Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 58, October 2017, Pages 310-318
Gait & Posture

Review
Associations of prolonged standing with musculoskeletal symptoms—A systematic review of laboratory studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.024Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Evidence on musculoskeletal symptoms during prolonged standing was reviewed.

  • We found associations of standing with low back and lower extremity symptoms.

  • Awkward postures and lower limb blood pooling may underlie this association.

  • We recommend to refrain from standing >40 min to avoid symptoms development.

  • Interventions should reduce standing time and should address underlying mechanisms.

Abstract

While prolonged standing has shown to be detrimentally associated with musculoskeletal symptoms, exposure limits and underlying mechanisms are not well understood. We systematically reviewed evidence from laboratory studies on musculoskeletal symptom development during prolonged (≥20 min) uninterrupted standing, quantified acute dose-response associations and described underlying mechanisms.

Peer-reviewed articles were systematically searched for. Data from included articles were tabulated, and dose-response associations were statistically pooled. A linear interpolation of pooled dose-response associations was performed to estimate the duration of prolonged standing associated with musculoskeletal symptoms with a clinically relevant intensity of ≥9 (out of 100).

We included 26 articles (from 25 studies with 591 participants), of which the majority examined associations of prolonged standing with low back and lower extremity symptoms. Evidence on other (e.g., upper limb) symptoms was limited and inconsistent. Pooled dose-response associations showed that clinically relevant levels of low back symptoms were reached after 71 min of prolonged standing, with this shortened to 42 min in those considered pain developers. Regarding standing-related low back symptoms, consistent evidence was found for postural mechanisms (i.e., trunk flexion and lumbar curvature), but not for mechanisms of muscle fatigue and/or variation in movement. Blood pooling was the most consistently reported mechanism for standing-related lower extremity symptoms.

Evidence suggests a detrimental association of prolonged standing with low back and lower extremity symptoms. To avoid musculoskeletal symptoms (without having a-priori knowledge on whether someone will develop symptoms or not), dose-response evidence from this study suggests a recommendation to refrain from standing for prolonged periods >40 min. Interventions should also focus on underlying pain mechanisms.

Introduction

Prolonged periods of standing are traditionally common in certain occupations, including in retail, food, healthcare, education, and manufacturing industries. It has been shown that 62% of a sample from the general Australian working population reported their work involved standing [1]; which is consistent with findings from a study in a Canadian working population [2].

A growing body of evidence suggests that prolonged sitting is associated with several adverse health outcomes [3], [4], [5]. Consequently, expert recommendations advise workers to replace periods of sitting at work with standing and other light activities such as walking [6]. There is a growing interest in workplaces implementing this advice [7], most notably through the introduction of sit/stand office workstations [8]. However, these alternatives to sitting, such as standing, may expose workers to other health consequences [9].

Adverse health outcomes of standing have been previously reported [10], and include lower extremity venous disorders [11], [12], perinatal health complications (such as preterm delivery and pre-eclampsia) [13] and musculoskeletal symptoms (e.g. self-reported pain, discomfort or complaints in any region of the musculoskeletal system). In a recent systematic review on epidemiological evidence, it was identified (albeit from limited high quality evidence from longitudinal studies) that occupational standing was detrimentally associated with low back symptoms [14]. Evidence regarding the association of excessive standing and lower extremity symptoms was inconclusive, while of the limited evidence with upper extremity symptoms, a significant association did not seem to be evident.

One key issue inadequately addressed to date is the dosage of prolonged standing that may induce musculoskeletal symptoms. The prolonged standing strain index developed by Halim and Omar [15], which was based on a review of (scientific and professional) occupational health literature and expert (e.g., ergonomic practitioners, medical doctors and physiotherapists) opinions, states that ≤1 h of continuous standing can be considered safe, >1 h of continuous standing is slightly unsafe and >1 h of continuous standing in combination with >4 h of standing per day as unsafe. The scientific basis of these exposure limits was, however, unclear as a systematic review of evidence on dose-response associations has not been undertaken.

