

Discussion

The primary finding from this study is that the major depression is associated with a modest increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, and that this relationship is not moderated by neighborhood-level deprivation. Even in low deprivation areas, depression was associated with increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes over the 7-year follow-up period; this elevated risk was similar across all levels of neighborhood SES. Although there was no evidence that the effect of depression on

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the grants from the National Institutes of Health (DK8356430 and MH093642), the Swedish Research Council, and ALF project grant, Lund, Sweden. The funding agencies had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The researchers were independent of the funding agencies.

References (54)

  • A.H. Auchincloss et al.

    Neighborhood resources of physical activity and healthy foods and their association with insulin resistance

    Epidemiology

    (2008)
  • A.S. Bryk et al.

    Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods

    (1992)
  • P.W. Callas et al.

    Empirical comparisons of proportional hazards, Poisson, and logistic regression modeling of occupational cohort data

    AmericanJournal of Indian Medicine

    (1998)
  • A. Campayo et al.

    Depressive disorder and incident diabetes mellitus: the effect of characteristics of depression

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • M. Carnethon et al.

    Symptoms of depression as a risk factor for incident diabetes: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Epidemiologic Follow-up Study, 1971–1992

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    (2003)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2011. National Diabetes Factsheet: General information and national...
  • M. de Groot et al.

    Association of depression and diabetes complications: a meta-analysis

    Psychosomatic Medicine

    (2001)
  • A.V. Diez Roux et al.

    Neighborhoods and health

    Annals of the New York Academy of Medicine

    (2010)
  • T. Dubowitz et al.

    The Women’s health initiative: the food environment, neighborhood socioeconomic status, bmi, and blood pressure

    Obesity

    (2011)
  • N. Frasure-Smith et al.

    Social support, depression, and mortality during the first year after myocardial infarction

    Circulation

    (2000)
  • T. Gary Webb et al.

    Neighborhood socioeconomic status, depression, and health status in the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) study

    BMC Public Health

    (2011)
  • M.S. Gilthorpe

    The importance of normalisation in the construction of deprivation indices

    Journal of Epidemiol Community Health

    (1995)
  • R.J. Glynn et al.

    Indications for propensity scores and review of their use in pharmacoepidemiology

    Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology

    (2006)
  • S.H. Golden et al.

    Examining a bidirectional association between depressive symptoms and diabetes

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (2008)
  • A. Grimsmo et al.

    Patients, diagnoses and processes in general practice in the Nordic countries. an attempt to make data from computerised medical records available for comparable statistics

    Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

    (2001)
  • J.S. Harman et al.

    Primary care physician office visits for depression by older Americans

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    (2006)
  • H. Inskip et al.

    Methods for age-adjustment of rates

    Statistics in Medicine

    (1983)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Measures of depression and risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      The primary goal of this review was to determine whether the association between depression and new-onset type 2 diabetes differs by measure of depression. Risk ratios for different measures of depression ranged from an 11% increased risk of diabetes (95% CI 1.07–1.15) in one study that assessed physician-diagnosed depression to a 65% increased risk (95% CI 1.02–2.66) in one study that used a standardized diagnostic interview (Mezuk et al., 2013, Campayo et al., 2010). The two most common measures of depression, depressive symptom scales and antidepressant use, were associated with a 17% increased risk (95% CI 1.10–1.25) and a 33% increased risk (95% CI 1.15–1.52) of type 2 diabetes, respectively.

    • Is familial risk for depression confounded by individual and familial socioeconomic factors and neighborhood environmental factors? A 7-year follow-up study in Sweden

      2018, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The study population comprised 80,072 men and 108,835 women from a nationwide sample of primary care centers in Sweden. The data used in this study were retrieved from national registers (Mezuk et al., 2013; Sundquist et al., 2011). Complete medical records were obtained from a nationally representative sample of 75 primary healthcare centers beginning on January 1, 2001.

    • Non-communicable disease syndemics: poverty, depression, and diabetes among low-income populations

      2017, The Lancet
      Citation Excerpt :

      Evidence dating back to 199317 and 200118 shows that the two conditions maintain a bidirectional relationship,19–21 by which diabetes contributes to depression22 and depression in those with diabetes is associated with non-adherence to diabetes treatment,16,23 increased diabetes complications,24 and poor glycaemic control.25 Depression and diabetes also share biological origins,21,26–28 particularly the activation of innate immunity that leads to a cytokine-mediated inflammatory response, alterations in glucose transport, and potentially through dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis,27,29 as well as behavioural patterns, including consumption of high-caloric foods, low engagement in physical activity, and use of antidepressants that enhance weight gain,20 and social factors that promote stress, eating, and reduced physical activity.19 Moreover, there is ongoing debate about the role of antidepressants increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes, with diverse causal pathways that require further research.29–31

    • Long-term effects of neighbourhood deprivation on diabetes risk: Quasi-experimental evidence from a refugee dispersal policy in Sweden

      2016, The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
      Citation Excerpt :

      After excluding areas with fewer than 50 residents because of unstable statistical estimates, our analysis included individuals who were initially assigned to 4833 different SAMS. We created a summary measure to characterise neighbourhood deprivation in 1987, following the approach adopted by previous Swedish studies.3,28 Specifically, we used a principal components analysis that included four variables for all residents aged 25–64 years in each SAMS, each measured in percentages in the year of initial placement: low education status (<10 years of formal schooling), low income (<50% of individual median income from all sources), unemployment (not employed [excluding full-time students, military, and retirees]), and social welfare assistance.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text