Elsevier

General Hospital Psychiatry

Volume 26, Issue 1, January–February 2004, Pages 18-23
General Hospital Psychiatry

Original article
Psychiatric comorbidity and inpatient treatment history in bulimic subjects

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2003.07.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Bulimia nervosa (BN) is often associated with other forms of psychopathology. There is a need to clarify which specific factors of psychopathology are linked with the referral to psychiatric or psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment. This study examined which factors of psychopathology are linked with the referral of BN patients to inpatient treatment while controlling for history of suicide attempts and history of underweight. 126 females with a current diagnosis of BN purging type were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and interviewed about their history of treatment for the BN, history of weight, and history of suicide attempts. Logistic regressions were conducted to examine whether psychiatric comorbidity, suicide attempts, and underweight were associated with inpatient treatment history. Axis I comorbidity in general, but no specific axis I disorder, was associated with inpatient history. Axes II comorbidity, especially Cluster B disorders and to a lesser degree depressive/negativistic personality disorders, was associated with a history of inpatient treatment. History of suicide attempts was also linked with inpatient experience, but history of underweight was not. The results showed that BN patients with specific types of comorbidity are more likely to be hospitalized than others.

Introduction

Bulimia nervosa (BN) is the most prevalent of eating disorders, affecting between 1% and 3% of adolescent and young adult women [1]. Clinical experience and research indicates that BN patients often present a complex psychopathological picture with high levels of psychiatric comorbidity both on axes I and II [2], [3]. When determining what type of treatment to offer, clinicians consider how the disorder has affected the patient's social integration and ability to work, previous failed attempts of therapy, and the severity of the patient's disorder, of which one aspect is presence and type of comorbidity. Thus, persons attending more intense treatment settings, such as psychiatric or psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment facilities, tend to have higher levels of psychopathology. To this end, it has been shown that eating disorder inpatients have higher levels of anxiety, depression, and somatization [4], and higher rates of personality disorders [5], [6] than outpatients. The existing research investigating differences of psychopathology between inpatient and noninpatient eating disorder samples has not employed systematic assessments of psychiatric comorbidity. In addition, while findings of differences in levels of psychopathology have been reported, the significance of the type of comorbidity for referral of BN patients to inpatient treatment has not previously been systematically examined. Identifying the specific psychopathological characteristics that are associated with psychiatric or psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment would help to better understand referral processes, and help in tailoring appropriate treatment programs or support existing standards of care in the treatment of BN.

This study was designed to examine which specific types of psychopathology are found in BN subjects with inpatient experience as compared to BN subjects without such experience. Assessing the whole range of axes I and II comorbidity made it possible to examine specific types of comorbidity for links with inpatient experience while controlling for other forms of psychopathology. Deliberate self-harming behavior, such as suicide attempts [7] and severe underweight [8], are considered indications for hospitalization of eating disorder patients. Because suicidality or starvation behavior may be confounded with axes I or II comorbidity, past suicidal behavior or episodes of underweight are factors that ought to be controlled when examining psychopathological characteristics for associations with psychiatric or psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment.

In the existing literature it is customary to classify subjects based on their current treatment referral status (i.e., inpatient, outpatient, nonpatient). The current referral status, however, is transitory. As a consequence, clinical outpatient samples frequently include cases with past hospitalizations [2], [9]. To classify subjects into groups that are homogenous with regard to treatment experience, in this study each person's entire treatment history was taken into account when determining her status as an ‘inpatient’ or a person without inpatient experience.