Apart from the lack of understanding about exposure limits, underlying mechanisms explaining the associations of prolonged standing with musculoskeletal symptoms have not been elucidated. Such knowledge is needed for the development of interventions targeted at preventing detrimental effects of prolonged standing. Previous work has suggested mechanisms of muscle fatigue [16], static postures and lack of variation in movement [17], [18] to be possible contributors to standing-related low back symptoms. It has also been suggested that there may be different subgroups of people that do and do not develop low back symptoms during periods of prolonged standing [19], [20], [21]; often referred to as ‘pain developers’ and ‘non-pain developers’, respectively. However, factors that distinguish pain developers from non-pain developers are not well understood yet. For the association of standing and lower limb symptoms, mechanisms of muscle fatigue [22] and mechanisms from a non-musculoskeletal origin such as those of swelling [23] due to blood pooling in the lower limbs [16] have been suggested. However, a systematic overview of such mechanisms has not, as yet, been provided.

Considering the current emphasis on replacing office workplace sitting with standing, and the number of existing occupations that have traditionally been exposed to prolonged standing, a profound understanding of the health consequences of standing is needed to inform healthy work practices. Evidence-based exposure limits of standing are needed, while an understanding of the mechanisms with regards to the association of prolonged standing and musculoskeletal symptoms is required. Our prior review of epidemiological studies examined the evidence of medium to long term dose-response relationships [14] but was not able to address acute dose-response relationships and contemporaneous potential mechanism changes. In this review we therefore aimed to: 1) systematically review the evidence on the acute associations between prolonged uninterrupted standing and non-specific musculoskeletal symptoms from controlled laboratory studies; 2) describe acute dose-response associations for standing and musculoskeletal symptoms to establish exposure limits; and, 3) tabulate potential mechanisms for these associations.

Section snippets

Search strategy

This review was a-priori registered [24] and executed according to the PRISMA statement guidelines [25]. To identify relevant publications, a comprehensive literature search was undertaken in electronic databases from database inception to 21 June 2016 using a combination of terms relevant to ‘standing’ and ‘work-related’ (Supplementary material 1–6). No specific terms for health outcomes were used as this study is part of a larger review aimed at assessing the associations of standing with

Study selection

The flow chart of the search and selection of literature is presented in Fig. 1. The search strategy yielded, after removing duplicates, 13,702 individual articles that were screened for inclusion. A total of 509 full text articles were considered, of which 296 met the criteria of describing outcomes of standing, 140 of them reporting on musculoskeletal symptoms. A total of 17 of these articles specifically addressed the association of prolonged standing and non-specific musculoskeletal

Prolonged standing and musculoskeletal symptoms

We have described the evidence on acute associations of prolonged standing and musculoskeletal symptoms from controlled laboratory studies. Prolonged standing was consistently associated with the development of low back and lower extremity symptoms in all identified studies reporting on these symptoms. There was inconsistent and limited evidence concerning risk for symptoms in other (e.g. upper extremity) areas. Our findings are broadly in line with what has been reported in earlier reviews [10]

Conclusion

This systematic review on laboratory studies found convincing evidence for a detrimental association between acute prolonged standing and development of musculoskeletal symptoms in the low back and lower extremities. We have reported on underlying mechanisms for these associations. Moreover, a safe exposure limit of 40 min of uninterrupted standing has been suggested before people typically develop clinically relevant levels of low back symptoms. This general exposure limit needs to considered

Author contribution

PC, LW, SP and JS conducted literature screening and data extraction of all included papers. LR and DB conducted the literature search in electronic data bases. All authors (PC, LW, SP, JS, LR, DB, GH, DD and LS) analysed the data and reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. LS is the study guarantor.

Acknowledgements

Funding sources: GNH was supported by a NHMRC Career Development Fellowship (NHMRC #108029). DD was supported by a NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship (NHMRC #1078360). LS was supported by a NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship (NHMRC #1019980). We are grateful for the financial assistance from the Victorian Government’s OIS Program.

References (54)

  • Safe Work Australia, National hazard exposure worker surveillance: exposure to biomechanical demands, pain and fatigue...
  • F. Tissot et al.

    Standing: sitting and associated working conditions in the Quebec population in 1998

    Ergonomics

    (2005)
  • M.S. Tremblay et al.

    Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle

    Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab.

    (2010)
  • A.A. Thorp et al.

    Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults a systematic review of longitudinal studies: 1996–2011

    Am. J. Prev. Med.

    (2011)
  • L. Straker et al.

    Sedentary Work − Evidence on an Emergent Work Health and Safety Issue

    (2016)
  • J.P. Buckley et al.

    The sedentary office: a growing case for change towards better health and productivity: expert statement commissioned by Public Health England and the Active Working Community Interest Company

    Br. J. Sports Med.

    (2015)
  • N. Shrestha et al.

    Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work

    Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.

