Why genetic investigation of psychiatric disorders is so difficult

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2004.04.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Genetic investigations of psychiatric disease have historically relied on subjectively assessed disease diagnoses to define phenotypes. Recent developments in several areas have provided various new approaches to behavioral disorder phenotyping that promise to advance our understanding of the genetic and environmental etiologies of these traits. Such developments include re-evaluation of the boundaries between different psychiatric categories, implementation of quantitative neurobiological assessments that may serve as endophenotypes, generation of increasingly sophisticated animal behavioral models, and investigation of explicit environmental covariates. At the same time, movement toward large-scale, collaborative efforts is increasing the effectiveness of traditional genetic mapping approaches.

Introduction

There is a widespread perception that elucidating the genetic basis of psychiatric diseases may be more difficult than for other types of common disorders. This perception has two roots. First, during the 20th Century, psychiatry went through a long estrangement from medical science, and there may be a residual suspicion that psychiatric phenotypes are not as ‘real’ as phenotypes investigated in other medical specialties. Second, and related to the first point, psychiatric phenotypes have rested on subjective clinical evaluation and criteria, with no biological markers. Psychiatric genetic investigations have focused mainly on obvious combinations of phenotypic features, in the form of disease diagnoses [1]. Whereas some investigators focus on narrowly defined disease phenotypes, to avoid confounds related to heterogeneity, others argue that we may miss important information and decrease statistical power by attenuating a broader spectrum.

In reviewing the state of psychiatric genetics, we here focus on new developments in behavioral trait phenotyping. We note recent progress in several areas: re-evaluations of the boundaries between different psychiatric categories, the explosion of interest in endophenotypes, the development of animal models for phenotypic features related to human diseases, and the investigation of phenotypes with explicit environmental covariates.

Section snippets

Genetic epidemiology

Genetic epidemiologic studies conducted over most of the 20th Century helped establish the disease categories universally employed in psychiatry. The discovery that, as categorized, psychiatric disorders were highly heritable suggested the feasibility of mapping genes contributing to their susceptibility. Recent epidemiologic studies have deconstructed these diagnostic categories, but it is not yet known whether the variable symptoms and subtypes described represent biological variants of a

Endophenotypes

The identification of intermediate phenotypes (endophenotypes), which may have a simpler genetic architecture than disease diagnoses, could enhance the power of mapping studies of psychiatric disorders, and may also help resolve difficulties in defining the boundaries of spectrum disorders in relatives of affected probands. A major issue in applying endophenotypes to gene mapping is that heritability has not yet been established for many such features. Brain morphometric features are potential

Animal models

The pace of efforts to develop animal genetic models for psychiatric disorders is accelerating; in part this is due to technological developments that make it possible to generate more precise models (e.g. conditional knockouts, in which loss of expression of a gene is limited to a particular brain region). Human psychiatric phenotypes are assessed primarily via clinical interview or subjective report: as such, they are impossible to reproduce in mice. Therefore, these models are intrinsically

Genetic mapping of behavioral traits

The intriguing results of several recent association and linkage studies of psychiatric disorders have been interpreted by some observers as substantial milestones: for example, the news and editorial staff of Science voted the ‘decoding’ of mental illness as the second most important scientific breakthrough of 2003 [26]. Some caution, however, is warranted with respect to the interpretation of such findings, many of which have either failed to meet rigorous standards for statistical

Gene–environment interactions and association studies

Most observers assume that understanding human behavior requires consideration of nurture as well as nature; one benefit of association studies in population samples is that such samples are suitable for examining gene–environment interactions. Caspi et al. [28] conducted an association analysis between MDD and a single promoter polymorphism in the serotonin transporter. Numerous studies have tested for such an association, with equivocal results [29]. This study differs from the others in two

Linkage studies

Recent linkage studies of major psychiatric disorders have attempted various strategies to compensate for uncertainties regarding clinical phenotypes. There is a trend towards accruing larger samples, to ‘overpower’ complexity. For example, a recent report [31] identified significant evidence for a gender-specific locus for MDD, a notoriously heterogeneous trait, on chromosome 12q, using a sample of 1,890 individuals from 110 Utah pedigrees. Other studies have attempted to combine samples from

Candidate genes identified by mapping studies

Success in identifying prospective disease genes has been most apparent in mapping studies of SZ; efforts are underway to understand the expression and physiologic function of the identified candidates. The identification of G72 as a risk factor for SZ, for example, has led to investigation of an associated enzyme, D-amino-acid oxidase, and to speculation that these genes may both contribute to SZ risk via pathology in the NMDA receptor pathway [38]. This same locus (13q 33) has also been

Conclusions

The studies reviewed here reiterate the fact that decades of research have not established the biological validity of current psychiatric diagnostic categories. Nevertheless, there is cause for increased optimism that we may soon identify genetic variants associated with particular behavioral phenotypic features. These recent investigations indicate a variety of promising developments including the accumulation of large, and therefore powerful, study samples, the application of new phenotyping

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • of special interest

  • ••

    of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01 MH49499, R01 NS37484, R01 NS40042 and 2K02 MH01375.

