Sever’s disease—Does it effect quality of life?
Introduction
Sever’s disease, also known as calcaneal apophysitis, is an inflammation of the apophysis of the heel, which is open in childhood [1], [2]. It is a condition which has been commented upon and looked at in a retrospective fashion, but has not to date been examined in a systematic manner.
The generally accepted anecdotal clinical picture of Sever’s disease is that of an active sport-playing child aged between 10 and 12 years, more often male, often presenting at the beginning of a sport season, often in the midst of a growth spurt, and experiencing pain over the apophyseal area of one or both heels [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. The child will generally be found to have limited ankle joint dorsiflexion, an underlying biomechanical deformity of variable nature and increased activity will worsen the pain [3], [4], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. The pain is often severe enough so that at the end of a sporting activity the child will actively limp to take weight off the affected heel[s] [3], [4], [6], [7], [8].
The actual effect of Sever’s disease on the patient’s quality of life [QoL] has not been investigated in the literature at all, consequently it is not really known if this condition actually impacts on the quality of life of those individuals with this condition and if this condition is truly worth committing resources for treatment.
The aim of this study, as part of a larger project, was to determine if Sever’s disease actually produced any change in the QoL of patients compared to a non-symptomatic cohort.
Sever’s disease, being a self-limiting condition [4], affects quality of life rather than affecting life expectancy [14]. Establishing the effect of this condition on the individual is important in the determination of allocation of health services for treatment. While simple measures such as visual analogue scales can measure individual components of pain, such data does not offer a holistic or global picture of the quality of life effects of a condition [15], [16]. Comparison to an asymptomatic population provides a more appropriate picture of the impact this condition has on children with Sever’s disease. An accepted tool to capture such effects includes questionnaires that can compare the quality of life between the asymptomatic and symptomatic populations. Selection of an appropriate questionnaire was also influenced by the need to capture the musculoskeletal effect of this disorder on QoL factors.
Selection of an appropriate questionnaire began with a literature review of databases using key terms to identify possible QoL measurement tools. From this exercise, 31 questionnaires/health measures were identified and examined for suitability. Of these 31 questionnaires, 27 were subsequently discarded for the reasons outlined in Table 1.
Adult designed questionnaires were discarded as it has been reported that tools designed for adults were inappropriate for administration to children due to their inability to measure known differences in health status and ceiling effects being exhibited in the scales [14]. In addition to this, most of these questionnaires were validated and assessed for sensitivity exclusively on adult populations. Therefore, they could not be assumed to accurately carry over to a paediatric population. Similarly, those designed for specific conditions such as asthma or juvenile rheumatoid arthritis were discarded due to their testing on these specific populations. A Dutch pain measure had not been translated into English and was thus ruled out, and those designed for pain assessment only were thought to give too focused a view on this component of the QoL continuum. The final study listed in Table 1 was still being tested for validity and was therefore considered inappropriate until such testing was complete.
The four questionnaires considered were:
- •
POSNA paediatric musculoskeletal functional health questionnaire [POSNA] [17].
- •
Activities scale for kids [ASK] [18].
- •
Child health questionnaire [CHQ] [19].
- •
Paediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0 [PedsQL] [20].
The specific attributes of each instrument are presented in the following table (Table 2). The final choice of questionnaire was based upon consideration of these attributes, so that the final questionnaire contained all the elements necessary to accurately measure the baseline level of QoL and allow comparison between the Sever’s and non-Sever’s disease populations.
A comparison of the POSNA, ASK and CHQ [21] displayed less floor and ceiling effects for the ASK and POSNA questionnaires compared to the CHQ and identified that slightly different parameters were measured in their scales. The POSNA questionnaire was chosen as a QoL measure for this research as it was specific for musculoskeletal disorders, and as such would be more sensitive to change than a more generic scale such as the CHQ or PedsQL. As the POSNA questionnaire was designed to be filled out at the assessment point, it was deemed more likely to have a better response rate and less missing items in comparison to the ASK. It was also deemed more appropriate to have a functional health measure rather than a disability measure per se, as many respondents may not consider their condition to be ‘disabled’.
The POSNA questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool [17] designed specifically for assessing quality of life effects of musculoskeletal disorders in child and adolescent populations. Comprising 108 Likert-style items, it produces eight scales relating to various parameters as well as assessing co-morbidities apart from the musculoskeletal disorder in question. Designed for use from the ages of two to eighteen, the questionnaire exists in two versions becoming a self-answering document from the age of eleven; until that age it is designed to be filled in by parents or guardians. Advice sought from the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, the owners of the questionnaire, suggested that use of the older child questionnaire would be appropriate for children under 11, as it was to be administered in an interview format in this study. This was done to satisfy a requirement of Department of Education and Children Services (DECS) and because there were several colloquial American terms within the wording which may have been hard for the subjects to understand. Four of the scales were selected for this study, consisting of:
- •
Satisfaction with symptoms scale.