    (2015)
  • M. Neuhaus et al.

    Reducing occupational sedentary time: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence on activity-permissive workstations

    Obes. Rev.

    (2014)
  • J.P. Callaghan et al.

    Is standing the solution to sedentary office work?

    Ergon. Design

    (2015)
  • T.R. Waters et al.

    Evidence of health risks associated with prolonged standing at work and intervention effectiveness

    Rehabil. Nurs.

    (2014)
  • J.L. Beebe-Dimmer et al.

    The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins

    Ann. Epidemiol.

    (2005)
  • A. Jawien

    The influence of environmental factors in chronic venous insufficiency

    Angiology

    (2003)
  • M. Bonzini et al.

    Risk of prematurity, low birthweight and pre-eclampsia in relation to working hours and physical activities: a systematic review

    Occup. Environ. Med.

    (2007)
  • P. Coenen et al.

    Associations of occupational standing with musculoskeletal symptoms: a systematic review with meta-analysis

    Br. J. Sports Med.

    (2016)
  • I. Halim et al.

    Development of prolonged standing strain index to quantify risk levels of standing jobs

    Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon.

    (2012)
  • D.M. Antle et al.

    Relationships between lower limb and trunk discomfort and vascular: muscular and kinetic outcomes during stationary standing work

    Gait Posture

    (2013)
  • K.M. Gallagher et al.

    Do individuals who develop transient low back pain exhibit different postural changes than non-pain developers during prolonged standing?

    Gait Posture

    (2011)
  • D.E. Gregory et al.

    Prolonged standing as a precursor for the development of low back discomfort: an investigation of possible mechanisms

    Gait Posture

    (2008)
  • M.D. Bussey et al.

    Gluteus medius coactivation response in field hockey players with and without low back pain

    Phys. Ther. Sport

    (2016)
  • J.P. Callaghan et al.

    Do NIRS measures relate to subjective low back discomfort during sedentary tasks?

    Int. J. Ind. Ergon.

    (2010)
  • J. Aghazadeh et al.

    Anti-fatigue mats, low back pain, and electromyography: an interventional study

    Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health

    (2015)
  • V. Balasubramanian et al.

    Comparing dynamic and stationary standing postures in an assembly task

    Int. J. Ind. Ergon.

    (2009)
  • M.R. Chester et al.

    Leg swelling: comfort and fatigue when sitting, standing, and sit/standing

    Int. J. Ind. Ergon.

    (2002)
  • P. Coenen et al.

    The association of prolonged standing and musculoskeletal symptoms: a systematic review of laboratory-based studies

    Prospero

    (2016)
  • D. Moher et al.

    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

    BMJ

    (2009)
  • L.M. Kmet et al.
  • A.M. Kelly

    Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain?

    Acad. Emerg. Med.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (81)

    • Assessment of cardiovascular load among hotel room cleaners

      2023, Applied Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cleaners are a vulnerable population as they have a high prevalence of obesity (Jørgensen et al., 2011) and uncontrolled hypertension (Krause and Arias, 2015), and are exposed to increasing physical workloads (Krause et al., 2005), high relative aerobic workloads (Unge et al., 2007), job stress (Rugulies et al., 2008; Feaster and Krause, 2018), low wages (May 2021 National Occupational Employment, 2021), and low socio-economic position, all associated with elevated blood pressure (BP), CVD, and mortality (Jørgensen et al., 2011; Krause and Arias, 2015; Feaster and Krause, 2018; Coenen et al., 2018a; Hall et al., 2019; Cillekens et al., ; Li et al., 2013; Zock, 2005; Sjögren et al., 2003; Colhoun et al., 1998; Raum et al., 2007; Kivimäki et al., 2012). Hotel room cleaning tasks require prolonged standing, walking, bending, and overall high intensity occupational physical activity (OPA) that may not only contribute to high levels of musculoskeletal disorders and severe pain (Krause et al., 2005; Unge et al., 2007; Coenen et al., 2017, 2018b) but also to detrimental cardiovascular effects. Specifically, OPA including prolonged standing or high levels of energy expenditure (EE) are associated with accelerated progression of atherosclerosis and increased risks for CVD and all-cause mortality (Coenen et al., 2018a; Hall et al., 2019; Cillekens et al., ; Li et al., 2013; Raum et al., 2007; Holtermann et al., 2010; Holtermann et al., 2009; Krause et al., 2007; Smith et al., 2018; Krause et al., 2000).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text