Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 51, January 2017, Pages 64-69
Gait & Posture

Full length article
Biologically-variable rhythmic auditory cues are superior to isochronous cues in fostering natural gait variability in Parkinson’s disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.09.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Loss of long-range correlation in PD gait is a symptom of advanced disease.

  • Isochronous cueing is known to improve average gait parameters but removes the long-range correlation even in early stage patients.

  • Embedding physiological variability in the stimulus avoids this side effect of cueing.

Abstract

Introduction

Rhythmic auditory cueing improves certain gait symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Cues are typically stimuli or beats with a fixed inter-beat interval. We show that isochronous cueing has an unwanted side-effect in that it exacerbates one of the motor symptoms characteristic of advanced PD. Whereas the parameters of the stride cycle of healthy walkers and early patients possess a persistent correlation in time, or long-range correlation (LRC), isochronous cueing renders stride-to-stride variability random. Random stride cycle variability is also associated with reduced gait stability and lack of flexibility.

Method

To investigate how to prevent patients from acquiring a random stride cycle pattern, we tested rhythmic cueing which mimics the properties of variability found in healthy gait (biological variability). PD patients (n = 19) and age-matched healthy participants (n = 19) walked with three rhythmic cueing stimuli: isochronous, with random variability, and with biological variability (LRC). Synchronization was not instructed.

Results

The persistent correlation in gait was preserved only with stimuli with biological variability, equally for patients and controls (p's < 0.05). In contrast, cueing with isochronous or randomly varying inter-stimulus/beat intervals removed the LRC in the stride cycle. Notably, the individual's tendency to synchronize steps with beats determined the amount of negative effects of isochronous and random cues (p's < 0.05) but not the positive effect of biological variability.

Conclusion

Stimulus variability and patients’ propensity to synchronize play a critical role in fostering healthier gait dynamics during cueing. The beneficial effects of biological variability provide useful guidelines for improving existing cueing treatments.

Introduction

Rhythmic auditory cues (e.g., repeated tones or music) can improve gait in Parkinson's disease (PD) [1].⁠ Such non-invasive stimulation leads to an immediate increase of cadence, stride length, and/or speed [2], [3]⁠ which might extend to non-cued gait following training [4].⁠ Benefits from cueing may be related to patients’ rhythmic skills [5].⁠ These findings suggest that a portable device can serve as a technological aid in assisting patients in their daily lives and delivering a training program [6].⁠ This use of cueing implies that many of the patients may aim to walk in synchrony with the stimulus. Success of an isochronous stimulus (i.e., tones separated by a constant time interval) is defined in terms of removing all temporal variation. Is it beneficial, however, to repetitively execute a stereotypical movement without any variation?

Computational models suggest that motor variability linked to basal ganglia activity fosters more effective motor learning [7].⁠ Slow variation in a repetitive reaching task in monkeys or in baseball pitching is a part of the process of learning and practicing [8].⁠ At the other extreme, forced long-term stereotypy can lead to loss of behavioral repertoire and even undesirable cortical reorganizations leading to focal dystonia [9]. Thus, variability in training is recommended as a general principle of rehabilitation practice [10].⁠

The temporal properties of variability are particularly important when the motor behavior necessarily involves repetition, such as the case of gait. Typically, however, only an averaged characterization of the gait cycle in terms of mean stride length, speed, and cadence has been used while studying the effects of rhythmic auditory cueing. This fails to reveal the influence of the temporal structure of cueing on the temporal dynamics of gait (i.e., the change of the gait cycle) throughout the trial.

In healthy individuals, the temporal dynamics of gait, expressed in terms of the inter-stride-intervals (ISI), exhibits non-random variability characterized by a persistent trend called long-range correlation (LRC). The LRC property of healthy gait, herein referred to as ‘biological variability’ because of its ubiquitous character in physiological processes [11], [12],⁠ is characterized by persistent trends unfolding on multiple temporal scales (i.e., it possesses fractal properties). LRC means that the ISI characterizing a given gait cycle depends on all previous ISIs. A random ISI would not depend on the previous ISIs. LRC is deemed an optimal form of control of physiological processes because LRC is a functionally beneficial combination of stability (persistent control) and variability (flexibility) [11].⁠ It has been associated with tolerance to errors and resistance to perturbations [12], [13]. Biological variability distinguishes faller from non-faller patients with so-called higher-level gait disorder (HLGD) [14]. Thus, the disappearance of LRC with advanced PD [15]⁠ is a clinically relevant symptom.

