Temporal and spatial gait parameters analysis in non-pathological Mexican children
Introduction
In order to analyze gait, it is necessary to study different temporal and spatial parameters; among some of the most important of these are: gait cycle (GC) time and duration of each GC phase; step length, stride length, and toe in/out (angle of step) [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].
During the first years of life, humans learn to walk instinctively by experimenting with their own bodies until they find an individual walking style. Despite the individual nature of this process, there are sufficient similarities to develop a characteristic human walking pattern. This pattern, however, presents several individual intrinsic and extrinsic modifying factors [7], [8], [9]. To evaluate the specific characteristics of a certain pathological gait pattern, it is necessary to compare it to parameters studied in “normal” individuals, clinically healthy, for each type of population, and according to age and gender [1], [10], [11]. The use of non-dimensional parameters allows comparison among populations; however, its use is not yet widely diffused. Previous studies evaluating normal gait patterns have been performed predominantly among Anglo-Saxon populations [3], [5]. We believe, however, that these cannot be employed to evaluate gait parameters, due to the obvious anthropometric differences between the Anglo-Saxon and Mexican populations. On the other hand, certain kinematic parameters have not been considered and might provide additional information for the analysis. Two studies that analyze gait parameters among 30 Mexican children (the majority was 4 years old) have already been published. Reported data, however, is not sufficient for a further evaluation of infant gait, which also requires information for different age ranges and temporal and spatial factors. To date, this data is not available [1], [4].
The main objective of the present study was to identify and analyze temporal and spatial gait patterns among healthy Mexican children to define normal values. From these normal patterns, we could subsequently identify pathological gait patterns among Mexican children, thus providing valuable data for further study of this gait type.
Section snippets
Methods
A descriptive study was conducted at the Human Motion Analysis Laboratory of the National Rehabilitation Institute facilities in Mexico City. Temporal and spatial gait parameters of healthy children were measured. Sample extraction was carried out from a population of students of a private school (Instituto Montini, A.C., Mexico City).
Results
A population of 133 individuals was studied. Thirteen of these subjects were eliminated from the sample due to an evident pathological gait pattern during clinical assessment. Analyzed sample comprised 61 boys and 59 girls between the ages of 6 and 13 years (Table 1); average age was 9.4 (1.8) years (youngest 6, and oldest 13 years of age); average height was 139.73 (11.18) cm and mean weight was 37.57 (10.87) kg. Body mass index (BMI) was 18.7 (3.5) kg/m2 (min. 12.6 kg/m2, and max. 29.3 kg/m2) and
Discussion
The present study intended to explore gait parameters among a representative sample of Mexican children in order to identify relevant information which can be used in later studies of interest to our institution.
According to the results obtained when grouping the sample by age intervals, there is evidence that age might be a relevant gait modifying factor thus, prior to perform any comparison, it would be recommendable to carefully select an appropriate group of age in order to obtain reliable
Conclusions
The gait in children is influenced by a set of neurological and muscle-skeletal adaptations that determine a pattern which evolves and optimizes as the individual matures. Results obtained from this study suggest that gait pattern of children may be affected by the age and by the use of footwear. Gender, however, appears not to be a significant modifying gait factor between 6 and 13 years of age.
Finally, there is evidence that children populations might exhibit differences between gait
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Grant and financial support
The source of support was exclusively internal (National Rehabilitation Institute).
We certify that no party having a direct interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on us or on any organization with which we are associated.
Acknowledgements
This study was possible thanks to the support of Ma. del Pilar Cantú-Latapi, M.A., Director of the Instituto Montini, A.C., Elementary School; also to Penélope Garduño-Gutiérrez, Ph.D. and Mónica Rodríguez-Varagnolo, Ph.D., both with doctoral degrees in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, the personnel at the Human Motion Laboratory of the National Rehabilitation Institute in Mexico City and to Lucienne López Moreno. We would like to thank all the children and their parents and teachers who
References (21)
- et al.
A normative sample of temporal and spatial gait parameters in children usign the GAITRite® electronic walkway
Gait Posture
(2007) - et al.
Análisis de parámetros cinemáticos de la marcha normal. Estudio y análisis de patrones de marcha normal
Rev Mex Med Fis Rehabil
(1996) - et al.
La marcha humana
(1996) - et al.
Marcha normal y patológica
(1972) - et al.
Estudio de patrones cinemáticos de marcha normal pediátrica. Estandarización de marcha normal en población pediátrica mexicana
Acta Ortop Mex
(1998) Biomecánica de la marcha humana normal y patológica
(1993)Biomecánica del movimiento humano de Williams y Lissner
(1991)- et al.
Development of gait in childhood. Part I: Method
Devel Med Child Neurol
(1971) - et al.
Development of gait in the normal child
J Pediat Orthop
(1981) Footprint sequences of normal children under five years old
Devel Med Child Neurol
(1969)
Cited by (41)
Normative database of spatiotemporal gait parameters using inertial sensors in typically developing children and young adults
2020, Gait and PostureCitation Excerpt :The Mobility Lab® system has been shown to be valid and repeatable in healthy young adults [4], and was partially validated in typically developing children (ages 3.0–8.3) against 3D motion analysis [6], but test-retest repeatability in children is still lacking. Previous studies have presented normative data for spatiotemporal gait parameters in children utilizing 3D motion capture [19] and GAITRite® [20–23]. A partial normative database utilizing the APDM Mobility Lab® system has been established in adults [1], but has yet to be established in children.
Attentional load of walking in children aged 7–12 and in adults
2017, Gait and PostureReference data for performances on the standardized walking obstacle course in children developing typically
2016, Gait and PostureCitation Excerpt :Examining the data, more time and number of steps were needed while carrying a tray versus not carrying the tray, but stumbles and steps of the path not changing indicate stability throughout tasks [8]. On average, as children increased in height and age the number of steps and cadence decreased comparable with existing pediatric data [9]. The coefficients of variation for the conditions of W and WG are fairly constant across the ages and differ slightly from WT condition.