Individualizing characteristics of footprints in Gujjars of North India—Forensic aspects
Introduction
Human foot has been studied for a variety of reasons, i.e. for forensic as well as for non-forensic purposes by anatomists, forensic scientists, anthropologists, physicians, podiatrists, foot industries, US army and numerous other groups. Comparison of the shape, size or morphology of a footprint has been used successfully in criminal investigation and in the administration of justice in the past. Various forensic studies have been conducted in this regard which universally concluded that the mature foot and its impression are not only unique to an individual, but also can provide highly valuable clues regarding personal identity in a crime scene investigation [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11].
Footprints can be found as a kind of evidence and can be collected from almost all types of crime scenes. The stride length, position of each footprint, its shape, size, angulations and depth, interspaces of toes, ball lines, insteps, inner and outer margins, heel creases, injuries or accidental damages provide indirect information with regard to gait pattern, height of the person, length of legs, range of body weight and interrelated movement of the foot, ankle, leg and the body that are individualistic to that particular person [12]. Thus, the footprints whether complete or partial or even a small portion can provide evidence, which may indicate the skeletal and body structure of the person who made it.
In a foot, the particular alignment of the bones to one another and even the way they are held by connective tissues are the product of heredity and environment and differ not only from individual to individual but also from left to right feet of the same individual; even identical twins do not make identical footprints.
The purpose of the present investigation is to study the shape, size, alignment of toes, humps, creases, cuts, cracks, pits, etc., of the foot so as to draw conclusions for individualizing characteristics. In addition, the occurrence or frequency of some of the foot characteristics was also recorded in the population under study.
Section snippets
Material and methods
The present cross-sectional study was conducted on 1040 adult male Gujjars ranging in age from 18 to 30 years inhabiting the Siwalik hills and adjoining plains in the sub-Himalayan region located in the north-east of Chandigarh city in India. The data constitute a sample from 16 villages of rural background. These 16 villages are identified on the basis of demographic composition. Majority of the population living in these villages belong to Gujjars along with a few households of other caste
Morphological or individualizing characteristics of the footprints
As the footprint is an impressed representation of the morphological or shape features of the fleshed foot, the weight-bearing pressure of the body imprints the shape of the foot on whatever surface it touches whether the surface is a floor or the inside of a shoe. A footprint is the negative image of the positive fleshed plantar surface representing only the weight-bearing areas of the plantar surface [12]. A footprint may be normal, flat, curved or one of the infinite variations in between
Discussion and conclusion
The present study highlights some of the new individualizing characteristics of the footprints like the detailed investigation of phalange marks, pits, cracks, abnormal horizontal ridge and flatfoot character. The study further confirms that the morphological features such as relative length of toes, humps in the ball line, phalange marks, creases, pits, deformity, flatfoot condition, etc., can serve as useful evidence and link between the crime and the perpetrator. Some of these
Acknowledgements
I gratefully acknowledge the voluntary participation and cooperation of my subjects during data collection. I would like to thank Dr. Abhik Ghosh, Senior Lecturer, Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India, for his valuable suggestions during preparation of the manuscript.
References (16)
- et al.
Naked footmarks—a preliminary study of identification factors
Forensic Sci. Int.
(1980) Uniqueness of bare feet and its use as a possible means of identification
Forensic Sci. Int.
(1996)Bare-footprint marks
The individuality of human footprints
J. Forensic Sci.
(1978)Use of footprints, especially forefoot prints, from the forensic viewpoint
Z. Rechtsmed.
(1987)- et al.
Barefoot impressions-a preliminary study of identification characteristics and population frequency of their morphological features
J. Forensic Sci.
(1988) Footwear Impression Evidence
(2000)- et al.
Footprint-based personal recognition
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
(2000)
Cited by (90)
Forensic measurement comparison of foot insole impressions
2024, Science and JusticeGhosting phenomenon in static and dynamic footprints in India and the United States
2023, Science and JusticeFootwear-to-feet examination and analysis: Comparing worn footwear to persons and human remains
2023, Science and JusticeBody mass estimation from footprint size in hominins
2021, Journal of Human EvolutionCitation Excerpt :Only two studies that developed regression equations for predicting body mass from foot or footprint size examined habitually unshod people (Krishan, 2008; Dingwall et al., 2013). In one case (Krishan, 2008), this was not explicitly stated, but an earlier report on the same study sample noted that “all the subjects were villagers and most of them are in the habit of walking bare feet [sic]” (Krishan, 2007: 138). Here we examine the relationship between body mass and foot size in 243 habitually unshod individuals representing five geographically dispersed populations of varying body size and shape.
The contact area of static and dynamic footprints: Forensic implications
2021, Science and JusticeChasing ghosts: An investigation of the ghosting phenomenon in footprints
2020, Science and Justice