Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 32, Issue 2, June 2010, Pages 263-268
Gait & Posture

Sagittal and frontal plane joint mechanics throughout the stance phase of walking in adolescents who are obese

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.05.008Get rights and content

Abstract

The incidence of obesity has increased dramatically in children and adolescents, and with this comes health risks typically associated with adult obesity. Among those health consequences are musculoskeletal damage and pain. Previous studies have demonstrated inconsistent effects of increased body mass on movement patterns in adults and children who are obese. The purpose of this study was to investigate frontal and sagittal plane mechanics during walking in adolescents who were obese. Adolescents (12–17 years) who were obese were recruited from a weight management program, and healthy weight peers (matched for age, race and gender) were recruited from the community. Three-dimensional motion analysis of the lower extremities was performed during walking. Analysis of kinematic and kinetic data from 36 adolescents who were obese and healthy weight revealed significant differences in mechanics at all lower extremity joints in both sagittal and frontal planes. Subjects who were obese seemed to use movement strategies that minimized joint moments, especially at the hip and knee during walking. The lower extremity mechanics during walking in the subjects who were obese raise concerns about maintenance of structural integrity of the lower extremity joints over time, given the repeated high stresses across the joints even with walking. Neither the long term consequences of these atypical movement patterns, nor the ability to alter these patterns through therapeutic activities or weight loss has been investigated in adolescents who are obese.

Introduction

Childhood obesity, defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as having a body mass index (BMI) greater than the 95th percentile for age and gender, has become an epidemic, with 17.4% of all adolescents (12–19 years) in the United States classified as obese [1]. Chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, commonly seen in adults who are obese, are now seen in adolescents who are obese [2], [3]. Musculoskeletal conditions, including osteoarthritis, low back pain, and soft tissue injury, are often associated with obesity [4], [5]. Increased body mass, with increased forces across weight-bearing joints, has been causally implicated in many of these musculoskeletal conditions [5].

Forces on joint surfaces are increased during any weight-bearing activity, including walking. Increased body mass may increase risk of damage and injury to joint surfaces and other musculoskeletal structures with repetitive loading during weight-bearing activities. Many have hypothesized that movement patterns are significantly different in individuals who are obese. While most studies report that children and adults who are obese walk slower, with a wider step width, shorter steps, and increased double support time/decreased single limb support time [6], [7], [8], [9]. Nantel et al. [10] reported no difference in gait velocity, cadence, stride length or double limb support time in obese versus healthy weight (HW) children.

Reports of kinematic and kinetic characteristics of walking in individuals who are obese are inconsistent. Peak knee flexion angles during stance phase of walking have been reported as being lower in children and adults who are obese [11], [12] while others reported no difference in these angles [8], [9]. Peak plantarflexion angles have been reported as lower [9] and higher [10] in obese versus HW subjects. The lower plantarflexion angles were noted in subjects with significantly slower gait velocity [9]. No differences in sagittal plane hip and knee moments have been found between obese and HW subjects during walking [8], [11], [12]. Compared to HW adults, sagittal plane ankle moments of obese adults have been reported as lower [8] and higher [12] during walking. Nantel et al. [10] reported the only difference in lower extremity sagittal plane kinetics during walking was an earlier shift from hip extension moment to hip flexion moment in obese versus HW children.

Less data is available for frontal plane biomechanics during walking. Compared to HW individuals, peak hip frontal plane angles during stance phase have been reported as significantly more abducted in adults who are obese [9], and as significantly more adducted in children who are obese [13]. The greater hip abduction angles were reported in subjects who walked significantly slower than their lean peers [9]. Greater knee valgus and rearfoot inversion during walking has been reported in children who are obese (compared to HW peers) [13], while studies have alternately reported higher knee adduction moments [13] and knee abduction moments [11] in obese versus HW children.

In summary, a variety of investigations of the effects of obesity on characteristics of walking have yielded inconsistent results. Studies to date have included adults and children (8–13 years old). Frontal and sagittal plane biomechanics in hip, knee and ankle at specific points during the stance phase of walking in adolescents who are obese have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to examine the sagittal and frontal plane lower extremity biomechanics during walking in adolescents who were obese versus HW peers.

Section snippets

Subjects

Both male and female adolescents who were obese and HW were recruited for this study. Inclusion criteria were: age (12–17 years), BMI (less than the 85th percentile for age and gender for HW group; and greater than 95th percentile for age and gender for obese group). Potential subjects were excluded if they had musculoskeletal, neuromuscular, and/or cardiopulmonary conditions other than obesity that would limit movement or compromise safety. Participants who were obese were recruited from a

Results

Sagittal plane. Subjects who were obese had a significantly lower plantarflexion moment during late stance compared to the HW group (Table 2 and Fig. 1D). The obese group had significantly less knee flexion at initial contact (Table 2 and Fig. 1B). In general the subjects who were obese maintained a relatively more extended knee throughout stance. Knee flexion moment was significantly lower in the obese group at initial contact and in late stance (Table 2 and Fig. 1E). At the hip, subjects who

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to investigate the sagittal and frontal plane lower extremity biomechanics during walking in adolescents who were obese versus adolescents who were HW. Significant differences between groups were found in sagittal and frontal plane kinematics and kinetics at all three lower extremity joints during walking.

Sagittal plane. The only significant difference between groups at the ankle in the sagittal plane was the peak plantarflexion moment in late stance, which was

Limitations

Both males and females were recruited for this study in order to improve the generalizability of the results. While combining male and female subjects does introduce a source of potential variability, there were too few males actually enrolled in the current study to compare them separately. Potential differences in movement characteristics between males and females who are obese will need further study.

Skin movement and marker placement errors are potential confounders of movement data,

Summary

Subjects who were obese exhibited significant differences in both sagittal and frontal kinematics and kinetics of the lower extremities during the stance phase of walking. This was especially true at the knee, a joint which is prone to damage and injury. We hypothesize that muscle weakness is one potential cause of these movement differences, and are currently investigating the correlations between muscle strength at the hip and knee and the observed gait deviations in this group of subjects.

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors on this manuscript had or have any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) this work.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded in part by a Research Development Award to Dr. Gross McMillan from East Carolina University. These funds were used for supplies, subject reimbursement, and research assistant salary.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text