In spite of its beneficial effect on averaged measures, isochronous cueing may exacerbate certain PD symptoms related to the dynamics of these measures. Stimuli with isochronous beats remove LRC in healthy individuals [16]⁠ and in PD patients [17]. This could be avoided by embedding biological variability in the stimulus. We tested this strategy in a group of PD patients. The auditory stimuli also varied in terms of their musical complexity (a sequence of tones or music). This was to test the independence of the effect of variability from the characteristics of the auditory stimulus such as pitch, rhythmic features, and motivational factors (music is expected to be more motivating than a metronome) [18].⁠

The interval between the sounds or musical beats was either fixed (standard cueing), non-biologically variable (random uncorrelated noise), or biologically variable (with embedded LRC). The latter was hypothesized to preserve LRC of gait in patients with PD while also maintaining the other beneficial effects expected from standard cueing.

Section snippets

Participants

Nineteen non-demented patients with PD were recruited in the Department of Neurology of a Regional University Hospital of Montpellier, and in the neurological unit of another local hospital (Beau Soleil Clinic). The clinical diagnosis of PD was based on the Queen Square Brain Bank criteria. At the time of testing, all patients scored above the recommended cutoff for dementia (21/30) on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for screening cognition in PD. Patients were assessed on revised

Results

The analysis of gait parameters at pre-tests showed that patients' stride length was significantly shorter relative to controls (p < 0.01) by 9%. The two groups were comparable in the other gait parameters including LRC (see Table 2).

The effects of cueing conditions are summarized in Table 2. The statistics were based on data averaged across left and right turning trials and across the three stimulus types (metronome, music, AMN) because statistical analyses did not reveal any effects or

Discussion

LRC typical of healthy gait has been linked to increased adaptive stability to perturbations [12], [13],⁠ to movement efficiency in terms of kinetic energy re-use [25], and lowered risk of falls [26]. The goal of the present study was to test whether biological variability embedded in the cueing stimulus can overcome the deleterious side-effects of standard isochronous cueing. Our findings confirm two important hypotheses. First, consistent with previous studies [4]⁠, patients' gait loses its

Conclusion

The correlation between synchronization and negative impact of isochronous cueing reveals the following dilemma: recommend synchronization but sacrifice natural variability or spare natural variability but diminish the positive effects of synchronizing with the cue. While there might not be an immediate negative consequence of acquiring a more random gait pattern it is safe to assume that the long-term consequences will be substantial. Embedded biological variability should be introduced in

Financial disclosure

The authors do not hold financial interests in the outcome of the current study.

References (32)

  • I. Lim et al.

    Does cueing training improve physical activity in patients with Parkinson’s disease?

    Neurorehabil. Neural Repair

    (2010)
  • K. Doya et al.

    A computational model of birdsong learning by auditory experience and auditory feedback

  • K.S. Chaisanguanthum et al.

    Motor variability arises from a slow random walk in neural state

    J. Neurosci.

    (2014)
  • M. Merzenich

    How The New Science Of Brain Plasticity Can Change Your Life

    (2013)
  • A.L. Goldberger et al.

    Fractal dynamics in physiology: alterations with disease and aging

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2002)
  • L.A. Lipsitz et al.

    Loss of “complexity” and aging

    JAMA

    (1992)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Fractal auditory stimulation has greater benefit for people with Parkinson's disease showing more random gait pattern

      2020, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      If fractal variations reflect locomotor system’s health and adaptive capacity, as suggested by theories of complex adaptive systems [19–21], gait rehabilitation should aim to increase the persistence of stride-to-stride variations. Stride-to-stride variations can be manipulated toward more randomness or more persistence when the inter-beat intervals present random or persistent variations, respectively [22–24]. People with PD are able to synchronize with fractal RAS, and to shift their stride-to-stride variations away from randomness toward more persistence.

    • Why do we move to the beat? A multi-scale approach, from physical principles to brain dynamics

      2020, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      The temporal structure of cueing appears to influence the temporal dynamics of gait. Dotov et al. (2017) demonstrated that cueing with isochronous or randomly varying inter-stimulus/beat intervals removed the LRC in the stride cycle. In contrast, persistent correlation in gait was unaffected with stimuli which mimicked the properties of variability found in healthy gait.

    • Cognitive effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation in Parkinson's disease: A P300 study

      2019, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the mechanisms underlying AMS effects on temporal encoding are still unclear, the BG, involved in both motor and rhythm perception, are thought to contribute to this embodied timing coding during “active AMS”. Interestingly, PD patients benefit more from such a “passive AMS” than “active AMS” during gait training (Dotov et al., 2017; Hove et al., 2012). The present study, therefore, investigated whether active versus passive AMS influences the aforementioned effect of temporal predictability in PD patients.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Circuito Mario de la Cueva 20, Insurgentes Cuicuilco, Ciudad de México, D.F México.

    View full text