Section snippets

Participants

The participants were recruited during a period of 24 months (March 1997 until March 1999). In total, 300 participants with a current DSM-IV diagnosis of eating disorder, a minimum age of 17 years, and adequate ability to speak German were enrolled. For the analyses presented here, only females with a current DSM-IV [1] diagnosis of bulimia nervosa of the binge-purging type were considered (N = 144). Of the 144 bulimic females, 29 were recruited from the Eating Disorder Inpatient Unit of the

Results

More than one-half (57.1%, N = 72) of the participants had both at least one lifetime axis I disorder in addition to the ED and at least one personality disorder. Twenty-two women (17.5%) had axis I comorbidity but no personality disorder, and 14 (11.1%) had a personality disorder but, aside from their ED, no other axis I disorders. Only 18 participants (14.3%) had a pure ED, i.e., no psychiatric comorbidity. Table 1 shows how comorbidity, history of attempted suicide and of underweight were

Discussion

This study examined which specific factors of psychopathology distinguish BN purge subjects with a history of inpatient treatment from those without such a history. Levels of psychiatric comorbidity in BN subjects is often high and multifaceted (i.e., several comorbid disorders may exist). The comprehensive assessment of axes I and II comorbidity permitted to examine associations between specific disorders and the experience of inpatient treatment, while controlling for other types of

Acknowledgements

This research was sponsored by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant number: 23-51968.97; G. Milos), and by the Federal Department for Education and Science (European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research—COST Action B6; G. Milos), Bern.

References (24)

  • D.B. Herzog et al.

    Comorbidity and outcome in eating disorders

    Psychiatr Clin North Am

    (1996)
  • J.H. White et al.

    A comparison of inpatient and outpatient women with eating disorders

    Arch Psychiatr Nurs

    (1998)
  • G.T. Wilson et al.

    Cognitive-behavioral treatment of bulimia nervosaa controlled evaluation

    Behav Res Ther

    (1986)
  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1994)
  • Milos G, Spindler A, Buddeberg C, Crameri A. Axes I & II comorbidity and treatment experiences in eating disorder...
  • J.H. Rosenvinge et al.

    The comorbidity of eating disorders and personality disordersa meta- analytic review of studies published between 1983 and 1998

    Eat Weight Disord

    (2000)
  • A.E. Skodol et al.

    Comorbidity of DSM-III-R eating disorders and personality disorders

    Int J Eat Disord

    (1993)
  • C. Fairburn et al.

    Cognitive-behavioral therapy for binge eating and bulimia nervosa

  • Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with eating disorders (revision)

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2000)
  • D. Westen et al.

    Personality profiles in eating disordersrethinking the distinction between axis I and axis II

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • H.U. Wittchen et al.

    SCID Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV, Achse I und II

    (1997)
  • COST Action B6. Psychotherapeutic treatment of eating disorders. Final evaluation report. Luxembourg: Office for...
  • Cited by (16)

    • Psychiatric comorbidity in women and men with eating disorders results from a large clinical database

      2015, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      All interviewers were trained to use the Stepwise system and the interviews, but there may be some variability in assessments, and inter-rater agreement estimates were not possible. Speaking against this objection, results were largely consistent with previous comorbidity estimates for ED (Blinder et al., 2006; Buhren et al., 2014; Grilo et al., 2013; Herzog et al., 1992; Hudson et al., 2007; Kaye et al., 2004; Milos et al., 2004; Spindler and Milos, 2004; Zaider et al., 2000). Another limitation in this study is that the sample comes from a treatment-seeking patient group.

    • The relationship of bulimia and anorexia nervosa with bipolar disorder and its temperamental foundations

      2009, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Impulsivity and compulsivity play an important role in both ED and BP. Behavioural activation has been described as one of the central factors in mania (Akiskal et al., 2003), whereas impulsivity is a feature in a lot of psychiatric disorders such as alcohol and substance abuse and attention-deficit-hyperactive disorders commonly found comorbid with BP (Kessler et al., 1994;Joyce et al., 2004), as well as among the eating disorders, especially in relation to BN (Garfinkel et al., 1995; Spindler and Milos, 2004; Jordan et al., 2003; Jordan et al., 2008). In this paper we confirm earlier findings that there is a close connection between bulimia nervosa and bipolarity (MacQueen et al., 2003; McElroy et al., 2005; Perugi et al., 2006).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text