- •
Pain/comfort scale.
- •
Happiness scale.
- •
Sport and physical functioning scale.
Satisfaction with symptoms—is a single item comprising a five-point scale asking how the subject feels about spending the rest of their life with their current musculoskeletal condition at the time of the questionnaire.
Pain/comfort scale—is a three-item scale with questions relating to how much pain the subject had in the last week and how much this pain interfered with their activities, both in sporting and daily activities.
Happiness scale—is a five-item scale with questions relating to how happy the subject is with their body, looks, clothes they can wear, general health and ability to do what their friends can do.
Sport and physical functioning scale—is a twelve-item scale with questions relating to whether the subject has been able to take part in normal activities such as climbing stairs, walking various distances and running short distances. Other questions assess participation in various levels of sport such as Physical Education, playing with friends at recess, competitive sports and general playing with friends. The remaining questions relate to whether assistance is necessary for walking or climbing activities.
Section snippets
Design
This study used a prospective two group comparison design to establish if there were differences in the quality of life of children with and without Sever’s disease. Two cohorts of children were recruited, one with Sever’s disease and the other without.
Ethics approval
Ethics approval was received from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of South Australia prior to recruitment of subjects. Ethical approval was also granted by the DECS for access to children in the government school sector and
Sample
Non-Sever’s subjects totaled 236. Sixty-seven Sever’s subjects were recruited.
Age
Fig. 1 examines the percentage distribution of ages in the two groups. It shows that the Sever’s group is more evenly spread across the age groups compared to the non-Sever’s group, which is more bell shaped in its distribution. This is in contrast to comparison of the means of the two groups (Table 3), which shows little difference. However, on chi-square analysis (p < 0.01) there was a significant difference between
Discussion
The four scales analysed from the POSNA musculoskeletal questionnaire revealed that subjects with Sever’s disease were in more pain and discomfort, less satisfied with their symptoms and less happy as a group than the non-Sever’s group. No other studies have assessed quality of life in Sever’s subjects, nor compared a symptomatic and non-symptomatic cohort. A literature search also failed to produce any comparable studies for quality of life changes in self-limiting musculoskeletal disorders in
Conclusion
This study has shown that Sever’s disease has a real and tangible effect on the quality of life of the subjects who have this condition and is deserving of prompt attention by health care professionals.
Conflict of interest
None.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by funding from the Australian Podiatry Education and Research Fund [APERF] and material support from Brooks Footwear and Nike Footwear.
References (29)
- et al.
Overuse injuries to tendons and apophyses in children and adolescents
Clin Sport Med
(1992) - et al.
Sever’s disease and its relationship to equinus: a statistical analysis
Clin Pod Med Surg
(1990) - et al.
Measures of outcomes for children and youth
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2000) - et al.
Measurement properties of the activities scales for kids
J Clin Epidemiol
(2000) - et al.
The Varni/Thompson Pediatric Pain Questionnaire. I. Chronic musculoskeletal pain in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis
Pain
(1987) Concerning some rare but important surgical injuries brought on by violent exercise
Lancet
(July 1908)Time schedule for the appearance and fusion of a second accessory center of ossification of the calcaneus
Child Dev
(1952)- et al.
Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the foot and ankle
(1962) - et al.
Calcaneal apophysitis in adolescent athletes
Can J App Sport Sci
(1981) - et al.
Prevention and management of calcaneal apophysitis in children: an overuse syndrome
J Paed Ortho
(1987)
Calcaneal apophysitis [Sever’s disease] a common cause of heel pain in young athletes
Scand J Med Sci Sport
Sever’s disease and other causes of heel pain in adolescents
Am Fam Phys
Apophysitis of the Os Calcis
N Y Med J
Apophysitis of the Os Calcis
Surg, Gynaecol Obstet
Cited by (22)
Paediatric Podiatry
2020, Neale’s Disorders of the Foot and AnklePediatric Problems and Rehabilitation Geared to the Young Athlete
2020, Baxter’s The Foot And Ankle In SportInfluence of minimalist shoes on lower-limb overuse injuries risk in children
2017, Science and SportsThe fitting of Sever's disease in young athletes
2020, Revue du PodologueYouth Athletes with Sever's Disease Exhibit Altered Achilles Tendon Ultrasound Characteristics: A Retrospective Case–Control Study
2024, Journal of Ultrasound in MedicineComparison of Braces for Treatment of Sever’s Disease (Calcaneal Apophysitis) in Barefoot Athletes: A Randomized Clinical Trial
2023, Journal of Athletic Training