Task-specific measures of balance efficacy, anxiety, and stability and their relationship to clinical balance performance
Introduction
Despite the prevalence of fear of falling, coupled with low balance confidence in older adults [1] and patient populations [2], [3], [4], there has been little focus on the impact of such psychological factors on postural control. The majority of research examining the effects of fear and anxiety on balance behavior has been restricted to posturographic measures [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], which are not commonly used in clinical settings, in addition to being poorly correlated with patient performance during clinical balance assessments [11], [12]. Therefore, it is of value to examine how psychological measures affect performance on tests used in clinical balance assessments; in particular, functional reach and one-leg stance tests, which have shown strong intrarater and interrater reliability [13], [14], [15] and potential for predicting falls in elderly patients [16], [17].
Fear of falling has commonly been assessed using scales such as the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC) [18]. However, there is evidence that psychological measures relating to gait and balance are task-specific [19], and that self-efficacy and anxiety are separate constructs [20], suggesting that independent evaluation tools for confidence, anxiety, and stability are necessary. Task-specific tools that probe self-efficacy and perceived anxiety have been developed, which are sensitive to changes in postural threat and related to concomitant changes in postural control [6]. However, the reliability of these task-specific measures remains unknown.
In this study, a height-induced postural threat was used to gain insight into the relationship between balance and psychological factors. The use of healthy young adults as participants was the result of minimizing potential confounds related to the aging process. The study's objectives were three-fold: (1) to determine the effects of postural threat on balance control during quiet stance, functional reach, and one-leg stance tasks; (2) to explore the predictive validity of task-specific questionnaires; and (3) to determine the reliability of these questionnaires over three repeated sessions.
Section snippets
Subjects
The subjects were: 31 healthy young adults, composed of 18 females (mean ± S.D.: age = 19.94 ± 1.51 years, height = 1.66 ± 0.07 m, mass = 62.06 ± 8.65 kg) and 13 males (mean ± S.D.: age 20.23 ± 1.64 years, height = 1.78 ± 0.08 m, mass = 76.12 ± 12.39 kg) all of whom were volunteer participants. All participants were required to provide written, informed consent in relation to experimental procedures approved by the University of Waterloo's Office of Human Research (OHR# 8509).
Procedure
Participants stood on a portable force platform
Postural changes
MANOVAs for postural measures during the quiet stance revealed a significant main effect of postural threat (Wilks’ = 0.56, F(6,25) = 3.28, p = 0.02). Univariate ANOVAs revealed significant effects for COP measures of AP-RMS, AP-MPF, and AP-MP: F(1,30) = 13.66, p = 0.001; F(1,30) = 6.03, p = 0.02; and F(1,30) = 5.86, p = 0.02, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1A, the AP-MPF was significantly increased (18.26%) in the high compared to the low threat, while the AP-RMS and AP-MP were both significantly reduced
Discussion
Increased frequency and decreased amplitude of COP displacement were observed during quiet standing in conditions of “high” compared to “low” postural threat, which replicates previous findings [5], [6], [8], [9], [10]. We have provided new empirical evidence that postural threat also affects measures of clinical balance performance such as one-leg stance and functional reach.
Diminished performance on one-leg stance and functional reach tests has been observed in healthy older adults and
Conclusions
Postural threat can modify not only physical measures of postural control but also psychological measures of perceived efficacy, anxiety, and stability during both quiet standing and more dynamic balance tasks. It is thus recommended that evaluation of psychological factors be incorporated into assessment and rehabilitation programs.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no known conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgements
Supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
The authors would like to acknowledge the editorial input of Julie Falkner and Ryan J. Vetter of The Vetter Group.
References (30)
- et al.
Influence of height on the spatial orientation and equilibrium of the body
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
(2000) - et al.
Postural control is scaled to level of postural threat
Gait Posture
(2000) - et al.
The effect of anxiety on the regulation of upright standing among younger and older adults
Gait Posture
(2006) - et al.
Balance disorders in older persons: quantification with posturography
Otolarygol Head Neck Surg
(1998) - et al.
A pilot study to explore the predictive validity of 4 measures of falls risk in frail elderly patients
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2005) - et al.
Home postural evaluation: comparison between fallers and non fallers
Ann Readapt Med Phys
(2005) - et al.
One-leg stance in healthy young and elderly adults: a measure of postural steadiness?
Clin Biomech
(2004) - et al.
Postural control in the elderly: an analysis of test–retest and interrater reliability of the COP-COM variable
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2001) - et al.
Sampling duration effects on centre of pressure summary measures
Gait Posture
(2001) - et al.
Frequencies and circumstances of falls in the National Institute for Longevity Sciences, Longitudinal Study of Aging
J Epidemiol
(2000)
Prospective assessment of falls in Parkinson's disease
J Neurol
Fear of falling among stroke survivors after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation
Int J Rehabil Res
Psychological aspects of balance and gait disorders
Age-related differences in the effect of a perceived threat to stability on postural control
J Gerontol
Postural, physiological and psychological reactions to challenging balance: does age make a difference?
Age Ageing
Cited by (79)
Exploring emotional-modulation of visually evoked postural responses through virtual reality
2022, Neuroscience LettersInvestigation of the relationship between Ironworker's gait stability and different types of load carrying using wearable sensors
2022, Advanced Engineering InformaticsEffects of social anxiety on static and dynamic balance task assessment in older women
2021, Gait and PostureThe effects of perturbation type and direction on threat-related changes in anticipatory postural control
2020, Human Movement ScienceCitation Excerpt :At the end of each experimental condition, participants rated how anxious, fearful of falling and stable they felt when performing the rise-to-toes. Each item was rated on an 11-point Likert scale from 0 (not anxious, fearful, or stable) to 100 (extremely anxious or fearful, completely stable) (Hauck et al., 2008). Ground reaction forces and moments from the force plate were sampled at 1000 Hz (micro1401 and Spike2, Cambridge Electronics Design, UK) and were used to calculate COP in the A-P direction (relative to the participant's standing position).