References (55)

  • R.E Straub et al.

    Genetic variation in the 6p22.3 gene DTNBP1, the human ortholog of the mouse dysbindin gene, is associated with schizophrenia

    Am J Hum Genet

    (2002)
  • H Liu et al.

    Genetic variation in the 22q11 locus and susceptibility to schizophrenia

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2002)
  • E Tunbridge et al.

    Catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) and proline dehydrogenase (PRODH) mRNAs in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression

    Synapse

    (2004)
  • M.L Mimmack et al.

    Gene expression analysis in schizophrenia: reproducible up-regulation of several members of the apolipoprotein L family located in a high-susceptibility locus for schizophrenia on chromosome 22

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2002)
  • T.M Maynard et al.

    A comprehensive analysis of 22q11 gene expression in the developing and adult brain

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2003)
  • T.L Gasperoni et al.

    Genetic linkage and association between chromosome 1q and working memory function in schizophrenia

    Am J Med Genet

    (2003)
  • N Freimer et al.

    The human phenome project

    Nat Genet

    (2003)
  • E Sibille et al.

    Gene expression profiling of depression and suicide in human prefrontal cortex

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2004)
  • S.R Jaffee et al.

    Differences in early childhood risk factors for juvenile-onset and adult-onset depression

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • P Tienari et al.

    Genetic boundaries of the schizophrenia spectrum: evidence from the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • F Schurhoff et al.

    Familial aggregation of delusional proneness in schizophrenia and bipolar pedigrees

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • A.G Cardno et al.

    A twin study of genetic relationships between psychotic symptoms

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • K.S Kendler

    Hierarchy and heritability: the role of diagnosis and modeling in psychiatric genetics

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • K.S Kendler et al.

    The Roscommon Family Study. IV. Affective illness, anxiety disorders, and alcoholism in relatives

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1993)
  • P McGuffin et al.

    The heritability of bipolar affective disorder and the genetic relationship to unipolar depression

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • P.F Sullivan et al.

    Schizophrenia as a complex trait: evidence from a meta-analysis of twin studies

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • K.S Kendler et al.

    The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for common psychiatric and substance use disorders in men and women

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Neurobiological candidate endophenotypes of social anxiety disorder

      2016, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thereby, the genes underlying the vulnerability for SAD are until now largely unknown. The search for SAD genes is complicated by the heterogeneity of the disorder and the fact that the diagnosis is based on clinical assessments and not on biologically-based measurements (Bearden et al., 2004; Glahn et al., 2007; Gottesman and Gould, 2003). In addition, SAD is a polygenic disorder: multiple genetic variants, each with a relatively small effect, interact and lead to disease vulnerability (Binder, 2012; Domschke and Dannlowski, 2010; Fox and Kalin, 2014).

    • Adolescent methylphenidate treatment differentially alters adult impulsivity and hyperactivity in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat model of ADHD

      2016, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a neurobehavioral disorder affecting 12% of children and 5% of adults (Biederman et al., 2010), is characterized by increased impulsivity, hyperactivity and inattention (Bearden et al., 2004; Castellanos et al., 2005; American Psychiatric Association., 2013).

    • Sexual Dimorphisms in Psychosis Risk: A Neurodevelopmental Perspective

      2015, Sex Differences in the Central Nervous System
    • Genetic influence on the working memory circuitry: Behavior, structure, function and extensions to illness

      2011, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Histologically, this model shows evidence of impaired development of dendrites, dendritic spines, and excitatory synapses in the hippocampus [79], as well as abnormal transcription of proteins related to synapse formation in prefrontal and hippocampal tissue [80]. These mice also display deficits in spatial WMem performance [81], much like patients with 22qDS do [71]. Critically, Sigurdsson et al. [81] recently demonstrated that these behavioral WMem impairments are associated with abnormal, long-range synchronization in a fronto-temporal learning and memory circuit.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text