The influence of walking speed on plantar pressure measurements using the two-step gait initiation protocol
Introduction
Plantar pressure measurement is being increasingly used in both research and clinical practice to compare gait patterns of different clinical groups and to evaluate the effects of footwear, orthotic and surgical interventions [1]. Significant differences in pressure patterns have been reported in people with diabetic neuropathy [2], [3], [4], leprosy [5] and rheumatoid arthritis [6] compared to healthy subjects, and numerous studies have employed plantar pressure technology to demonstrate significant changes in foot function when wearing orthoses [7], [8], [9], [10]. However, as with any technique for assessing gait patterns, it is important to determine whether the changes observed truly reflect the disease process or intervention being studied, rather than simply reflecting between-subject or between-trial variations in walking speed. This can be achieved either by standardising walking speed between trials (by the use of treadmills or metronomes), or by requesting subjects to walk at their normal speed and correcting for differences between subjects prior to undertaking inferential analyses. The former approach is limited due to changes in gait patterns induced by treadmills [11], [12], [13] and the difficulty some people have in walking to the beat of a metronome. The latter approach allows subjects to be assessed when walking normally, but requires an understanding of the relationship between walking speed and the parameters being studied. Indeed, concern has been expressed as to the impact of walking velocity on kinetic and kinematic parameters of gait. Lelas et al. [14] investigated the effect of self-determined walking speeds using staggered force platforms and concluded that there was a predictable change in force with altered walking velocities.
Despite the widespread use of plantar pressure technology, only three studies have directly addressed the influence of walking speed on pressure parameters. Using the EMED-F pressure plate system, Hughes et al. [15] reported linear increases in force and pressure values under the whole foot when participants walked at slow, medium and fast cadences. However, not all regions of the foot were equally influenced by speed, with the heel exhibiting increases in maximum force and peak pressure, while the lateral midfoot, lateral forefoot and lateral toes either showing no change or decreases in loading. Rosenbaum et al. [16] reported similar findings in 30 healthy participants using the EMED-SF2 system, and interpreted the changes in loading patterns as representing an overall medial shift in pressure. Finally, Zhu et al. [17] measured in-shoe plantar pressures in healthy subjects walking at six different cadences, ranging from 70 to 120 steps/min. With increasing cadence, mean pressure–time integrals continuously decreased, mean foot-to-floor contact durations continuously decreased, and mean peak pressures increased.
Although these results suggest that variation in walking speed does significantly influence plantar pressure measurement, none of these studies recorded pressure data using the two-step gait initiation protocol. This protocol, which involves subjects striking the force platform after completing two steps, is commonly used in gait research as it offers equivalent reliability to the midgait protocol but requires less walking trials [18], [19]. However, because subjects only take two steps prior to striking the platform, it is likely that they do not achieve the same walking velocity as they would if the recordings are taken midgait. Indeed, it has been shown that steady-state gait is not achieved until the end of the second or third step [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. As such, it is possible that variations in walking speed may not be as significant a factor when recording plantar pressures using the two-step protocol. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of walking speed on plantar pressure measurements obtained using the two-step gait initiation protocol. It was hypothesised that due to the small number of steps taken prior to striking the force plate using this method, differences in walking speed would have only a small impact on pressure recordings.
Section snippets
Participants
A convenience sample of 20 healthy participants (10 males, 10 females) aged 20–37 (mean 27.5, S.D. 5.2 years) were recruited from the staff and student population of the University of Western Sydney. All were free of any musculoskeletal or neurological conditions which may have influenced gait patterns. The University of Western Sydney Human Ethics Committee granted ethical approval for the study, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Protocol
Plantar pressure assessment was performed
Walking speed
When instructed to walk at three self-selected walking speeds (slow, normal and fast), participants increased their velocity in a linear manner (F2=175.7, P<0.001; r2=0.99). There was a 28% mean increase between the slow and normal speeds, and a 31% mean increase between the normal and fast speeds.
Contact time
Contact times for the three walking speeds are shown in Table 1. Total contact time decreased by 15% when walking at normal compared to slow speed, 16% when walking at fast compared to normal speed,
Discussion
The first issue to consider when interpreting the current results is the extent to which our sample can be generalised to the normal population. The range of walking speeds reported here (1.1–1.8 m/s) is very similar to the range of slow, comfortable and fast walking speeds reported by Oberg [27] for 60 people aged 20–40 years, and the normal walking speeds are similar to those of 73 people aged in their 20s and 30s reported by Bohannon [28]. Self-determined walking speeds were similar to that
Conclusion
This study has demonstrated the effects of increasing walking speed on plantar pressure parameters using the two-step gait initiation protocol. The findings indicate that controlling or correcting for small variations in walking speed may not be critical for contact time percentages, maximum force and peak pressure measurements, but is necessary for appropriate interpretation of force–time and pressure–time integrals.
References (32)
- et al.
A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking
Clin. Biomech.
(1998) - et al.
Comparison of angular lumbar spine and pelvis kinematics during treadmill and overground locomotion
Clin. Biomech.
(2002) - et al.
Predicting peak kinematic and kinetic parameters from gait speed
Gait Posture
(2003) - et al.
Reliability of pressure measurements: the EMED-F system
Clin. Biomech.
(1991) - et al.
Effects of walking speed on plantar pressure patterns and hindfoot angular motion
Gait Posture
(1994) - et al.
Walking cadence effect on plantar pressures
Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.
(1995) - et al.
Examination of the duration of gait initiation by use of an electrogoniometer
Gait Posture
(1993) Normal gait characteristics under temporal and distance constraints
J. Biomed. Eng.
(1989)- et al.
Initiation of gait in normal subjects—a preliminary study
J. Biomed. Eng.
(1990) - et al.
Determination of the step duration of gait initiation using a mechanical energy analysis
J. Biomech.
(1996)
Trajectory of the body COG and COP during initiation and termination of gait
Gait Posture
A comparison of gait initiation and termination methods for obtaining plantar foot pressures
Gait Posture
The accuracy of footprint contact area measurements: relevance to the design and performance of pressure platforms
Foot
Plantar pressure assessment
Phys. Ther.
The risk of foot ulceration in diabetic patients with high foot pressure—a prospective study
Diabetologia
Role of neuropathy and high foot pressures in diabetic foot ulceration
Diabetes Care
Cited by (82)
Forensic and Legal Medicine
2020, Neale’s Disorders of the Foot and AnkleVariation, mosaicism and degeneracy in the hominin foot
2022, Evolutionary Human Sciences